MBLY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

China Automotive Systems has a net margin of -558.64% compared to Mobileye Global's net margin of 3.35%. Mobileye Global's return on equity of -20.71% beat China Automotive Systems's return on equity of 8.37%.

Mobileye Global has a consensus price target of $20.23, signalling upside risk potential of 29.26%. On the other hand China Automotive Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 94.3%. Given that China Automotive Systems has higher upside potential than Mobileye Global, analysts believe China Automotive Systems is more attractive than Mobileye Global.

Mobileye Global has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Automotive Systems has a beta of 2.352, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 135.155%.

Mobileye Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. China Automotive Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share. Mobileye Global pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Automotive Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mobileye Global quarterly revenues are $486M, which are larger than China Automotive Systems quarterly revenues of $164.2M. Mobileye Global's net income of -$2.7B is lower than China Automotive Systems's net income of $5.5M. Notably, Mobileye Global's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while China Automotive Systems's PE ratio is 3.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mobileye Global is 7.02x versus 0.19x for China Automotive Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Commercial Vehicle Group has a net margin of -558.64% compared to Mobileye Global's net margin of 5.54%. Mobileye Global's return on equity of -20.71% beat Commercial Vehicle Group's return on equity of 20.22%.

Mobileye Global has a consensus price target of $20.23, signalling upside risk potential of 29.26%. On the other hand Commercial Vehicle Group has an analysts' consensus of $6.33 which suggests that it could grow by 203.03%. Given that Commercial Vehicle Group has higher upside potential than Mobileye Global, analysts believe Commercial Vehicle Group is more attractive than Mobileye Global.

Mobileye Global has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Commercial Vehicle Group has a beta of 2.383, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 138.268%.

Mobileye Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Commercial Vehicle Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mobileye Global pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Commercial Vehicle Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mobileye Global quarterly revenues are $486M, which are larger than Commercial Vehicle Group quarterly revenues of $171.8M. Mobileye Global's net income of -$2.7B is lower than Commercial Vehicle Group's net income of $9.5M. Notably, Mobileye Global's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Commercial Vehicle Group's PE ratio is 2.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mobileye Global is 7.02x versus 0.07x for Commercial Vehicle Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Dorman Products has a net margin of -558.64% compared to Mobileye Global's net margin of 10.97%. Mobileye Global's return on equity of -20.71% beat Dorman Products's return on equity of 15.73%.

Mobileye Global has a consensus price target of $20.23, signalling upside risk potential of 29.26%. On the other hand Dorman Products has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 13.76%. Given that Mobileye Global has higher upside potential than Dorman Products, analysts believe Mobileye Global is more attractive than Dorman Products.

Mobileye Global has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dorman Products has a beta of 0.889, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.145%.

Mobileye Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Dorman Products offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mobileye Global pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Dorman Products pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mobileye Global quarterly revenues are $486M, which are smaller than Dorman Products quarterly revenues of $503.8M. Mobileye Global's net income of -$2.7B is lower than Dorman Products's net income of $55.3M. Notably, Mobileye Global's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Dorman Products's PE ratio is 20.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mobileye Global is 7.02x versus 1.93x for Dorman Products. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hyliion Holdings has a net margin of -558.64% compared to Mobileye Global's net margin of --. Mobileye Global's return on equity of -20.71% beat Hyliion Holdings's return on equity of --.

Mobileye Global has a consensus price target of $20.23, signalling upside risk potential of 29.26%. On the other hand Hyliion Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -10.31%. Given that Mobileye Global has higher upside potential than Hyliion Holdings, analysts believe Mobileye Global is more attractive than Hyliion Holdings.

Mobileye Global has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyliion Holdings has a beta of 2.097, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 109.703%.

Mobileye Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hyliion Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mobileye Global pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hyliion Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mobileye Global quarterly revenues are $486M, which are larger than Hyliion Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Mobileye Global's net income of -$2.7B is lower than Hyliion Holdings's net income of -$11.2M. Notably, Mobileye Global's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hyliion Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mobileye Global is 7.02x versus 223.64x for Hyliion Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.