IBKR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

BlackRock has a net margin of 8.96% compared to Interactive Brokers Group's net margin of 29.42%. Interactive Brokers Group's return on equity of 4.93% beat BlackRock's return on equity of 14.59%.

Interactive Brokers Group has a consensus price target of $225.50, signalling upside risk potential of 40.04%. On the other hand BlackRock has an analysts' consensus of $1,159.26 which suggests that it could grow by 28.74%. Given that Interactive Brokers Group has higher upside potential than BlackRock, analysts believe Interactive Brokers Group is more attractive than BlackRock.

Interactive Brokers Group has a beta of 0.992, which suggesting that the stock is 0.768% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BlackRock has a beta of 1.288, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.789%.

Interactive Brokers Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.62%. BlackRock offers a yield of 2.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $5.21 per share. Interactive Brokers Group pays 12.19% of its earnings as a dividend. BlackRock pays out 48.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Interactive Brokers Group quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are smaller than BlackRock quarterly revenues of $5.7B. Interactive Brokers Group's net income of $217M is lower than BlackRock's net income of $1.7B. Notably, Interactive Brokers Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.27x while BlackRock's PE ratio is 21.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Interactive Brokers Group is 1.88x versus 6.69x for BlackRock. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Robinhood Markets has a net margin of 8.96% compared to Interactive Brokers Group's net margin of 90.34%. Interactive Brokers Group's return on equity of 4.93% beat Robinhood Markets's return on equity of 19.66%.

Interactive Brokers Group has a consensus price target of $225.50, signalling upside risk potential of 40.04%. On the other hand Robinhood Markets has an analysts' consensus of $67.24 which suggests that it could grow by 86.67%. Given that Robinhood Markets has higher upside potential than Interactive Brokers Group, analysts believe Robinhood Markets is more attractive than Interactive Brokers Group.

Interactive Brokers Group has a beta of 0.992, which suggesting that the stock is 0.768% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Robinhood Markets has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Interactive Brokers Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.62%. Robinhood Markets offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Interactive Brokers Group pays 12.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Robinhood Markets pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Interactive Brokers Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Interactive Brokers Group quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are larger than Robinhood Markets quarterly revenues of $1B. Interactive Brokers Group's net income of $217M is lower than Robinhood Markets's net income of $916M. Notably, Interactive Brokers Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.27x while Robinhood Markets's PE ratio is 22.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Interactive Brokers Group is 1.88x versus 11.19x for Robinhood Markets. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Morgan Stanley has a net margin of 8.96% compared to Interactive Brokers Group's net margin of 24.69%. Interactive Brokers Group's return on equity of 4.93% beat Morgan Stanley's return on equity of 13.08%.

Interactive Brokers Group has a consensus price target of $225.50, signalling upside risk potential of 40.04%. On the other hand Morgan Stanley has an analysts' consensus of $138.33 which suggests that it could grow by 23.87%. Given that Interactive Brokers Group has higher upside potential than Morgan Stanley, analysts believe Interactive Brokers Group is more attractive than Morgan Stanley.

Interactive Brokers Group has a beta of 0.992, which suggesting that the stock is 0.768% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Morgan Stanley has a beta of 1.352, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.218%.

Interactive Brokers Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.62%. Morgan Stanley offers a yield of 3.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.93 per share. Interactive Brokers Group pays 12.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Morgan Stanley pays out 45.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Interactive Brokers Group quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are smaller than Morgan Stanley quarterly revenues of $15B. Interactive Brokers Group's net income of $217M is lower than Morgan Stanley's net income of $3.7B. Notably, Interactive Brokers Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.27x while Morgan Stanley's PE ratio is 14.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Interactive Brokers Group is 1.88x versus 3.12x for Morgan Stanley. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Charles Schwab has a net margin of 8.96% compared to Interactive Brokers Group's net margin of 34.53%. Interactive Brokers Group's return on equity of 4.93% beat Charles Schwab's return on equity of 13.33%.

Interactive Brokers Group has a consensus price target of $225.50, signalling upside risk potential of 40.04%. On the other hand Charles Schwab has an analysts' consensus of $90.40 which suggests that it could grow by 22.98%. Given that Interactive Brokers Group has higher upside potential than Charles Schwab, analysts believe Interactive Brokers Group is more attractive than Charles Schwab.

Interactive Brokers Group has a beta of 0.992, which suggesting that the stock is 0.768% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Charles Schwab has a beta of 0.984, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.615%.

Interactive Brokers Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.62%. Charles Schwab offers a yield of 1.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Interactive Brokers Group pays 12.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Charles Schwab pays out 38.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Interactive Brokers Group quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are smaller than Charles Schwab quarterly revenues of $5.3B. Interactive Brokers Group's net income of $217M is lower than Charles Schwab's net income of $1.8B. Notably, Interactive Brokers Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.27x while Charles Schwab's PE ratio is 24.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Interactive Brokers Group is 1.88x versus 6.88x for Charles Schwab. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.