SIEB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Mawson Infrastructure Group has a net margin of 17.53% compared to Siebert Financial's net margin of -99.28%. Siebert Financial's return on equity of 14.12% beat Mawson Infrastructure Group's return on equity of -315.99%.

Siebert Financial has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Mawson Infrastructure Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 397.51%. Given that Mawson Infrastructure Group has higher upside potential than Siebert Financial, analysts believe Mawson Infrastructure Group is more attractive than Siebert Financial.

Siebert Financial has a beta of 0.303, which suggesting that the stock is 69.738% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mawson Infrastructure Group has a beta of 3.697, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 269.725%.

Siebert Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mawson Infrastructure Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Siebert Financial pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mawson Infrastructure Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Siebert Financial quarterly revenues are $21.8M, which are larger than Mawson Infrastructure Group quarterly revenues of $12.3M. Siebert Financial's net income of $3.8M is higher than Mawson Infrastructure Group's net income of -$12.2M. Notably, Siebert Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.55x while Mawson Infrastructure Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Siebert Financial is 1.71x versus 0.18x for Mawson Infrastructure Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MarketAxess Holdings has a net margin of 17.53% compared to Siebert Financial's net margin of 32.18%. Siebert Financial's return on equity of 14.12% beat MarketAxess Holdings's return on equity of 20.42%.

Siebert Financial has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand MarketAxess Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $232.75 which suggests that it could grow by 6.28%. Given that MarketAxess Holdings has higher upside potential than Siebert Financial, analysts believe MarketAxess Holdings is more attractive than Siebert Financial.

Siebert Financial has a beta of 0.303, which suggesting that the stock is 69.738% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MarketAxess Holdings has a beta of 1.117, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.679%.

Siebert Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MarketAxess Holdings offers a yield of 1.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share. Siebert Financial pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MarketAxess Holdings pays out 41.1% of its earnings as a dividend. MarketAxess Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Siebert Financial quarterly revenues are $21.8M, which are smaller than MarketAxess Holdings quarterly revenues of $202.4M. Siebert Financial's net income of $3.8M is lower than MarketAxess Holdings's net income of $65.1M. Notably, Siebert Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.55x while MarketAxess Holdings's PE ratio is 30.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Siebert Financial is 1.71x versus 10.10x for MarketAxess Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Riot Platforms has a net margin of 17.53% compared to Siebert Financial's net margin of 95.71%. Siebert Financial's return on equity of 14.12% beat Riot Platforms's return on equity of 4.26%.

Siebert Financial has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Riot Platforms has an analysts' consensus of $16.43 which suggests that it could grow by 111.5%. Given that Riot Platforms has higher upside potential than Siebert Financial, analysts believe Riot Platforms is more attractive than Siebert Financial.

Siebert Financial has a beta of 0.303, which suggesting that the stock is 69.738% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Riot Platforms has a beta of 4.599, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 359.878%.

Siebert Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Riot Platforms offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Siebert Financial pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Riot Platforms pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Siebert Financial quarterly revenues are $21.8M, which are smaller than Riot Platforms quarterly revenues of $142.6M. Siebert Financial's net income of $3.8M is lower than Riot Platforms's net income of $136.4M. Notably, Siebert Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.55x while Riot Platforms's PE ratio is 22.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Siebert Financial is 1.71x versus 5.97x for Riot Platforms. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Soluna Holdings has a net margin of 17.53% compared to Siebert Financial's net margin of -95.55%. Siebert Financial's return on equity of 14.12% beat Soluna Holdings's return on equity of -57.92%.

Siebert Financial has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Soluna Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Siebert Financial has higher upside potential than Soluna Holdings, analysts believe Siebert Financial is more attractive than Soluna Holdings.

Siebert Financial has a beta of 0.303, which suggesting that the stock is 69.738% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Soluna Holdings has a beta of 3.599, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 259.886%.

Siebert Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Soluna Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Siebert Financial pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Soluna Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Siebert Financial quarterly revenues are $21.8M, which are larger than Soluna Holdings quarterly revenues of $7.5M. Siebert Financial's net income of $3.8M is higher than Soluna Holdings's net income of -$7.2M. Notably, Siebert Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.55x while Soluna Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Siebert Financial is 1.71x versus 0.15x for Soluna Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.