SPWH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Build-A-Bear Workshop has a net margin of -0.11% compared to Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings's net margin of 14.41%. Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings's return on equity of -13.01% beat Build-A-Bear Workshop's return on equity of 39.75%.

Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings has a consensus price target of $3.30, signalling upside risk potential of 197.3%. On the other hand Build-A-Bear Workshop has an analysts' consensus of $54.33 which suggests that it could grow by 48.9%. Given that Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings has higher upside potential than Build-A-Bear Workshop, analysts believe Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings is more attractive than Build-A-Bear Workshop.

Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings has a beta of 0.525, which suggesting that the stock is 47.493% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Build-A-Bear Workshop has a beta of 1.497, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.726%.

Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Build-A-Bear Workshop offers a yield of 2.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Build-A-Bear Workshop pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings quarterly revenues are $324.3M, which are larger than Build-A-Bear Workshop quarterly revenues of $150.4M. Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings's net income of -$364K is lower than Build-A-Bear Workshop's net income of $21.7M. Notably, Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Build-A-Bear Workshop's PE ratio is 9.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings is 0.03x versus 1.00x for Build-A-Bear Workshop. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Big 5 Sporting Goods has a net margin of -0.11% compared to Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings's net margin of -11.5%. Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings's return on equity of -13.01% beat Big 5 Sporting Goods's return on equity of -32.09%.

Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings has a consensus price target of $3.30, signalling upside risk potential of 197.3%. On the other hand Big 5 Sporting Goods has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 354.55%. Given that Big 5 Sporting Goods has higher upside potential than Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, analysts believe Big 5 Sporting Goods is more attractive than Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings.

Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings has a beta of 0.525, which suggesting that the stock is 47.493% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Big 5 Sporting Goods has a beta of 2.232, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 123.158%.

Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Big 5 Sporting Goods offers a yield of 47.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Big 5 Sporting Goods pays out -4.1% of its earnings as a dividend.

Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings quarterly revenues are $324.3M, which are larger than Big 5 Sporting Goods quarterly revenues of $181.6M. Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings's net income of -$364K is higher than Big 5 Sporting Goods's net income of -$20.9M. Notably, Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Big 5 Sporting Goods's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings is 0.03x versus 0.03x for Big 5 Sporting Goods. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Dick's Sporting Goods has a net margin of -0.11% compared to Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings's net margin of 7.7%. Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings's return on equity of -13.01% beat Dick's Sporting Goods's return on equity of 40.21%.

Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings has a consensus price target of $3.30, signalling upside risk potential of 197.3%. On the other hand Dick's Sporting Goods has an analysts' consensus of $234.40 which suggests that it could grow by 20.51%. Given that Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings has higher upside potential than Dick's Sporting Goods, analysts believe Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings is more attractive than Dick's Sporting Goods.

Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings has a beta of 0.525, which suggesting that the stock is 47.493% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dick's Sporting Goods has a beta of 1.536, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.609%.

Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Dick's Sporting Goods offers a yield of 2.26% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.10 per share. Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Dick's Sporting Goods pays out 31.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Dick's Sporting Goods's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings quarterly revenues are $324.3M, which are smaller than Dick's Sporting Goods quarterly revenues of $3.9B. Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings's net income of -$364K is lower than Dick's Sporting Goods's net income of $300M. Notably, Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Dick's Sporting Goods's PE ratio is 13.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings is 0.03x versus 1.20x for Dick's Sporting Goods. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

GHST World has a net margin of -0.11% compared to Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings's net margin of -938.3%. Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings's return on equity of -13.01% beat GHST World's return on equity of --.

Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings has a consensus price target of $3.30, signalling upside risk potential of 197.3%. On the other hand GHST World has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings has higher upside potential than GHST World, analysts believe Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings is more attractive than GHST World.

Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings has a beta of 0.525, which suggesting that the stock is 47.493% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GHST World has a beta of 0.159, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 84.118%.

Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. GHST World offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. GHST World pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings quarterly revenues are $324.3M, which are larger than GHST World quarterly revenues of $4.9K. Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings's net income of -$364K is lower than GHST World's net income of -$45.7K. Notably, Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while GHST World's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings is 0.03x versus 160.28x for GHST World. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.