COCO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Keurig Dr Pepper has a net margin of 14.49% compared to The Vita Coco's net margin of 15.83%. The Vita Coco's return on equity of 27.26% beat Keurig Dr Pepper's return on equity of 9.08%.

The Vita Coco has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -4.93%. On the other hand Keurig Dr Pepper has an analysts' consensus of $37.85 which suggests that it could grow by 16.96%. Given that Keurig Dr Pepper has higher upside potential than The Vita Coco, analysts believe Keurig Dr Pepper is more attractive than The Vita Coco.

The Vita Coco has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Keurig Dr Pepper has a beta of 0.609, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.118%.

The Vita Coco has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Keurig Dr Pepper offers a yield of 2.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. The Vita Coco pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Keurig Dr Pepper pays out 52.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Keurig Dr Pepper's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The Vita Coco quarterly revenues are $132.9M, which are smaller than Keurig Dr Pepper quarterly revenues of $3.9B. The Vita Coco's net income of $19.3M is lower than Keurig Dr Pepper's net income of $616M. Notably, The Vita Coco's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.24x while Keurig Dr Pepper's PE ratio is 19.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Vita Coco is 4.29x versus 2.94x for Keurig Dr Pepper. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Coca-Cola has a net margin of 14.49% compared to The Vita Coco's net margin of 24.03%. The Vita Coco's return on equity of 27.26% beat Coca-Cola's return on equity of 37.49%.

The Vita Coco has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -4.93%. On the other hand Coca-Cola has an analysts' consensus of $73.72 which suggests that it could grow by 17.85%. Given that Coca-Cola has higher upside potential than The Vita Coco, analysts believe Coca-Cola is more attractive than The Vita Coco.

The Vita Coco has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coca-Cola has a beta of 0.607, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.255%.

The Vita Coco has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Coca-Cola offers a yield of 3.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share. The Vita Coco pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Coca-Cola pays out 74.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Coca-Cola's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The Vita Coco quarterly revenues are $132.9M, which are smaller than Coca-Cola quarterly revenues of $11.9B. The Vita Coco's net income of $19.3M is lower than Coca-Cola's net income of $2.8B. Notably, The Vita Coco's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.24x while Coca-Cola's PE ratio is 25.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Vita Coco is 4.29x versus 5.83x for Coca-Cola. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PepsiCo has a net margin of 14.49% compared to The Vita Coco's net margin of 12.57%. The Vita Coco's return on equity of 27.26% beat PepsiCo's return on equity of 48.74%.

The Vita Coco has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -4.93%. On the other hand PepsiCo has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 18.55%. Given that PepsiCo has higher upside potential than The Vita Coco, analysts believe PepsiCo is more attractive than The Vita Coco.

The Vita Coco has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PepsiCo has a beta of 0.526, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.414%.

The Vita Coco has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PepsiCo offers a yield of 3.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.36 per share. The Vita Coco pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PepsiCo pays out 73.64% of its earnings as a dividend. PepsiCo's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The Vita Coco quarterly revenues are $132.9M, which are smaller than PepsiCo quarterly revenues of $23.3B. The Vita Coco's net income of $19.3M is lower than PepsiCo's net income of $2.9B. Notably, The Vita Coco's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.24x while PepsiCo's PE ratio is 22.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Vita Coco is 4.29x versus 2.29x for PepsiCo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zevia PBC has a net margin of 14.49% compared to The Vita Coco's net margin of -6.95%. The Vita Coco's return on equity of 27.26% beat Zevia PBC's return on equity of -37.54%.

The Vita Coco has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -4.93%. On the other hand Zevia PBC has an analysts' consensus of $3.02 which suggests that it could fall by -5.14%. Given that Zevia PBC has more downside risk than The Vita Coco, analysts believe The Vita Coco is more attractive than Zevia PBC.

The Vita Coco has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zevia PBC has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

The Vita Coco has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zevia PBC offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. The Vita Coco pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zevia PBC pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

The Vita Coco quarterly revenues are $132.9M, which are larger than Zevia PBC quarterly revenues of $36.4M. The Vita Coco's net income of $19.3M is higher than Zevia PBC's net income of -$2.5M. Notably, The Vita Coco's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.24x while Zevia PBC's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Vita Coco is 4.29x versus 1.17x for Zevia PBC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.