Will Uber Stock Recover?
Shares of Uber Technologies (NYSE:UBER) have had a rough few…
Buy
56
FOSL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$1.89
Seasonality move
:
5.43%
Day range:
$1.77 - $2.03
52-week range:
$0.75 - $2.61
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
0.09x
P/B ratio:
0.65x
Volume:
791.2K
Avg. volume:
1.7M
1-year change:
34.56%
Market cap:
$106.7M
Revenue:
$1.4B
EPS (TTM):
-$2.32
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FOSL
Fossil Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
AMWD
American Woodmark
|
$458.3M | $2.37 | -3.04% | 1.26% | $109.50 |
|
BSET
Bassett Furniture Industries
|
$82.9M | -$0.02 | -11.94% | -97.87% | -- |
|
CLAR
Clarus
|
$68.7M | $0.09 | -10.15% | -50% | -- |
|
HYLN
Hyliion Holdings
|
$500M | -- | -100% | -- | -- |
|
NCL
Northann
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FOSL
Fossil Group
|
$2.01 | -- | $106.7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.09x |
|
AMWD
American Woodmark
|
$77.03 | $109.50 | $1.2B | 11.51x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.68x |
|
BSET
Bassett Furniture Industries
|
$13.96 | -- | $122.9M | -- | $0.20 | 5.44% | 0.36x |
|
CLAR
Clarus
|
$4.46 | -- | $171.1M | 34.31x | $0.03 | 2.24% | 0.63x |
|
HYLN
Hyliion Holdings
|
$2.39 | -- | $415.2M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 239.69x |
|
NCL
Northann
|
$0.28 | -- | $6.5M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.51x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FOSL
Fossil Group
|
51.67% | 2.806 | 294.2% | 0.88x |
|
AMWD
American Woodmark
|
29.11% | 0.898 | 27.33% | 0.92x |
|
BSET
Bassett Furniture Industries
|
-- | 1.234 | -- | 0.98x |
|
CLAR
Clarus
|
-- | 1.243 | -- | 2.55x |
|
HYLN
Hyliion Holdings
|
-- | 7.511 | -- | -- |
|
NCL
Northann
|
-- | 0.091 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FOSL
Fossil Group
|
$142.2M | -$18.6M | -29.26% | -55.76% | -7.24% | -$24.1M |
|
AMWD
American Woodmark
|
$85.7M | $43.7M | 8.23% | 11.62% | 8.38% | $1.1M |
|
BSET
Bassett Furniture Industries
|
$40.1M | -$5.1M | -9.56% | -9.56% | -6.77% | -$1.4M |
|
CLAR
Clarus
|
$23.5M | -$4.8M | 1.38% | 1.61% | -7.12% | -$9.4M |
|
HYLN
Hyliion Holdings
|
-- | -$15.1M | -- | -- | -- | -$12.4M |
|
NCL
Northann
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Fossil Group vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns FOSL or AMWD?
American Woodmark has a net margin of -11.13% compared to Fossil Group's net margin of 6.12%. Fossil Group's return on equity of -55.76% beat American Woodmark's return on equity of 11.62%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FOSLFossil Group49.42% -$0.60 $337.6M AMWDAmerican Woodmark18.94% $1.79 $1.3B -
What do Analysts Say About FOSL or AMWD?
Fossil Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 24.69%. On the other hand American Woodmark has an analysts' consensus of $109.50 which suggests that it could grow by 42.15%. Given that American Woodmark has higher upside potential than Fossil Group, analysts believe American Woodmark is more attractive than Fossil Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FOSLFossil Group0 0 0 AMWDAmerican Woodmark3 0 0 -
Is FOSL or AMWD More Risky?
Fossil Group has a beta of 2.199, which suggesting that the stock is 119.888% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison American Woodmark has a beta of 1.606, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.563%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FOSL or AMWD?
Fossil Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. American Woodmark offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fossil Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. American Woodmark pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FOSL or AMWD?
Fossil Group quarterly revenues are $287.8M, which are smaller than American Woodmark quarterly revenues of $452.5M. Fossil Group's net income of -$32M is lower than American Woodmark's net income of $27.7M. Notably, Fossil Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while American Woodmark's PE ratio is 11.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fossil Group is 0.09x versus 0.68x for American Woodmark. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FOSLFossil Group0.09x -- $287.8M -$32M AMWDAmerican Woodmark0.68x 11.51x $452.5M $27.7M
-
Which has Higher Returns FOSL or BSET?
Bassett Furniture Industries has a net margin of -11.13% compared to Fossil Group's net margin of -5.96%. Fossil Group's return on equity of -55.76% beat Bassett Furniture Industries's return on equity of -9.56%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FOSLFossil Group49.42% -$0.60 $337.6M BSETBassett Furniture Industries53.02% -$0.52 $165M -
What do Analysts Say About FOSL or BSET?
Fossil Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 24.69%. On the other hand Bassett Furniture Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 36.1%. Given that Bassett Furniture Industries has higher upside potential than Fossil Group, analysts believe Bassett Furniture Industries is more attractive than Fossil Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FOSLFossil Group0 0 0 BSETBassett Furniture Industries0 0 0 -
Is FOSL or BSET More Risky?
Fossil Group has a beta of 2.199, which suggesting that the stock is 119.888% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bassett Furniture Industries has a beta of 1.692, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.196%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FOSL or BSET?
Fossil Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bassett Furniture Industries offers a yield of 5.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Fossil Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bassett Furniture Industries pays out -188.65% of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FOSL or BSET?
Fossil Group quarterly revenues are $287.8M, which are larger than Bassett Furniture Industries quarterly revenues of $75.6M. Fossil Group's net income of -$32M is lower than Bassett Furniture Industries's net income of -$4.5M. Notably, Fossil Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Bassett Furniture Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fossil Group is 0.09x versus 0.36x for Bassett Furniture Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FOSLFossil Group0.09x -- $287.8M -$32M BSETBassett Furniture Industries0.36x -- $75.6M -$4.5M
-
Which has Higher Returns FOSL or CLAR?
Clarus has a net margin of -11.13% compared to Fossil Group's net margin of -4.7%. Fossil Group's return on equity of -55.76% beat Clarus's return on equity of 1.61%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FOSLFossil Group49.42% -$0.60 $337.6M CLARClarus35.01% -$0.08 $308.5M -
What do Analysts Say About FOSL or CLAR?
Fossil Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 24.69%. On the other hand Clarus has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 22.38%. Given that Fossil Group has higher upside potential than Clarus, analysts believe Fossil Group is more attractive than Clarus.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FOSLFossil Group0 0 0 CLARClarus0 0 0 -
Is FOSL or CLAR More Risky?
Fossil Group has a beta of 2.199, which suggesting that the stock is 119.888% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Clarus has a beta of 0.836, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.424%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FOSL or CLAR?
Fossil Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Clarus offers a yield of 2.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Fossil Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Clarus pays out -36.96% of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FOSL or CLAR?
Fossil Group quarterly revenues are $287.8M, which are larger than Clarus quarterly revenues of $67.1M. Fossil Group's net income of -$32M is lower than Clarus's net income of -$3.2M. Notably, Fossil Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Clarus's PE ratio is 34.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fossil Group is 0.09x versus 0.63x for Clarus. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FOSLFossil Group0.09x -- $287.8M -$32M CLARClarus0.63x 34.31x $67.1M -$3.2M
-
Which has Higher Returns FOSL or HYLN?
Hyliion Holdings has a net margin of -11.13% compared to Fossil Group's net margin of --. Fossil Group's return on equity of -55.76% beat Hyliion Holdings's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FOSLFossil Group49.42% -$0.60 $337.6M HYLNHyliion Holdings-- -$0.06 -- -
What do Analysts Say About FOSL or HYLN?
Fossil Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 24.69%. On the other hand Hyliion Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -16.32%. Given that Fossil Group has higher upside potential than Hyliion Holdings, analysts believe Fossil Group is more attractive than Hyliion Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FOSLFossil Group0 0 0 HYLNHyliion Holdings0 1 0 -
Is FOSL or HYLN More Risky?
Fossil Group has a beta of 2.199, which suggesting that the stock is 119.888% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyliion Holdings has a beta of 2.097, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 109.703%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FOSL or HYLN?
Fossil Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hyliion Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fossil Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hyliion Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FOSL or HYLN?
Fossil Group quarterly revenues are $287.8M, which are larger than Hyliion Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Fossil Group's net income of -$32M is lower than Hyliion Holdings's net income of -$11.2M. Notably, Fossil Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hyliion Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fossil Group is 0.09x versus 239.69x for Hyliion Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FOSLFossil Group0.09x -- $287.8M -$32M HYLNHyliion Holdings239.69x -- -- -$11.2M
-
Which has Higher Returns FOSL or NCL?
Northann has a net margin of -11.13% compared to Fossil Group's net margin of --. Fossil Group's return on equity of -55.76% beat Northann's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FOSLFossil Group49.42% -$0.60 $337.6M NCLNorthann-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FOSL or NCL?
Fossil Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 24.69%. On the other hand Northann has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fossil Group has higher upside potential than Northann, analysts believe Fossil Group is more attractive than Northann.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FOSLFossil Group0 0 0 NCLNorthann0 0 0 -
Is FOSL or NCL More Risky?
Fossil Group has a beta of 2.199, which suggesting that the stock is 119.888% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Northann has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FOSL or NCL?
Fossil Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Northann offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fossil Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Northann pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FOSL or NCL?
Fossil Group quarterly revenues are $287.8M, which are larger than Northann quarterly revenues of --. Fossil Group's net income of -$32M is higher than Northann's net income of --. Notably, Fossil Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Northann's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fossil Group is 0.09x versus 0.51x for Northann. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FOSLFossil Group0.09x -- $287.8M -$32M NCLNorthann0.51x -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is ARK Next Generation Internet ETF a Good Investment?
The ARK Next Generation Internet ETF looks like a pretty…
Why Is Marvell Stock Up?
Semiconductor and data infrastructure company Marvell Technology (NASDAQ:MRVL) absolutely trounced…
Stock Ideas
Sell
40
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Buy
51
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 117x
Sell
44
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Alerts
Sell
1
IONQ alert for Jan 10
IonQ [IONQ] is up 7.07% over the past day.
Sell
47
CEG alert for Jan 10
Constellation Energy [CEG] is up 25.15% over the past day.
Sell
8
CRNX alert for Jan 10
Crinetics Pharmaceuticals [CRNX] is down 16.31% over the past day.
