PCT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Casella Waste Systems has a net margin of -- compared to PureCycle Technologies's net margin of 1.4%. PureCycle Technologies's return on equity of -- beat Casella Waste Systems's return on equity of 0.61%.

PureCycle Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 20.96%. On the other hand Casella Waste Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 9.47%. Given that PureCycle Technologies has higher upside potential than Casella Waste Systems, analysts believe PureCycle Technologies is more attractive than Casella Waste Systems.

PureCycle Technologies has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Casella Waste Systems has a beta of 1.015, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.517%.

PureCycle Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Casella Waste Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PureCycle Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Casella Waste Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

PureCycle Technologies quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Casella Waste Systems quarterly revenues of $411.6M. PureCycle Technologies's net income of -$90.6M is lower than Casella Waste Systems's net income of $5.8M. Notably, PureCycle Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Casella Waste Systems's PE ratio is 883.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PureCycle Technologies is -- versus 4.15x for Casella Waste Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

LanzaTech Global has a net margin of -- compared to PureCycle Technologies's net margin of -577.6%. PureCycle Technologies's return on equity of -- beat LanzaTech Global's return on equity of -155.58%.

PureCycle Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 20.96%. On the other hand LanzaTech Global has an analysts' consensus of $3.75 which suggests that it could grow by 267.65%. Given that LanzaTech Global has higher upside potential than PureCycle Technologies, analysts believe LanzaTech Global is more attractive than PureCycle Technologies.

PureCycle Technologies has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LanzaTech Global has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

PureCycle Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. LanzaTech Global offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PureCycle Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. LanzaTech Global pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

PureCycle Technologies quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than LanzaTech Global quarterly revenues of $9.9M. PureCycle Technologies's net income of -$90.6M is lower than LanzaTech Global's net income of -$57.4M. Notably, PureCycle Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while LanzaTech Global's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PureCycle Technologies is -- versus 3.46x for LanzaTech Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Perma-Fix Environmental Services has a net margin of -- compared to PureCycle Technologies's net margin of -53.41%. PureCycle Technologies's return on equity of -- beat Perma-Fix Environmental Services's return on equity of -39.49%.

PureCycle Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 20.96%. On the other hand Perma-Fix Environmental Services has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 102.21%. Given that Perma-Fix Environmental Services has higher upside potential than PureCycle Technologies, analysts believe Perma-Fix Environmental Services is more attractive than PureCycle Technologies.

PureCycle Technologies has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Perma-Fix Environmental Services has a beta of 0.419, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.12%.

PureCycle Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Perma-Fix Environmental Services offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PureCycle Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Perma-Fix Environmental Services pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

PureCycle Technologies quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Perma-Fix Environmental Services quarterly revenues of $16.8M. PureCycle Technologies's net income of -$90.6M is lower than Perma-Fix Environmental Services's net income of -$9M. Notably, PureCycle Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Perma-Fix Environmental Services's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PureCycle Technologies is -- versus 2.34x for Perma-Fix Environmental Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Republic Services has a net margin of -- compared to PureCycle Technologies's net margin of 13.88%. PureCycle Technologies's return on equity of -- beat Republic Services's return on equity of 18.27%.

PureCycle Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 20.96%. On the other hand Republic Services has an analysts' consensus of $221.77 which suggests that it could grow by 8.86%. Given that PureCycle Technologies has higher upside potential than Republic Services, analysts believe PureCycle Technologies is more attractive than Republic Services.

PureCycle Technologies has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Republic Services has a beta of 0.714, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.556%.

PureCycle Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Republic Services offers a yield of 1.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share. PureCycle Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Republic Services pays out 36.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Republic Services's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PureCycle Technologies quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Republic Services quarterly revenues of $4.1B. PureCycle Technologies's net income of -$90.6M is lower than Republic Services's net income of $565.7M. Notably, PureCycle Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Republic Services's PE ratio is 32.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PureCycle Technologies is -- versus 4.06x for Republic Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.