PEP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Keurig Dr Pepper has a net margin of 5.48% compared to PepsiCo's net margin of -3.54%. PepsiCo's return on equity of 50.31% beat Keurig Dr Pepper's return on equity of 5.8%.

PepsiCo has a consensus price target of $162.96, signalling upside risk potential of 8.68%. On the other hand Keurig Dr Pepper has an analysts' consensus of $37.86 which suggests that it could grow by 10.37%. Given that Keurig Dr Pepper has higher upside potential than PepsiCo, analysts believe Keurig Dr Pepper is more attractive than PepsiCo.

PepsiCo has a beta of 0.492, which suggesting that the stock is 50.787% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Keurig Dr Pepper has a beta of 0.542, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.794%.

PepsiCo has a quarterly dividend of $1.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.62%. Keurig Dr Pepper offers a yield of 2.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. PepsiCo pays 75.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Keurig Dr Pepper pays out 82.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PepsiCo quarterly revenues are $27.8B, which are larger than Keurig Dr Pepper quarterly revenues of $4.1B. PepsiCo's net income of $1.5B is higher than Keurig Dr Pepper's net income of -$144M. Notably, PepsiCo's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.57x while Keurig Dr Pepper's PE ratio is 32.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PepsiCo is 2.25x versus 3.05x for Keurig Dr Pepper. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Coca-Cola has a net margin of 5.48% compared to PepsiCo's net margin of 19.01%. PepsiCo's return on equity of 50.31% beat Coca-Cola's return on equity of 38.7%.

PepsiCo has a consensus price target of $162.96, signalling upside risk potential of 8.68%. On the other hand Coca-Cola has an analysts' consensus of $74.72 which suggests that it could grow by 4.32%. Given that PepsiCo has higher upside potential than Coca-Cola, analysts believe PepsiCo is more attractive than Coca-Cola.

PepsiCo has a beta of 0.492, which suggesting that the stock is 50.787% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coca-Cola has a beta of 0.453, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.72%.

PepsiCo has a quarterly dividend of $1.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.62%. Coca-Cola offers a yield of 2.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share. PepsiCo pays 75.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Coca-Cola pays out 78.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PepsiCo quarterly revenues are $27.8B, which are larger than Coca-Cola quarterly revenues of $11.5B. PepsiCo's net income of $1.5B is lower than Coca-Cola's net income of $2.2B. Notably, PepsiCo's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.57x while Coca-Cola's PE ratio is 29.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PepsiCo is 2.25x versus 6.57x for Coca-Cola. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Monster Beverage has a net margin of 5.48% compared to PepsiCo's net margin of 14.94%. PepsiCo's return on equity of 50.31% beat Monster Beverage's return on equity of 21.93%.

PepsiCo has a consensus price target of $162.96, signalling upside risk potential of 8.68%. On the other hand Monster Beverage has an analysts' consensus of $56.4671 which suggests that it could fall by -3.51%. Given that PepsiCo has higher upside potential than Monster Beverage, analysts believe PepsiCo is more attractive than Monster Beverage.

PepsiCo has a beta of 0.492, which suggesting that the stock is 50.787% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Monster Beverage has a beta of 0.644, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.624%.

PepsiCo has a quarterly dividend of $1.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.62%. Monster Beverage offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PepsiCo pays 75.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Monster Beverage pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. PepsiCo's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PepsiCo quarterly revenues are $27.8B, which are larger than Monster Beverage quarterly revenues of $1.8B. PepsiCo's net income of $1.5B is higher than Monster Beverage's net income of $270.7M. Notably, PepsiCo's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.57x while Monster Beverage's PE ratio is 36.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PepsiCo is 2.25x versus 7.91x for Monster Beverage. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Molson Coors Beverage has a net margin of 5.48% compared to PepsiCo's net margin of 10.52%. PepsiCo's return on equity of 50.31% beat Molson Coors Beverage's return on equity of 8.35%.

PepsiCo has a consensus price target of $162.96, signalling upside risk potential of 8.68%. On the other hand Molson Coors Beverage has an analysts' consensus of $65.84 which suggests that it could grow by 8.16%. Given that PepsiCo has higher upside potential than Molson Coors Beverage, analysts believe PepsiCo is more attractive than Molson Coors Beverage.

PepsiCo has a beta of 0.492, which suggesting that the stock is 50.787% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Molson Coors Beverage has a beta of 0.691, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.944%.

PepsiCo has a quarterly dividend of $1.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.62%. Molson Coors Beverage offers a yield of 2.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. PepsiCo pays 75.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Molson Coors Beverage pays out 32.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PepsiCo quarterly revenues are $27.8B, which are larger than Molson Coors Beverage quarterly revenues of $2.7B. PepsiCo's net income of $1.5B is higher than Molson Coors Beverage's net income of $287.8M. Notably, PepsiCo's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.57x while Molson Coors Beverage's PE ratio is 11.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PepsiCo is 2.25x versus 1.10x for Molson Coors Beverage. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.