COCO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Monster Beverage has a net margin of 2.65% compared to The Vita Coco's net margin of 14.94%. The Vita Coco's return on equity of 24.22% beat Monster Beverage's return on equity of 21.93%.

The Vita Coco has a consensus price target of $37.44, signalling upside risk potential of 24.11%. On the other hand Monster Beverage has an analysts' consensus of $56.6754 which suggests that it could fall by -4.52%. Given that The Vita Coco has higher upside potential than Monster Beverage, analysts believe The Vita Coco is more attractive than Monster Beverage.

The Vita Coco has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Monster Beverage has a beta of 0.644, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.624%.

The Vita Coco has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Monster Beverage offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. The Vita Coco pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Monster Beverage pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

The Vita Coco quarterly revenues are $127.3M, which are smaller than Monster Beverage quarterly revenues of $1.8B. The Vita Coco's net income of $3.4M is lower than Monster Beverage's net income of $270.7M. Notably, The Vita Coco's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.10x while Monster Beverage's PE ratio is 37.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Vita Coco is 3.47x versus 8.03x for Monster Beverage. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PepsiCo has a net margin of 2.65% compared to The Vita Coco's net margin of 5.48%. The Vita Coco's return on equity of 24.22% beat PepsiCo's return on equity of 50.31%.

The Vita Coco has a consensus price target of $37.44, signalling upside risk potential of 24.11%. On the other hand PepsiCo has an analysts' consensus of $162.96 which suggests that it could grow by 9.28%. Given that The Vita Coco has higher upside potential than PepsiCo, analysts believe The Vita Coco is more attractive than PepsiCo.

The Vita Coco has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PepsiCo has a beta of 0.492, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.787%.

The Vita Coco has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PepsiCo offers a yield of 3.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.36 per share. The Vita Coco pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PepsiCo pays out 75.48% of its earnings as a dividend. PepsiCo's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The Vita Coco quarterly revenues are $127.3M, which are smaller than PepsiCo quarterly revenues of $27.8B. The Vita Coco's net income of $3.4M is lower than PepsiCo's net income of $1.5B. Notably, The Vita Coco's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.10x while PepsiCo's PE ratio is 21.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Vita Coco is 3.47x versus 2.24x for PepsiCo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Boston Beer has a net margin of 2.65% compared to The Vita Coco's net margin of -9.63%. The Vita Coco's return on equity of 24.22% beat Boston Beer's return on equity of 5.86%.

The Vita Coco has a consensus price target of $37.44, signalling upside risk potential of 24.11%. On the other hand Boston Beer has an analysts' consensus of $263.81 which suggests that it could grow by 7.08%. Given that The Vita Coco has higher upside potential than Boston Beer, analysts believe The Vita Coco is more attractive than Boston Beer.

The Vita Coco has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Boston Beer has a beta of 1.259, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.865%.

The Vita Coco has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Boston Beer offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. The Vita Coco pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Boston Beer pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

The Vita Coco quarterly revenues are $127.3M, which are smaller than Boston Beer quarterly revenues of $402.3M. The Vita Coco's net income of $3.4M is higher than Boston Beer's net income of -$38.8M. Notably, The Vita Coco's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.10x while Boston Beer's PE ratio is 50.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Vita Coco is 3.47x versus 1.44x for Boston Beer. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zevia PBC has a net margin of 2.65% compared to The Vita Coco's net margin of -14.61%. The Vita Coco's return on equity of 24.22% beat Zevia PBC's return on equity of -38.47%.

The Vita Coco has a consensus price target of $37.44, signalling upside risk potential of 24.11%. On the other hand Zevia PBC has an analysts' consensus of $4.17 which suggests that it could grow by 74.34%. Given that Zevia PBC has higher upside potential than The Vita Coco, analysts believe Zevia PBC is more attractive than The Vita Coco.

The Vita Coco has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zevia PBC has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

The Vita Coco has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zevia PBC offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. The Vita Coco pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zevia PBC pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

The Vita Coco quarterly revenues are $127.3M, which are larger than Zevia PBC quarterly revenues of $39.5M. The Vita Coco's net income of $3.4M is higher than Zevia PBC's net income of -$5.8M. Notably, The Vita Coco's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.10x while Zevia PBC's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Vita Coco is 3.47x versus 0.90x for Zevia PBC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.