EEFT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Automatic Data Processing has a net margin of 4.32% compared to Euronet Worldwide's net margin of 20.17%. Euronet Worldwide's return on equity of 24.29% beat Automatic Data Processing's return on equity of 82.22%.

Euronet Worldwide has a consensus price target of $129.00, signalling upside risk potential of 20.41%. On the other hand Automatic Data Processing has an analysts' consensus of $309.41 which suggests that it could grow by 2.85%. Given that Euronet Worldwide has higher upside potential than Automatic Data Processing, analysts believe Euronet Worldwide is more attractive than Automatic Data Processing.

Euronet Worldwide has a beta of 1.373, which suggesting that the stock is 37.299% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Automatic Data Processing has a beta of 0.765, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.473%.

Euronet Worldwide has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Automatic Data Processing offers a yield of 1.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.54 per share. Euronet Worldwide pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Automatic Data Processing pays out 58.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Automatic Data Processing's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Euronet Worldwide quarterly revenues are $1B, which are smaller than Automatic Data Processing quarterly revenues of $4.8B. Euronet Worldwide's net income of $45.2M is lower than Automatic Data Processing's net income of $963.2M. Notably, Euronet Worldwide's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.56x while Automatic Data Processing's PE ratio is 31.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Euronet Worldwide is 1.29x versus 6.57x for Automatic Data Processing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Autodesk has a net margin of 4.32% compared to Euronet Worldwide's net margin of 18.49%. Euronet Worldwide's return on equity of 24.29% beat Autodesk's return on equity of 47.41%.

Euronet Worldwide has a consensus price target of $129.00, signalling upside risk potential of 20.41%. On the other hand Autodesk has an analysts' consensus of $335.29 which suggests that it could grow by 28.15%. Given that Autodesk has higher upside potential than Euronet Worldwide, analysts believe Autodesk is more attractive than Euronet Worldwide.

Euronet Worldwide has a beta of 1.373, which suggesting that the stock is 37.299% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Autodesk has a beta of 1.506, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.556%.

Euronet Worldwide has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Autodesk offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Euronet Worldwide pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Autodesk pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Euronet Worldwide quarterly revenues are $1B, which are smaller than Autodesk quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Euronet Worldwide's net income of $45.2M is lower than Autodesk's net income of $303M. Notably, Euronet Worldwide's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.56x while Autodesk's PE ratio is 51.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Euronet Worldwide is 1.29x versus 9.26x for Autodesk. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Datadog has a net margin of 4.32% compared to Euronet Worldwide's net margin of 6.18%. Euronet Worldwide's return on equity of 24.29% beat Datadog's return on equity of 7.67%.

Euronet Worldwide has a consensus price target of $129.00, signalling upside risk potential of 20.41%. On the other hand Datadog has an analysts' consensus of $159.48 which suggests that it could grow by 57.75%. Given that Datadog has higher upside potential than Euronet Worldwide, analysts believe Datadog is more attractive than Euronet Worldwide.

Euronet Worldwide has a beta of 1.373, which suggesting that the stock is 37.299% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Datadog has a beta of 1.221, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.053%.

Euronet Worldwide has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Datadog offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Euronet Worldwide pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Datadog pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Euronet Worldwide quarterly revenues are $1B, which are larger than Datadog quarterly revenues of $737.7M. Euronet Worldwide's net income of $45.2M is lower than Datadog's net income of $45.6M. Notably, Euronet Worldwide's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.56x while Datadog's PE ratio is 198.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Euronet Worldwide is 1.29x versus 13.49x for Datadog. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Inuvo has a net margin of 4.32% compared to Euronet Worldwide's net margin of 0.54%. Euronet Worldwide's return on equity of 24.29% beat Inuvo's return on equity of -40.29%.

Euronet Worldwide has a consensus price target of $129.00, signalling upside risk potential of 20.41%. On the other hand Inuvo has an analysts' consensus of $1.40 which suggests that it could grow by 269.88%. Given that Inuvo has higher upside potential than Euronet Worldwide, analysts believe Inuvo is more attractive than Euronet Worldwide.

Euronet Worldwide has a beta of 1.373, which suggesting that the stock is 37.299% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inuvo has a beta of 0.859, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.144%.

Euronet Worldwide has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Inuvo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Euronet Worldwide pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Inuvo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Euronet Worldwide quarterly revenues are $1B, which are larger than Inuvo quarterly revenues of $26.2M. Euronet Worldwide's net income of $45.2M is higher than Inuvo's net income of $141.3K. Notably, Euronet Worldwide's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.56x while Inuvo's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Euronet Worldwide is 1.29x versus 0.63x for Inuvo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.