RICK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Flanigan'S Enterprises has a net margin of 0.33% compared to RCI Hospitality Holdings's net margin of 2.3%. RCI Hospitality Holdings's return on equity of 1.09% beat Flanigan'S Enterprises's return on equity of 4.04%.

RCI Hospitality Holdings has a consensus price target of $98.00, signalling upside risk potential of 70.7%. On the other hand Flanigan'S Enterprises has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that RCI Hospitality Holdings has higher upside potential than Flanigan'S Enterprises, analysts believe RCI Hospitality Holdings is more attractive than Flanigan'S Enterprises.

RCI Hospitality Holdings has a beta of 1.605, which suggesting that the stock is 60.466% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flanigan'S Enterprises has a beta of 0.707, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.258%.

RCI Hospitality Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.45%. Flanigan'S Enterprises offers a yield of 2.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. RCI Hospitality Holdings pays 76.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Flanigan'S Enterprises pays out 20.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RCI Hospitality Holdings quarterly revenues are $73.2M, which are larger than Flanigan'S Enterprises quarterly revenues of $48.8M. RCI Hospitality Holdings's net income of $244K is lower than Flanigan'S Enterprises's net income of $1.1M. Notably, RCI Hospitality Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 179.41x while Flanigan'S Enterprises's PE ratio is 15.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RCI Hospitality Holdings is 1.80x versus 0.25x for Flanigan'S Enterprises. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Darden Restaurants has a net margin of 0.33% compared to RCI Hospitality Holdings's net margin of 7.44%. RCI Hospitality Holdings's return on equity of 1.09% beat Darden Restaurants's return on equity of 48.85%.

RCI Hospitality Holdings has a consensus price target of $98.00, signalling upside risk potential of 70.7%. On the other hand Darden Restaurants has an analysts' consensus of $193.25 which suggests that it could grow by 3.54%. Given that RCI Hospitality Holdings has higher upside potential than Darden Restaurants, analysts believe RCI Hospitality Holdings is more attractive than Darden Restaurants.

RCI Hospitality Holdings has a beta of 1.605, which suggesting that the stock is 60.466% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Darden Restaurants has a beta of 1.315, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.498%.

RCI Hospitality Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.45%. Darden Restaurants offers a yield of 2.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.40 per share. RCI Hospitality Holdings pays 76.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Darden Restaurants pays out 61.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RCI Hospitality Holdings quarterly revenues are $73.2M, which are smaller than Darden Restaurants quarterly revenues of $2.9B. RCI Hospitality Holdings's net income of $244K is lower than Darden Restaurants's net income of $215.1M. Notably, RCI Hospitality Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 179.41x while Darden Restaurants's PE ratio is 21.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RCI Hospitality Holdings is 1.80x versus 1.93x for Darden Restaurants. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Starbucks has a net margin of 0.33% compared to RCI Hospitality Holdings's net margin of 10.02%. RCI Hospitality Holdings's return on equity of 1.09% beat Starbucks's return on equity of --.

RCI Hospitality Holdings has a consensus price target of $98.00, signalling upside risk potential of 70.7%. On the other hand Starbucks has an analysts' consensus of $103.30 which suggests that it could grow by 14.9%. Given that RCI Hospitality Holdings has higher upside potential than Starbucks, analysts believe RCI Hospitality Holdings is more attractive than Starbucks.

RCI Hospitality Holdings has a beta of 1.605, which suggesting that the stock is 60.466% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Starbucks has a beta of 0.971, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.863%.

RCI Hospitality Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.45%. Starbucks offers a yield of 2.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.61 per share. RCI Hospitality Holdings pays 76.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Starbucks pays out 68.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RCI Hospitality Holdings quarterly revenues are $73.2M, which are smaller than Starbucks quarterly revenues of $9.1B. RCI Hospitality Holdings's net income of $244K is lower than Starbucks's net income of $909.2M. Notably, RCI Hospitality Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 179.41x while Starbucks's PE ratio is 27.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RCI Hospitality Holdings is 1.80x versus 2.83x for Starbucks. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Notes Live Holding has a net margin of 0.33% compared to RCI Hospitality Holdings's net margin of --. RCI Hospitality Holdings's return on equity of 1.09% beat Notes Live Holding's return on equity of --.

RCI Hospitality Holdings has a consensus price target of $98.00, signalling upside risk potential of 70.7%. On the other hand Notes Live Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that RCI Hospitality Holdings has higher upside potential than Notes Live Holding, analysts believe RCI Hospitality Holdings is more attractive than Notes Live Holding.

RCI Hospitality Holdings has a beta of 1.605, which suggesting that the stock is 60.466% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Notes Live Holding has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

RCI Hospitality Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.45%. Notes Live Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. RCI Hospitality Holdings pays 76.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Notes Live Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. RCI Hospitality Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RCI Hospitality Holdings quarterly revenues are $73.2M, which are larger than Notes Live Holding quarterly revenues of --. RCI Hospitality Holdings's net income of $244K is higher than Notes Live Holding's net income of --. Notably, RCI Hospitality Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 179.41x while Notes Live Holding's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RCI Hospitality Holdings is 1.80x versus -- for Notes Live Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.