PMNT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bassett Furniture Industries has a net margin of -- compared to Perfect Moment's net margin of 2.26%. Perfect Moment's return on equity of -- beat Bassett Furniture Industries's return on equity of -3.9%.

Perfect Moment has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 506.06%. On the other hand Bassett Furniture Industries has an analysts' consensus of $19.00 which suggests that it could grow by 27.43%. Given that Perfect Moment has higher upside potential than Bassett Furniture Industries, analysts believe Perfect Moment is more attractive than Bassett Furniture Industries.

Perfect Moment has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bassett Furniture Industries has a beta of 1.349, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.878%.

Perfect Moment has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bassett Furniture Industries offers a yield of 5.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Perfect Moment pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bassett Furniture Industries pays out -68.63% of its earnings as a dividend.

Perfect Moment quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Bassett Furniture Industries quarterly revenues of $82.2M. Perfect Moment's net income of -- is lower than Bassett Furniture Industries's net income of $1.9M. Notably, Perfect Moment's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Bassett Furniture Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Perfect Moment is -- versus 0.40x for Bassett Furniture Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

China Automotive Systems has a net margin of -- compared to Perfect Moment's net margin of 3.35%. Perfect Moment's return on equity of -- beat China Automotive Systems's return on equity of 8.37%.

Perfect Moment has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 506.06%. On the other hand China Automotive Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 112.47%. Given that Perfect Moment has higher upside potential than China Automotive Systems, analysts believe Perfect Moment is more attractive than China Automotive Systems.

Perfect Moment has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Automotive Systems has a beta of 2.331, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 133.143%.

Perfect Moment has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. China Automotive Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share. Perfect Moment pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Automotive Systems pays out 74.83% of its earnings as a dividend. China Automotive Systems's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Perfect Moment quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than China Automotive Systems quarterly revenues of $164.2M. Perfect Moment's net income of -- is lower than China Automotive Systems's net income of $5.5M. Notably, Perfect Moment's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while China Automotive Systems's PE ratio is 3.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Perfect Moment is -- versus 0.16x for China Automotive Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hyliion Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to Perfect Moment's net margin of --. Perfect Moment's return on equity of -- beat Hyliion Holdings's return on equity of --.

Perfect Moment has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 506.06%. On the other hand Hyliion Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 66.67%. Given that Perfect Moment has higher upside potential than Hyliion Holdings, analysts believe Perfect Moment is more attractive than Hyliion Holdings.

Perfect Moment has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyliion Holdings has a beta of 2.518, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 151.799%.

Perfect Moment has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hyliion Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Perfect Moment pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hyliion Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Perfect Moment quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Hyliion Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Perfect Moment's net income of -- is lower than Hyliion Holdings's net income of -$11.2M. Notably, Perfect Moment's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hyliion Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Perfect Moment is -- versus 108.47x for Hyliion Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Northann has a net margin of -- compared to Perfect Moment's net margin of --. Perfect Moment's return on equity of -- beat Northann's return on equity of --.

Perfect Moment has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 506.06%. On the other hand Northann has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Perfect Moment has higher upside potential than Northann, analysts believe Perfect Moment is more attractive than Northann.

Perfect Moment has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Northann has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Perfect Moment has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Northann offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Perfect Moment pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Northann pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Perfect Moment quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Northann quarterly revenues of --. Perfect Moment's net income of -- is lower than Northann's net income of --. Notably, Perfect Moment's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Northann's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Perfect Moment is -- versus 0.36x for Northann. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.