GAME Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Electronic Arts has a net margin of -20.76% compared to GameSquare Holdings's net margin of 14.52%. GameSquare Holdings's return on equity of -115.34% beat Electronic Arts's return on equity of 13.97%.

GameSquare Holdings has a consensus price target of $3.33, signalling upside risk potential of 282.7%. On the other hand Electronic Arts has an analysts' consensus of $162.13 which suggests that it could grow by 10.83%. Given that GameSquare Holdings has higher upside potential than Electronic Arts, analysts believe GameSquare Holdings is more attractive than Electronic Arts.

GameSquare Holdings has a beta of 1.172, which suggesting that the stock is 17.152% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Electronic Arts has a beta of 0.805, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.512%.

GameSquare Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Electronic Arts offers a yield of 0.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. GameSquare Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Electronic Arts pays out 16.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Electronic Arts's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

GameSquare Holdings quarterly revenues are $26.4M, which are smaller than Electronic Arts quarterly revenues of $2B. GameSquare Holdings's net income of -$5.5M is lower than Electronic Arts's net income of $294M. Notably, GameSquare Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Electronic Arts's PE ratio is 37.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GameSquare Holdings is 0.20x versus 5.32x for Electronic Arts. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

GD Culture Group has a net margin of -20.76% compared to GameSquare Holdings's net margin of --. GameSquare Holdings's return on equity of -115.34% beat GD Culture Group's return on equity of --.

GameSquare Holdings has a consensus price target of $3.33, signalling upside risk potential of 282.7%. On the other hand GD Culture Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that GameSquare Holdings has higher upside potential than GD Culture Group, analysts believe GameSquare Holdings is more attractive than GD Culture Group.

GameSquare Holdings has a beta of 1.172, which suggesting that the stock is 17.152% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GD Culture Group has a beta of 1.617, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.677%.

GameSquare Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. GD Culture Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. GameSquare Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. GD Culture Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

GameSquare Holdings quarterly revenues are $26.4M, which are larger than GD Culture Group quarterly revenues of --. GameSquare Holdings's net income of -$5.5M is lower than GD Culture Group's net income of -$3.7M. Notably, GameSquare Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while GD Culture Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GameSquare Holdings is 0.20x versus -- for GD Culture Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Golden Matrix Group has a net margin of -20.76% compared to GameSquare Holdings's net margin of -8.31%. GameSquare Holdings's return on equity of -115.34% beat Golden Matrix Group's return on equity of -4.41%.

GameSquare Holdings has a consensus price target of $3.33, signalling upside risk potential of 282.7%. On the other hand Golden Matrix Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 97.04%. Given that GameSquare Holdings has higher upside potential than Golden Matrix Group, analysts believe GameSquare Holdings is more attractive than Golden Matrix Group.

GameSquare Holdings has a beta of 1.172, which suggesting that the stock is 17.152% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Golden Matrix Group has a beta of 1.942, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 94.197%.

GameSquare Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Golden Matrix Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. GameSquare Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Golden Matrix Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

GameSquare Holdings quarterly revenues are $26.4M, which are smaller than Golden Matrix Group quarterly revenues of $41M. GameSquare Holdings's net income of -$5.5M is lower than Golden Matrix Group's net income of -$3.4M. Notably, GameSquare Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Golden Matrix Group's PE ratio is 836.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GameSquare Holdings is 0.20x versus 1.59x for Golden Matrix Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Take-Two Interactive Software has a net margin of -20.76% compared to GameSquare Holdings's net margin of -27.01%. GameSquare Holdings's return on equity of -115.34% beat Take-Two Interactive Software's return on equity of -52.65%.

GameSquare Holdings has a consensus price target of $3.33, signalling upside risk potential of 282.7%. On the other hand Take-Two Interactive Software has an analysts' consensus of $196.07 which suggests that it could grow by 3.88%. Given that GameSquare Holdings has higher upside potential than Take-Two Interactive Software, analysts believe GameSquare Holdings is more attractive than Take-Two Interactive Software.

GameSquare Holdings has a beta of 1.172, which suggesting that the stock is 17.152% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Take-Two Interactive Software has a beta of 0.888, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.25%.

GameSquare Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Take-Two Interactive Software offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. GameSquare Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Take-Two Interactive Software pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

GameSquare Holdings quarterly revenues are $26.4M, which are smaller than Take-Two Interactive Software quarterly revenues of $1.4B. GameSquare Holdings's net income of -$5.5M is higher than Take-Two Interactive Software's net income of -$365.5M. Notably, GameSquare Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Take-Two Interactive Software's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GameSquare Holdings is 0.20x versus 5.96x for Take-Two Interactive Software. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.