ASO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Brilliant Earth Group has a net margin of 4.9% compared to Academy Sports and Outdoors's net margin of 0.3%. Academy Sports and Outdoors's return on equity of 23.67% beat Brilliant Earth Group's return on equity of 0.53%.

Academy Sports and Outdoors has a consensus price target of $60.06, signalling upside risk potential of 27.82%. On the other hand Brilliant Earth Group has an analysts' consensus of $2.13 which suggests that it could grow by 44.56%. Given that Brilliant Earth Group has higher upside potential than Academy Sports and Outdoors, analysts believe Brilliant Earth Group is more attractive than Academy Sports and Outdoors.

Academy Sports and Outdoors has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Brilliant Earth Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Academy Sports and Outdoors has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.93%. Brilliant Earth Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Academy Sports and Outdoors pays 5.24% of its earnings as a dividend. Brilliant Earth Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Academy Sports and Outdoors's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Academy Sports and Outdoors quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Brilliant Earth Group quarterly revenues of $119.5M. Academy Sports and Outdoors's net income of $65.8M is higher than Brilliant Earth Group's net income of $358K. Notably, Academy Sports and Outdoors's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.81x while Brilliant Earth Group's PE ratio is 49.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Academy Sports and Outdoors is 0.58x versus 0.27x for Brilliant Earth Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Charles & Colvard has a net margin of 4.9% compared to Academy Sports and Outdoors's net margin of -69.04%. Academy Sports and Outdoors's return on equity of 23.67% beat Charles & Colvard's return on equity of -47.77%.

Academy Sports and Outdoors has a consensus price target of $60.06, signalling upside risk potential of 27.82%. On the other hand Charles & Colvard has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1011.34%. Given that Charles & Colvard has higher upside potential than Academy Sports and Outdoors, analysts believe Charles & Colvard is more attractive than Academy Sports and Outdoors.

Academy Sports and Outdoors has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Charles & Colvard has a beta of 1.274, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.424%.

Academy Sports and Outdoors has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.93%. Charles & Colvard offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Academy Sports and Outdoors pays 5.24% of its earnings as a dividend. Charles & Colvard pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Academy Sports and Outdoors's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Academy Sports and Outdoors quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Charles & Colvard quarterly revenues of $5.3M. Academy Sports and Outdoors's net income of $65.8M is higher than Charles & Colvard's net income of -$3.6M. Notably, Academy Sports and Outdoors's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.81x while Charles & Colvard's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Academy Sports and Outdoors is 0.58x versus 0.13x for Charles & Colvard. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

OneWater Marine has a net margin of 4.9% compared to Academy Sports and Outdoors's net margin of -3.19%. Academy Sports and Outdoors's return on equity of 23.67% beat OneWater Marine's return on equity of -2.71%.

Academy Sports and Outdoors has a consensus price target of $60.06, signalling upside risk potential of 27.82%. On the other hand OneWater Marine has an analysts' consensus of $22.20 which suggests that it could grow by 26.57%. Given that Academy Sports and Outdoors has higher upside potential than OneWater Marine, analysts believe Academy Sports and Outdoors is more attractive than OneWater Marine.

Academy Sports and Outdoors has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison OneWater Marine has a beta of 2.587, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 158.696%.

Academy Sports and Outdoors has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.93%. OneWater Marine offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Academy Sports and Outdoors pays 5.24% of its earnings as a dividend. OneWater Marine pays out -94.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Academy Sports and Outdoors's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Academy Sports and Outdoors quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than OneWater Marine quarterly revenues of $375.8M. Academy Sports and Outdoors's net income of $65.8M is higher than OneWater Marine's net income of -$12M. Notably, Academy Sports and Outdoors's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.81x while OneWater Marine's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Academy Sports and Outdoors is 0.58x versus 0.14x for OneWater Marine. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings has a net margin of 4.9% compared to Academy Sports and Outdoors's net margin of -0.11%. Academy Sports and Outdoors's return on equity of 23.67% beat Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings's return on equity of -13.01%.

Academy Sports and Outdoors has a consensus price target of $60.06, signalling upside risk potential of 27.82%. On the other hand Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $3.30 which suggests that it could grow by 233.91%. Given that Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings has higher upside potential than Academy Sports and Outdoors, analysts believe Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings is more attractive than Academy Sports and Outdoors.

Academy Sports and Outdoors has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings has a beta of 0.525, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.493%.

Academy Sports and Outdoors has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.93%. Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Academy Sports and Outdoors pays 5.24% of its earnings as a dividend. Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Academy Sports and Outdoors's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Academy Sports and Outdoors quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings quarterly revenues of $324.3M. Academy Sports and Outdoors's net income of $65.8M is higher than Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings's net income of -$364K. Notably, Academy Sports and Outdoors's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.81x while Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Academy Sports and Outdoors is 0.58x versus 0.03x for Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.