FLUX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Amprius Technologies has a net margin of -18.26% compared to Flux Power Holdings's net margin of -138.13%. Flux Power Holdings's return on equity of -88.11% beat Amprius Technologies's return on equity of -70.1%.

Flux Power Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 304.62%. On the other hand Amprius Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 277.19%. Given that Flux Power Holdings has higher upside potential than Amprius Technologies, analysts believe Flux Power Holdings is more attractive than Amprius Technologies.

Flux Power Holdings has a beta of 1.087, which suggesting that the stock is 8.678% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Amprius Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Flux Power Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Amprius Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Flux Power Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Amprius Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Flux Power Holdings quarterly revenues are $14.5M, which are larger than Amprius Technologies quarterly revenues of $7.9M. Flux Power Holdings's net income of -$2.6M is higher than Amprius Technologies's net income of -$10.9M. Notably, Flux Power Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Amprius Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flux Power Holdings is 0.44x versus 10.65x for Amprius Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

EnerSys has a net margin of -18.26% compared to Flux Power Holdings's net margin of 9.31%. Flux Power Holdings's return on equity of -88.11% beat EnerSys's return on equity of 16.44%.

Flux Power Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 304.62%. On the other hand EnerSys has an analysts' consensus of $103.67 which suggests that it could grow by 24.28%. Given that Flux Power Holdings has higher upside potential than EnerSys, analysts believe Flux Power Holdings is more attractive than EnerSys.

Flux Power Holdings has a beta of 1.087, which suggesting that the stock is 8.678% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EnerSys has a beta of 1.220, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.971%.

Flux Power Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. EnerSys offers a yield of 1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Flux Power Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. EnerSys pays out 12.81% of its earnings as a dividend. EnerSys's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Flux Power Holdings quarterly revenues are $14.5M, which are smaller than EnerSys quarterly revenues of $883.7M. Flux Power Holdings's net income of -$2.6M is lower than EnerSys's net income of $82.3M. Notably, Flux Power Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while EnerSys's PE ratio is 13.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flux Power Holdings is 0.44x versus 1.08x for EnerSys. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NeoVolta has a net margin of -18.26% compared to Flux Power Holdings's net margin of -163.41%. Flux Power Holdings's return on equity of -88.11% beat NeoVolta's return on equity of -55.85%.

Flux Power Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 304.62%. On the other hand NeoVolta has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 58.23%. Given that Flux Power Holdings has higher upside potential than NeoVolta, analysts believe Flux Power Holdings is more attractive than NeoVolta.

Flux Power Holdings has a beta of 1.087, which suggesting that the stock is 8.678% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NeoVolta has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Flux Power Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NeoVolta offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Flux Power Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NeoVolta pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Flux Power Holdings quarterly revenues are $14.5M, which are larger than NeoVolta quarterly revenues of $590.2K. Flux Power Holdings's net income of -$2.6M is lower than NeoVolta's net income of -$964.5K. Notably, Flux Power Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NeoVolta's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flux Power Holdings is 0.44x versus 63.75x for NeoVolta. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Preformed Line Products has a net margin of -18.26% compared to Flux Power Holdings's net margin of 5.23%. Flux Power Holdings's return on equity of -88.11% beat Preformed Line Products's return on equity of 7.95%.

Flux Power Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 304.62%. On the other hand Preformed Line Products has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Flux Power Holdings has higher upside potential than Preformed Line Products, analysts believe Flux Power Holdings is more attractive than Preformed Line Products.

Flux Power Holdings has a beta of 1.087, which suggesting that the stock is 8.678% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Preformed Line Products has a beta of 0.596, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.356%.

Flux Power Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Preformed Line Products offers a yield of 0.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Flux Power Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Preformed Line Products pays out 6.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Preformed Line Products's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Flux Power Holdings quarterly revenues are $14.5M, which are smaller than Preformed Line Products quarterly revenues of $147M. Flux Power Holdings's net income of -$2.6M is lower than Preformed Line Products's net income of $7.7M. Notably, Flux Power Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Preformed Line Products's PE ratio is 19.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flux Power Holdings is 0.44x versus 1.11x for Preformed Line Products. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.