STRL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Fluor has a net margin of 22.7% compared to Sterling Infrastructure's net margin of 43.73%. Sterling Infrastructure's return on equity of 36.63% beat Fluor's return on equity of 84.64%.

Sterling Infrastructure has a consensus price target of $198.33, signalling upside risk potential of 30.7%. On the other hand Fluor has an analysts' consensus of $46.45 which suggests that it could grow by 30.62%. Given that Sterling Infrastructure has higher upside potential than Fluor, analysts believe Sterling Infrastructure is more attractive than Fluor.

Sterling Infrastructure has a beta of 1.188, which suggesting that the stock is 18.836% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fluor has a beta of 1.656, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.56%.

Sterling Infrastructure has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Fluor offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sterling Infrastructure pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fluor pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sterling Infrastructure quarterly revenues are $498.8M, which are smaller than Fluor quarterly revenues of $4.3B. Sterling Infrastructure's net income of $113.2M is lower than Fluor's net income of $1.9B. Notably, Sterling Infrastructure's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.33x while Fluor's PE ratio is 2.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sterling Infrastructure is 2.23x versus 0.38x for Fluor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a net margin of 22.7% compared to Sterling Infrastructure's net margin of 9.72%. Sterling Infrastructure's return on equity of 36.63% beat Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's return on equity of 13.72%.

Sterling Infrastructure has a consensus price target of $198.33, signalling upside risk potential of 30.7%. On the other hand Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has an analysts' consensus of $14.50 which suggests that it could grow by 58.3%. Given that Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has higher upside potential than Sterling Infrastructure, analysts believe Great Lakes Dredge & Dock is more attractive than Sterling Infrastructure.

Sterling Infrastructure has a beta of 1.188, which suggesting that the stock is 18.836% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a beta of 1.174, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.432%.

Sterling Infrastructure has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sterling Infrastructure pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sterling Infrastructure quarterly revenues are $498.8M, which are larger than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock quarterly revenues of $202.8M. Sterling Infrastructure's net income of $113.2M is higher than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's net income of $19.7M. Notably, Sterling Infrastructure's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.33x while Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's PE ratio is 10.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sterling Infrastructure is 2.23x versus 0.81x for Great Lakes Dredge & Dock. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Orion Group Holdings has a net margin of 22.7% compared to Sterling Infrastructure's net margin of 3.11%. Sterling Infrastructure's return on equity of 36.63% beat Orion Group Holdings's return on equity of -1.28%.

Sterling Infrastructure has a consensus price target of $198.33, signalling upside risk potential of 30.7%. On the other hand Orion Group Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $10.50 which suggests that it could grow by 68.81%. Given that Orion Group Holdings has higher upside potential than Sterling Infrastructure, analysts believe Orion Group Holdings is more attractive than Sterling Infrastructure.

Sterling Infrastructure has a beta of 1.188, which suggesting that the stock is 18.836% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Orion Group Holdings has a beta of 0.810, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.961%.

Sterling Infrastructure has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Orion Group Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sterling Infrastructure pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Orion Group Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sterling Infrastructure quarterly revenues are $498.8M, which are larger than Orion Group Holdings quarterly revenues of $216.9M. Sterling Infrastructure's net income of $113.2M is higher than Orion Group Holdings's net income of $6.8M. Notably, Sterling Infrastructure's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.33x while Orion Group Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sterling Infrastructure is 2.23x versus 0.27x for Orion Group Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Construction Partners has a net margin of 22.7% compared to Sterling Infrastructure's net margin of -0.54%. Sterling Infrastructure's return on equity of 36.63% beat Construction Partners's return on equity of 9.39%.

Sterling Infrastructure has a consensus price target of $198.33, signalling upside risk potential of 30.7%. On the other hand Construction Partners has an analysts' consensus of $103.97 which suggests that it could grow by 30.27%. Given that Sterling Infrastructure has higher upside potential than Construction Partners, analysts believe Sterling Infrastructure is more attractive than Construction Partners.

Sterling Infrastructure has a beta of 1.188, which suggesting that the stock is 18.836% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Construction Partners has a beta of 0.853, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.664%.

Sterling Infrastructure has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Construction Partners offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sterling Infrastructure pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Construction Partners pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sterling Infrastructure quarterly revenues are $498.8M, which are smaller than Construction Partners quarterly revenues of $561.6M. Sterling Infrastructure's net income of $113.2M is higher than Construction Partners's net income of -$3.1M. Notably, Sterling Infrastructure's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.33x while Construction Partners's PE ratio is 74.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sterling Infrastructure is 2.23x versus 2.12x for Construction Partners. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.