MKTX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Interactive Brokers Group has a net margin of 32.18% compared to MarketAxess Holdings's net margin of 9.22%. MarketAxess Holdings's return on equity of 20.42% beat Interactive Brokers Group's return on equity of 4.96%.

MarketAxess Holdings has a consensus price target of $232.75, signalling upside risk potential of 6.28%. On the other hand Interactive Brokers Group has an analysts' consensus of $192.50 which suggests that it could grow by 13.72%. Given that Interactive Brokers Group has higher upside potential than MarketAxess Holdings, analysts believe Interactive Brokers Group is more attractive than MarketAxess Holdings.

MarketAxess Holdings has a beta of 1.117, which suggesting that the stock is 11.679% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Interactive Brokers Group has a beta of 1.022, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.194%.

MarketAxess Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.36%. Interactive Brokers Group offers a yield of 0.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. MarketAxess Holdings pays 41.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Interactive Brokers Group pays out 12.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MarketAxess Holdings quarterly revenues are $202.4M, which are smaller than Interactive Brokers Group quarterly revenues of $2.3B. MarketAxess Holdings's net income of $65.1M is lower than Interactive Brokers Group's net income of $213M. Notably, MarketAxess Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.12x while Interactive Brokers Group's PE ratio is 23.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MarketAxess Holdings is 10.10x versus 1.96x for Interactive Brokers Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Morgan Stanley has a net margin of 32.18% compared to MarketAxess Holdings's net margin of 26.13%. MarketAxess Holdings's return on equity of 20.42% beat Morgan Stanley's return on equity of 13.08%.

MarketAxess Holdings has a consensus price target of $232.75, signalling upside risk potential of 6.28%. On the other hand Morgan Stanley has an analysts' consensus of $125.44 which suggests that it could grow by 8.13%. Given that Morgan Stanley has higher upside potential than MarketAxess Holdings, analysts believe Morgan Stanley is more attractive than MarketAxess Holdings.

MarketAxess Holdings has a beta of 1.117, which suggesting that the stock is 11.679% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Morgan Stanley has a beta of 1.296, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.648%.

MarketAxess Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.36%. Morgan Stanley offers a yield of 3.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.93 per share. MarketAxess Holdings pays 41.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Morgan Stanley pays out 45.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MarketAxess Holdings quarterly revenues are $202.4M, which are smaller than Morgan Stanley quarterly revenues of $16.5B. MarketAxess Holdings's net income of $65.1M is lower than Morgan Stanley's net income of $4.3B. Notably, MarketAxess Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.12x while Morgan Stanley's PE ratio is 13.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MarketAxess Holdings is 10.10x versus 3.11x for Morgan Stanley. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Charles Schwab has a net margin of 32.18% compared to MarketAxess Holdings's net margin of 34.1%. MarketAxess Holdings's return on equity of 20.42% beat Charles Schwab's return on equity of 13.33%.

MarketAxess Holdings has a consensus price target of $232.75, signalling upside risk potential of 6.28%. On the other hand Charles Schwab has an analysts' consensus of $89.10 which suggests that it could grow by 11.46%. Given that Charles Schwab has higher upside potential than MarketAxess Holdings, analysts believe Charles Schwab is more attractive than MarketAxess Holdings.

MarketAxess Holdings has a beta of 1.117, which suggesting that the stock is 11.679% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Charles Schwab has a beta of 0.909, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.098%.

MarketAxess Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.36%. Charles Schwab offers a yield of 1.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. MarketAxess Holdings pays 41.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Charles Schwab pays out 38.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MarketAxess Holdings quarterly revenues are $202.4M, which are smaller than Charles Schwab quarterly revenues of $5.6B. MarketAxess Holdings's net income of $65.1M is lower than Charles Schwab's net income of $1.9B. Notably, MarketAxess Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.12x while Charles Schwab's PE ratio is 24.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MarketAxess Holdings is 10.10x versus 7.16x for Charles Schwab. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Virtu Financial has a net margin of 32.18% compared to MarketAxess Holdings's net margin of 11.9%. MarketAxess Holdings's return on equity of 20.42% beat Virtu Financial's return on equity of 21.87%.

MarketAxess Holdings has a consensus price target of $232.75, signalling upside risk potential of 6.28%. On the other hand Virtu Financial has an analysts' consensus of $41.67 which suggests that it could grow by 8.62%. Given that Virtu Financial has higher upside potential than MarketAxess Holdings, analysts believe Virtu Financial is more attractive than MarketAxess Holdings.

MarketAxess Holdings has a beta of 1.117, which suggesting that the stock is 11.679% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Virtu Financial has a beta of 0.712, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.839%.

MarketAxess Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.36%. Virtu Financial offers a yield of 2.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. MarketAxess Holdings pays 41.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Virtu Financial pays out 108.32% of its earnings as a dividend. MarketAxess Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Virtu Financial's is not.

MarketAxess Holdings quarterly revenues are $202.4M, which are smaller than Virtu Financial quarterly revenues of $837.9M. MarketAxess Holdings's net income of $65.1M is lower than Virtu Financial's net income of $99.7M. Notably, MarketAxess Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.12x while Virtu Financial's PE ratio is 11.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MarketAxess Holdings is 10.10x versus 1.09x for Virtu Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.