CMCO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Astec Industries has a net margin of 1.69% compared to Columbus McKinnon's net margin of 5.88%. Columbus McKinnon's return on equity of 1.06% beat Astec Industries's return on equity of 0.67%.

Columbus McKinnon has a consensus price target of $32.75, signalling upside risk potential of 93.44%. On the other hand Astec Industries has an analysts' consensus of $43.00 which suggests that it could grow by 24.82%. Given that Columbus McKinnon has higher upside potential than Astec Industries, analysts believe Columbus McKinnon is more attractive than Astec Industries.

Columbus McKinnon has a beta of 1.264, which suggesting that the stock is 26.444% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Astec Industries has a beta of 1.395, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.516%.

Columbus McKinnon has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.65%. Astec Industries offers a yield of 1.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Columbus McKinnon pays 17.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Astec Industries pays out 276.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Columbus McKinnon's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Astec Industries's is not.

Columbus McKinnon quarterly revenues are $234.1M, which are smaller than Astec Industries quarterly revenues of $359M. Columbus McKinnon's net income of $4M is lower than Astec Industries's net income of $21.1M. Notably, Columbus McKinnon's price-to-earnings ratio is 51.30x while Astec Industries's PE ratio is 181.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Columbus McKinnon is 0.50x versus 0.60x for Astec Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Caterpillar has a net margin of 1.69% compared to Columbus McKinnon's net margin of 17.21%. Columbus McKinnon's return on equity of 1.06% beat Caterpillar's return on equity of 57.91%.

Columbus McKinnon has a consensus price target of $32.75, signalling upside risk potential of 93.44%. On the other hand Caterpillar has an analysts' consensus of $391.00 which suggests that it could grow by 18.56%. Given that Columbus McKinnon has higher upside potential than Caterpillar, analysts believe Columbus McKinnon is more attractive than Caterpillar.

Columbus McKinnon has a beta of 1.264, which suggesting that the stock is 26.444% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Caterpillar has a beta of 1.208, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.794%.

Columbus McKinnon has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.65%. Caterpillar offers a yield of 1.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.41 per share. Columbus McKinnon pays 17.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Caterpillar pays out 24.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Columbus McKinnon quarterly revenues are $234.1M, which are smaller than Caterpillar quarterly revenues of $16.2B. Columbus McKinnon's net income of $4M is lower than Caterpillar's net income of $2.8B. Notably, Columbus McKinnon's price-to-earnings ratio is 51.30x while Caterpillar's PE ratio is 14.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Columbus McKinnon is 0.50x versus 2.49x for Caterpillar. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

GE Aerospace has a net margin of 1.69% compared to Columbus McKinnon's net margin of 17.57%. Columbus McKinnon's return on equity of 1.06% beat GE Aerospace's return on equity of 27.96%.

Columbus McKinnon has a consensus price target of $32.75, signalling upside risk potential of 93.44%. On the other hand GE Aerospace has an analysts' consensus of $227.46 which suggests that it could grow by 13.65%. Given that Columbus McKinnon has higher upside potential than GE Aerospace, analysts believe Columbus McKinnon is more attractive than GE Aerospace.

Columbus McKinnon has a beta of 1.264, which suggesting that the stock is 26.444% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GE Aerospace has a beta of 1.047, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.7%.

Columbus McKinnon has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.65%. GE Aerospace offers a yield of 0.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. Columbus McKinnon pays 17.25% of its earnings as a dividend. GE Aerospace pays out 15.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Columbus McKinnon quarterly revenues are $234.1M, which are smaller than GE Aerospace quarterly revenues of $10.8B. Columbus McKinnon's net income of $4M is lower than GE Aerospace's net income of $1.9B. Notably, Columbus McKinnon's price-to-earnings ratio is 51.30x while GE Aerospace's PE ratio is 33.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Columbus McKinnon is 0.50x versus 4.79x for GE Aerospace. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gencor Industries has a net margin of 1.69% compared to Columbus McKinnon's net margin of 10.01%. Columbus McKinnon's return on equity of 1.06% beat Gencor Industries's return on equity of 8.69%.

Columbus McKinnon has a consensus price target of $32.75, signalling upside risk potential of 93.44%. On the other hand Gencor Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -24.62%. Given that Columbus McKinnon has higher upside potential than Gencor Industries, analysts believe Columbus McKinnon is more attractive than Gencor Industries.

Columbus McKinnon has a beta of 1.264, which suggesting that the stock is 26.444% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gencor Industries has a beta of 0.573, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.742%.

Columbus McKinnon has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.65%. Gencor Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Columbus McKinnon pays 17.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Gencor Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Columbus McKinnon's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Columbus McKinnon quarterly revenues are $234.1M, which are larger than Gencor Industries quarterly revenues of $25.6M. Columbus McKinnon's net income of $4M is higher than Gencor Industries's net income of $2.6M. Notably, Columbus McKinnon's price-to-earnings ratio is 51.30x while Gencor Industries's PE ratio is 16.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Columbus McKinnon is 0.50x versus 1.58x for Gencor Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.