NEOV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Amprius Technologies has a net margin of -90.63% compared to NeoVolta's net margin of -113.83%. NeoVolta's return on equity of -72.02% beat Amprius Technologies's return on equity of -71.97%.

NeoVolta has a consensus price target of $7.50, signalling upside risk potential of 185.17%. On the other hand Amprius Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $8.86 which suggests that it could grow by 184.8%. Given that NeoVolta has higher upside potential than Amprius Technologies, analysts believe NeoVolta is more attractive than Amprius Technologies.

NeoVolta has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Amprius Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

NeoVolta has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Amprius Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NeoVolta pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Amprius Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

NeoVolta quarterly revenues are $1.1M, which are smaller than Amprius Technologies quarterly revenues of $10M. NeoVolta's net income of -$971.1K is higher than Amprius Technologies's net income of -$11.4M. Notably, NeoVolta's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Amprius Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NeoVolta is 34.64x versus 13.44x for Amprius Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

EnerSys has a net margin of -90.63% compared to NeoVolta's net margin of 12.67%. NeoVolta's return on equity of -72.02% beat EnerSys's return on equity of 18.25%.

NeoVolta has a consensus price target of $7.50, signalling upside risk potential of 185.17%. On the other hand EnerSys has an analysts' consensus of $115.15 which suggests that it could grow by 19.62%. Given that NeoVolta has higher upside potential than EnerSys, analysts believe NeoVolta is more attractive than EnerSys.

NeoVolta has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EnerSys has a beta of 1.181, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.08%.

NeoVolta has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. EnerSys offers a yield of 0.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. NeoVolta pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. EnerSys pays out 12.81% of its earnings as a dividend. EnerSys's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NeoVolta quarterly revenues are $1.1M, which are smaller than EnerSys quarterly revenues of $906.2M. NeoVolta's net income of -$971.1K is lower than EnerSys's net income of $114.8M. Notably, NeoVolta's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while EnerSys's PE ratio is 11.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NeoVolta is 34.64x versus 1.10x for EnerSys. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Flux Power Holdings has a net margin of -90.63% compared to NeoVolta's net margin of -11.21%. NeoVolta's return on equity of -72.02% beat Flux Power Holdings's return on equity of -490.96%.

NeoVolta has a consensus price target of $7.50, signalling upside risk potential of 185.17%. On the other hand Flux Power Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $4.50 which suggests that it could grow by 132.2%. Given that NeoVolta has higher upside potential than Flux Power Holdings, analysts believe NeoVolta is more attractive than Flux Power Holdings.

NeoVolta has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flux Power Holdings has a beta of 1.294, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.375%.

NeoVolta has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Flux Power Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NeoVolta pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Flux Power Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

NeoVolta quarterly revenues are $1.1M, which are smaller than Flux Power Holdings quarterly revenues of $16.8M. NeoVolta's net income of -$971.1K is higher than Flux Power Holdings's net income of -$1.9M. Notably, NeoVolta's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Flux Power Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NeoVolta is 34.64x versus 0.53x for Flux Power Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Preformed Line Products has a net margin of -90.63% compared to NeoVolta's net margin of 6.25%. NeoVolta's return on equity of -72.02% beat Preformed Line Products's return on equity of 8.84%.

NeoVolta has a consensus price target of $7.50, signalling upside risk potential of 185.17%. On the other hand Preformed Line Products has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that NeoVolta has higher upside potential than Preformed Line Products, analysts believe NeoVolta is more attractive than Preformed Line Products.

NeoVolta has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Preformed Line Products has a beta of 0.615, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.513%.

NeoVolta has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Preformed Line Products offers a yield of 0.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. NeoVolta pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Preformed Line Products pays out 10.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Preformed Line Products's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NeoVolta quarterly revenues are $1.1M, which are smaller than Preformed Line Products quarterly revenues of $167.1M. NeoVolta's net income of -$971.1K is lower than Preformed Line Products's net income of $10.5M. Notably, NeoVolta's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Preformed Line Products's PE ratio is 18.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NeoVolta is 34.64x versus 1.18x for Preformed Line Products. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.