VRME Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Iveda Solutions has a net margin of -44.6% compared to VerifyMe's net margin of -23.14%. VerifyMe's return on equity of -27.97% beat Iveda Solutions's return on equity of -60.54%.

VerifyMe has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 251.78%. On the other hand Iveda Solutions has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 117.39%. Given that VerifyMe has higher upside potential than Iveda Solutions, analysts believe VerifyMe is more attractive than Iveda Solutions.

VerifyMe has a beta of 0.628, which suggesting that the stock is 37.25% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Iveda Solutions has a beta of 1.112, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.23%.

VerifyMe has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Iveda Solutions offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. VerifyMe pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Iveda Solutions pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

VerifyMe quarterly revenues are $5.4M, which are larger than Iveda Solutions quarterly revenues of $2.4M. VerifyMe's net income of -$2.4M is lower than Iveda Solutions's net income of -$555K. Notably, VerifyMe's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Iveda Solutions's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VerifyMe is 0.26x versus 1.41x for Iveda Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Knightscope has a net margin of -44.6% compared to VerifyMe's net margin of -430.14%. VerifyMe's return on equity of -27.97% beat Knightscope's return on equity of -351.56%.

VerifyMe has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 251.78%. On the other hand Knightscope has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1309.77%. Given that Knightscope has higher upside potential than VerifyMe, analysts believe Knightscope is more attractive than VerifyMe.

VerifyMe has a beta of 0.628, which suggesting that the stock is 37.25% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Knightscope has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

VerifyMe has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Knightscope offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. VerifyMe pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Knightscope pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

VerifyMe quarterly revenues are $5.4M, which are larger than Knightscope quarterly revenues of $2.5M. VerifyMe's net income of -$2.4M is higher than Knightscope's net income of -$10.9M. Notably, VerifyMe's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Knightscope's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VerifyMe is 0.26x versus 2.72x for Knightscope. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NAPCO Security Technologies has a net margin of -44.6% compared to VerifyMe's net margin of 25.42%. VerifyMe's return on equity of -27.97% beat NAPCO Security Technologies's return on equity of 30.38%.

VerifyMe has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 251.78%. On the other hand NAPCO Security Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 24.55%. Given that VerifyMe has higher upside potential than NAPCO Security Technologies, analysts believe VerifyMe is more attractive than NAPCO Security Technologies.

VerifyMe has a beta of 0.628, which suggesting that the stock is 37.25% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NAPCO Security Technologies has a beta of 1.622, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.177%.

VerifyMe has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NAPCO Security Technologies offers a yield of 1.26% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. VerifyMe pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NAPCO Security Technologies pays out 26.61% of its earnings as a dividend. NAPCO Security Technologies's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

VerifyMe quarterly revenues are $5.4M, which are smaller than NAPCO Security Technologies quarterly revenues of $44M. VerifyMe's net income of -$2.4M is lower than NAPCO Security Technologies's net income of $11.2M. Notably, VerifyMe's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NAPCO Security Technologies's PE ratio is 26.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VerifyMe is 0.26x versus 6.94x for NAPCO Security Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Universal Security Instruments has a net margin of -44.6% compared to VerifyMe's net margin of 8.01%. VerifyMe's return on equity of -27.97% beat Universal Security Instruments's return on equity of -4.73%.

VerifyMe has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 251.78%. On the other hand Universal Security Instruments has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VerifyMe has higher upside potential than Universal Security Instruments, analysts believe VerifyMe is more attractive than Universal Security Instruments.

VerifyMe has a beta of 0.628, which suggesting that the stock is 37.25% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Universal Security Instruments has a beta of 0.735, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.466%.

VerifyMe has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Universal Security Instruments offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. VerifyMe pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Universal Security Instruments pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

VerifyMe quarterly revenues are $5.4M, which are smaller than Universal Security Instruments quarterly revenues of $7.2M. VerifyMe's net income of -$2.4M is lower than Universal Security Instruments's net income of $577K. Notably, VerifyMe's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Universal Security Instruments's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VerifyMe is 0.26x versus 0.24x for Universal Security Instruments. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.