UUU Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Compx International has a net margin of -16.92% compared to Universal Security Instruments's net margin of 11.74%. Universal Security Instruments's return on equity of -26.44% beat Compx International's return on equity of 10.38%.

Universal Security Instruments has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Compx International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 23.63%. Given that Compx International has higher upside potential than Universal Security Instruments, analysts believe Compx International is more attractive than Universal Security Instruments.

Universal Security Instruments has a beta of 0.351, which suggesting that the stock is 64.945% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Compx International has a beta of 0.940, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.987%.

Universal Security Instruments has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Compx International offers a yield of 5.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Universal Security Instruments pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Compx International pays out 237.64% of its earnings as a dividend.

Universal Security Instruments quarterly revenues are $5.5M, which are smaller than Compx International quarterly revenues of $38.4M. Universal Security Instruments's net income of -$936.6K is lower than Compx International's net income of $4.5M. Notably, Universal Security Instruments's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Compx International's PE ratio is 15.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Universal Security Instruments is 0.19x versus 1.79x for Compx International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Iveda Solutions has a net margin of -16.92% compared to Universal Security Instruments's net margin of -23.14%. Universal Security Instruments's return on equity of -26.44% beat Iveda Solutions's return on equity of -60.54%.

Universal Security Instruments has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Iveda Solutions has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 241.88%. Given that Iveda Solutions has higher upside potential than Universal Security Instruments, analysts believe Iveda Solutions is more attractive than Universal Security Instruments.

Universal Security Instruments has a beta of 0.351, which suggesting that the stock is 64.945% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Iveda Solutions has a beta of 0.990, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.004%.

Universal Security Instruments has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Iveda Solutions offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Universal Security Instruments pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Iveda Solutions pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Universal Security Instruments quarterly revenues are $5.5M, which are larger than Iveda Solutions quarterly revenues of $2.4M. Universal Security Instruments's net income of -$936.6K is lower than Iveda Solutions's net income of -$555K. Notably, Universal Security Instruments's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Iveda Solutions's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Universal Security Instruments is 0.19x versus 0.90x for Iveda Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NAPCO Security Technologies has a net margin of -16.92% compared to Universal Security Instruments's net margin of 24.38%. Universal Security Instruments's return on equity of -26.44% beat NAPCO Security Technologies's return on equity of 28.2%.

Universal Security Instruments has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand NAPCO Security Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $30.40 which suggests that it could grow by 34.1%. Given that NAPCO Security Technologies has higher upside potential than Universal Security Instruments, analysts believe NAPCO Security Technologies is more attractive than Universal Security Instruments.

Universal Security Instruments has a beta of 0.351, which suggesting that the stock is 64.945% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NAPCO Security Technologies has a beta of 1.513, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.279%.

Universal Security Instruments has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NAPCO Security Technologies offers a yield of 2.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Universal Security Instruments pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NAPCO Security Technologies pays out 26.61% of its earnings as a dividend. NAPCO Security Technologies's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Universal Security Instruments quarterly revenues are $5.5M, which are smaller than NAPCO Security Technologies quarterly revenues of $42.9M. Universal Security Instruments's net income of -$936.6K is lower than NAPCO Security Technologies's net income of $10.5M. Notably, Universal Security Instruments's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NAPCO Security Technologies's PE ratio is 17.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Universal Security Instruments is 0.19x versus 4.50x for NAPCO Security Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

VerifyMe has a net margin of -16.92% compared to Universal Security Instruments's net margin of -6.54%. Universal Security Instruments's return on equity of -26.44% beat VerifyMe's return on equity of -33.15%.

Universal Security Instruments has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand VerifyMe has an analysts' consensus of $1.63 which suggests that it could grow by 143.26%. Given that VerifyMe has higher upside potential than Universal Security Instruments, analysts believe VerifyMe is more attractive than Universal Security Instruments.

Universal Security Instruments has a beta of 0.351, which suggesting that the stock is 64.945% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VerifyMe has a beta of 0.532, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.775%.

Universal Security Instruments has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. VerifyMe offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Universal Security Instruments pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VerifyMe pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Universal Security Instruments quarterly revenues are $5.5M, which are smaller than VerifyMe quarterly revenues of $7.7M. Universal Security Instruments's net income of -$936.6K is lower than VerifyMe's net income of -$501K. Notably, Universal Security Instruments's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while VerifyMe's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Universal Security Instruments is 0.19x versus 0.29x for VerifyMe. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.