AMWD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Flexsteel Industries has a net margin of 6.12% compared to American Woodmark's net margin of 3.98%. American Woodmark's return on equity of 11.62% beat Flexsteel Industries's return on equity of 9.46%.

American Woodmark has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 41.33%. On the other hand Flexsteel Industries has an analysts' consensus of $48.00 which suggests that it could fall by -0.31%. Given that American Woodmark has higher upside potential than Flexsteel Industries, analysts believe American Woodmark is more attractive than Flexsteel Industries.

American Woodmark has a beta of 1.588, which suggesting that the stock is 58.778% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flexsteel Industries has a beta of 0.399, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.138%.

American Woodmark has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Flexsteel Industries offers a yield of 1.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. American Woodmark pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Flexsteel Industries pays out 30.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Flexsteel Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

American Woodmark quarterly revenues are $452.5M, which are larger than Flexsteel Industries quarterly revenues of $104M. American Woodmark's net income of $27.7M is higher than Flexsteel Industries's net income of $4.1M. Notably, American Woodmark's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.00x while Flexsteel Industries's PE ratio is 23.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for American Woodmark is 0.71x versus 0.76x for Flexsteel Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hooker Furnishings has a net margin of 6.12% compared to American Woodmark's net margin of -3.96%. American Woodmark's return on equity of 11.62% beat Hooker Furnishings's return on equity of -4.37%.

American Woodmark has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 41.33%. On the other hand Hooker Furnishings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 38.12%. Given that American Woodmark has higher upside potential than Hooker Furnishings, analysts believe American Woodmark is more attractive than Hooker Furnishings.

American Woodmark has a beta of 1.588, which suggesting that the stock is 58.778% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hooker Furnishings has a beta of 1.221, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.138%.

American Woodmark has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hooker Furnishings offers a yield of 6.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. American Woodmark pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hooker Furnishings pays out 98.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Hooker Furnishings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

American Woodmark quarterly revenues are $452.5M, which are larger than Hooker Furnishings quarterly revenues of $104.4M. American Woodmark's net income of $27.7M is higher than Hooker Furnishings's net income of -$4.1M. Notably, American Woodmark's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.00x while Hooker Furnishings's PE ratio is 111.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for American Woodmark is 0.71x versus 0.39x for Hooker Furnishings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MasterBrand has a net margin of 6.12% compared to American Woodmark's net margin of 4.05%. American Woodmark's return on equity of 11.62% beat MasterBrand's return on equity of 12.08%.

American Woodmark has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 41.33%. On the other hand MasterBrand has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 59.06%. Given that MasterBrand has higher upside potential than American Woodmark, analysts believe MasterBrand is more attractive than American Woodmark.

American Woodmark has a beta of 1.588, which suggesting that the stock is 58.778% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MasterBrand has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

American Woodmark has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MasterBrand offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. American Woodmark pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MasterBrand pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

American Woodmark quarterly revenues are $452.5M, which are smaller than MasterBrand quarterly revenues of $718.1M. American Woodmark's net income of $27.7M is lower than MasterBrand's net income of $29.1M. Notably, American Woodmark's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.00x while MasterBrand's PE ratio is 12.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for American Woodmark is 0.71x versus 0.70x for MasterBrand. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Regional Brands has a net margin of 6.12% compared to American Woodmark's net margin of --. American Woodmark's return on equity of 11.62% beat Regional Brands's return on equity of --.

American Woodmark has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 41.33%. On the other hand Regional Brands has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that American Woodmark has higher upside potential than Regional Brands, analysts believe American Woodmark is more attractive than Regional Brands.

American Woodmark has a beta of 1.588, which suggesting that the stock is 58.778% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Regional Brands has a beta of 0.203, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 79.749%.

American Woodmark has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Regional Brands offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $12.00 per share. American Woodmark pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Regional Brands pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

American Woodmark quarterly revenues are $452.5M, which are larger than Regional Brands quarterly revenues of --. American Woodmark's net income of $27.7M is higher than Regional Brands's net income of --. Notably, American Woodmark's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.00x while Regional Brands's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for American Woodmark is 0.71x versus 0.66x for Regional Brands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.