HDSN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Friedman Industries has a net margin of -7.4% compared to Hudson Technologies's net margin of -1.23%. Hudson Technologies's return on equity of 10.03% beat Friedman Industries's return on equity of 4.48%.

Hudson Technologies has a consensus price target of $6.56, signalling upside risk potential of 5.17%. On the other hand Friedman Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Hudson Technologies has higher upside potential than Friedman Industries, analysts believe Hudson Technologies is more attractive than Friedman Industries.

Hudson Technologies has a beta of 1.124, which suggesting that the stock is 12.405% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Friedman Industries has a beta of 1.417, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.675%.

Hudson Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Friedman Industries offers a yield of 1.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Hudson Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Friedman Industries pays out 3.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Friedman Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hudson Technologies quarterly revenues are $34.6M, which are smaller than Friedman Industries quarterly revenues of $94.1M. Hudson Technologies's net income of -$2.6M is lower than Friedman Industries's net income of -$1.2M. Notably, Hudson Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.24x while Friedman Industries's PE ratio is 19.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hudson Technologies is 1.24x versus 0.24x for Friedman Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Linde PLC has a net margin of -7.4% compared to Hudson Technologies's net margin of 20.83%. Hudson Technologies's return on equity of 10.03% beat Linde PLC's return on equity of 16.33%.

Hudson Technologies has a consensus price target of $6.56, signalling upside risk potential of 5.17%. On the other hand Linde PLC has an analysts' consensus of $496.05 which suggests that it could grow by 8.44%. Given that Linde PLC has higher upside potential than Hudson Technologies, analysts believe Linde PLC is more attractive than Hudson Technologies.

Hudson Technologies has a beta of 1.124, which suggesting that the stock is 12.405% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Linde PLC has a beta of 0.943, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.702%.

Hudson Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Linde PLC offers a yield of 1.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share. Hudson Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Linde PLC pays out 40.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Linde PLC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hudson Technologies quarterly revenues are $34.6M, which are smaller than Linde PLC quarterly revenues of $8.3B. Hudson Technologies's net income of -$2.6M is lower than Linde PLC's net income of $1.7B. Notably, Hudson Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.24x while Linde PLC's PE ratio is 33.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hudson Technologies is 1.24x versus 6.68x for Linde PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Gold Nevada has a net margin of -7.4% compared to Hudson Technologies's net margin of --. Hudson Technologies's return on equity of 10.03% beat Paramount Gold Nevada's return on equity of --.

Hudson Technologies has a consensus price target of $6.56, signalling upside risk potential of 5.17%. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada has an analysts' consensus of $1.40 which suggests that it could grow by 273.23%. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada has higher upside potential than Hudson Technologies, analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada is more attractive than Hudson Technologies.

Hudson Technologies has a beta of 1.124, which suggesting that the stock is 12.405% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada has a beta of 1.923, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 92.323%.

Hudson Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Paramount Gold Nevada offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hudson Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Hudson Technologies quarterly revenues are $34.6M, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada quarterly revenues of --. Hudson Technologies's net income of -$2.6M is lower than Paramount Gold Nevada's net income of -$2M. Notably, Hudson Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.24x while Paramount Gold Nevada's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hudson Technologies is 1.24x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solitario Resources has a net margin of -7.4% compared to Hudson Technologies's net margin of --. Hudson Technologies's return on equity of 10.03% beat Solitario Resources's return on equity of --.

Hudson Technologies has a consensus price target of $6.56, signalling upside risk potential of 5.17%. On the other hand Solitario Resources has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 136.52%. Given that Solitario Resources has higher upside potential than Hudson Technologies, analysts believe Solitario Resources is more attractive than Hudson Technologies.

Hudson Technologies has a beta of 1.124, which suggesting that the stock is 12.405% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solitario Resources has a beta of 0.921, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.928%.

Hudson Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Solitario Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hudson Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Solitario Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Hudson Technologies quarterly revenues are $34.6M, which are larger than Solitario Resources quarterly revenues of --. Hudson Technologies's net income of -$2.6M is lower than Solitario Resources's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, Hudson Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.24x while Solitario Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hudson Technologies is 1.24x versus -- for Solitario Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.