FRD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Calumet has a net margin of -1.23% compared to Friedman Industries's net margin of -4.29%. Friedman Industries's return on equity of 4.48% beat Calumet's return on equity of --.

Friedman Industries has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Calumet has an analysts' consensus of $19.60 which suggests that it could grow by 108.18%. Given that Calumet has higher upside potential than Friedman Industries, analysts believe Calumet is more attractive than Friedman Industries.

Friedman Industries has a beta of 1.390, which suggesting that the stock is 39.042% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Calumet has a beta of 1.421, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.061%.

Friedman Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.95%. Calumet offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Friedman Industries pays 3.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Calumet pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Friedman Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Friedman Industries quarterly revenues are $94.1M, which are smaller than Calumet quarterly revenues of $949.5M. Friedman Industries's net income of -$1.2M is higher than Calumet's net income of -$40.7M. Notably, Friedman Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.73x while Calumet's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Friedman Industries is 0.26x versus 0.19x for Calumet. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Core Molding Technologies has a net margin of -1.23% compared to Friedman Industries's net margin of -0.06%. Friedman Industries's return on equity of 4.48% beat Core Molding Technologies's return on equity of 9.18%.

Friedman Industries has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Core Molding Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $22.00 which suggests that it could grow by 45.99%. Given that Core Molding Technologies has higher upside potential than Friedman Industries, analysts believe Core Molding Technologies is more attractive than Friedman Industries.

Friedman Industries has a beta of 1.390, which suggesting that the stock is 39.042% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Core Molding Technologies has a beta of 1.417, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.701%.

Friedman Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.95%. Core Molding Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Friedman Industries pays 3.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Core Molding Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Friedman Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Friedman Industries quarterly revenues are $94.1M, which are larger than Core Molding Technologies quarterly revenues of $62.5M. Friedman Industries's net income of -$1.2M is lower than Core Molding Technologies's net income of -$39K. Notably, Friedman Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.73x while Core Molding Technologies's PE ratio is 9.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Friedman Industries is 0.26x versus 0.44x for Core Molding Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Green Plains has a net margin of -1.23% compared to Friedman Industries's net margin of -9.41%. Friedman Industries's return on equity of 4.48% beat Green Plains's return on equity of -9%.

Friedman Industries has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Green Plains has an analysts' consensus of $10.17 which suggests that it could grow by 192.15%. Given that Green Plains has higher upside potential than Friedman Industries, analysts believe Green Plains is more attractive than Friedman Industries.

Friedman Industries has a beta of 1.390, which suggesting that the stock is 39.042% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Green Plains has a beta of 1.205, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.453%.

Friedman Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.95%. Green Plains offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Friedman Industries pays 3.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Green Plains pays out -6.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Friedman Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Friedman Industries quarterly revenues are $94.1M, which are smaller than Green Plains quarterly revenues of $584M. Friedman Industries's net income of -$1.2M is higher than Green Plains's net income of -$54.9M. Notably, Friedman Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.73x while Green Plains's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Friedman Industries is 0.26x versus 0.09x for Green Plains. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hudson Technologies has a net margin of -1.23% compared to Friedman Industries's net margin of -7.4%. Friedman Industries's return on equity of 4.48% beat Hudson Technologies's return on equity of 10.03%.

Friedman Industries has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Hudson Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $6.56 which suggests that it could grow by 21.75%. Given that Hudson Technologies has higher upside potential than Friedman Industries, analysts believe Hudson Technologies is more attractive than Friedman Industries.

Friedman Industries has a beta of 1.390, which suggesting that the stock is 39.042% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hudson Technologies has a beta of 1.026, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.602%.

Friedman Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.95%. Hudson Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Friedman Industries pays 3.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Hudson Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Friedman Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Friedman Industries quarterly revenues are $94.1M, which are larger than Hudson Technologies quarterly revenues of $34.6M. Friedman Industries's net income of -$1.2M is higher than Hudson Technologies's net income of -$2.6M. Notably, Friedman Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.73x while Hudson Technologies's PE ratio is 10.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Friedman Industries is 0.26x versus 1.07x for Hudson Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.