LULU Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Damon has a net margin of 14.68% compared to Lululemon Athletica's net margin of -12833.85%. Lululemon Athletica's return on equity of 43.4% beat Damon's return on equity of --.

Lululemon Athletica has a consensus price target of $395.40, signalling upside risk potential of 15.77%. On the other hand Damon has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Lululemon Athletica has higher upside potential than Damon, analysts believe Lululemon Athletica is more attractive than Damon.

Lululemon Athletica has a beta of 1.209, which suggesting that the stock is 20.916% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Damon has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Lululemon Athletica has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Damon offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lululemon Athletica pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Damon pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lululemon Athletica quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are larger than Damon quarterly revenues of $80.3K. Lululemon Athletica's net income of $351.9M is higher than Damon's net income of -$10.3M. Notably, Lululemon Athletica's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.68x while Damon's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lululemon Athletica is 4.20x versus -- for Damon. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Summit Networks has a net margin of 14.68% compared to Lululemon Athletica's net margin of 15.98%. Lululemon Athletica's return on equity of 43.4% beat Summit Networks's return on equity of -40.17%.

Lululemon Athletica has a consensus price target of $395.40, signalling upside risk potential of 15.77%. On the other hand Summit Networks has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Lululemon Athletica has higher upside potential than Summit Networks, analysts believe Lululemon Athletica is more attractive than Summit Networks.

Lululemon Athletica has a beta of 1.209, which suggesting that the stock is 20.916% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Summit Networks has a beta of 7.411, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 641.149%.

Lululemon Athletica has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Summit Networks offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lululemon Athletica pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Summit Networks pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lululemon Athletica quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are larger than Summit Networks quarterly revenues of -$73.9K. Lululemon Athletica's net income of $351.9M is higher than Summit Networks's net income of -$11.8K. Notably, Lululemon Athletica's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.68x while Summit Networks's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lululemon Athletica is 4.20x versus -- for Summit Networks. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Urban Outfitters has a net margin of 14.68% compared to Lululemon Athletica's net margin of 7.35%. Lululemon Athletica's return on equity of 43.4% beat Urban Outfitters's return on equity of 17.74%.

Lululemon Athletica has a consensus price target of $395.40, signalling upside risk potential of 15.77%. On the other hand Urban Outfitters has an analysts' consensus of $59.69 which suggests that it could grow by 15.19%. Given that Lululemon Athletica has higher upside potential than Urban Outfitters, analysts believe Lululemon Athletica is more attractive than Urban Outfitters.

Lululemon Athletica has a beta of 1.209, which suggesting that the stock is 20.916% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Urban Outfitters has a beta of 1.560, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.989%.

Lululemon Athletica has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Urban Outfitters offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lululemon Athletica pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Urban Outfitters pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lululemon Athletica quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are larger than Urban Outfitters quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Lululemon Athletica's net income of $351.9M is higher than Urban Outfitters's net income of $120.3M. Notably, Lululemon Athletica's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.68x while Urban Outfitters's PE ratio is 12.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lululemon Athletica is 4.20x versus 0.88x for Urban Outfitters. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vision Marine Technologies has a net margin of 14.68% compared to Lululemon Athletica's net margin of -1119.66%. Lululemon Athletica's return on equity of 43.4% beat Vision Marine Technologies's return on equity of -231.49%.

Lululemon Athletica has a consensus price target of $395.40, signalling upside risk potential of 15.77%. On the other hand Vision Marine Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $234.56 which suggests that it could grow by 43575.47%. Given that Vision Marine Technologies has higher upside potential than Lululemon Athletica, analysts believe Vision Marine Technologies is more attractive than Lululemon Athletica.

Lululemon Athletica has a beta of 1.209, which suggesting that the stock is 20.916% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vision Marine Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Lululemon Athletica has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Vision Marine Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lululemon Athletica pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Vision Marine Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lululemon Athletica quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are larger than Vision Marine Technologies quarterly revenues of $103.5K. Lululemon Athletica's net income of $351.9M is higher than Vision Marine Technologies's net income of -$1.2M. Notably, Lululemon Athletica's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.68x while Vision Marine Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lululemon Athletica is 4.20x versus 0.08x for Vision Marine Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.