CLNE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

ChampionX has a net margin of -17.33% compared to Clean Energy Fuels's net margin of 7.94%. Clean Energy Fuels's return on equity of -9.9% beat ChampionX's return on equity of 18.32%.

Clean Energy Fuels has a consensus price target of $7.08, signalling upside risk potential of 184.31%. On the other hand ChampionX has an analysts' consensus of $42.25 which suggests that it could grow by 58.72%. Given that Clean Energy Fuels has higher upside potential than ChampionX, analysts believe Clean Energy Fuels is more attractive than ChampionX.

Clean Energy Fuels has a beta of 2.143, which suggesting that the stock is 114.338% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ChampionX has a beta of 2.380, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 138.002%.

Clean Energy Fuels has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ChampionX offers a yield of 1.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Clean Energy Fuels pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ChampionX pays out 20.68% of its earnings as a dividend. ChampionX's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Clean Energy Fuels quarterly revenues are $104.9M, which are smaller than ChampionX quarterly revenues of $906.5M. Clean Energy Fuels's net income of -$18.2M is lower than ChampionX's net income of $72M. Notably, Clean Energy Fuels's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ChampionX's PE ratio is 16.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clean Energy Fuels is 1.38x versus 1.41x for ChampionX. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Drilling Tools International has a net margin of -17.33% compared to Clean Energy Fuels's net margin of 2.16%. Clean Energy Fuels's return on equity of -9.9% beat Drilling Tools International's return on equity of 8.5%.

Clean Energy Fuels has a consensus price target of $7.08, signalling upside risk potential of 184.31%. On the other hand Drilling Tools International has an analysts' consensus of $6.00 which suggests that it could grow by 88.09%. Given that Clean Energy Fuels has higher upside potential than Drilling Tools International, analysts believe Clean Energy Fuels is more attractive than Drilling Tools International.

Clean Energy Fuels has a beta of 2.143, which suggesting that the stock is 114.338% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Drilling Tools International has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Clean Energy Fuels has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Drilling Tools International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Clean Energy Fuels pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Drilling Tools International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Clean Energy Fuels quarterly revenues are $104.9M, which are larger than Drilling Tools International quarterly revenues of $40.1M. Clean Energy Fuels's net income of -$18.2M is lower than Drilling Tools International's net income of $867K. Notably, Clean Energy Fuels's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Drilling Tools International's PE ratio is 11.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clean Energy Fuels is 1.38x versus 0.66x for Drilling Tools International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Geospace Technologies has a net margin of -17.33% compared to Clean Energy Fuels's net margin of -36.29%. Clean Energy Fuels's return on equity of -9.9% beat Geospace Technologies's return on equity of -4.74%.

Clean Energy Fuels has a consensus price target of $7.08, signalling upside risk potential of 184.31%. On the other hand Geospace Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Clean Energy Fuels has higher upside potential than Geospace Technologies, analysts believe Clean Energy Fuels is more attractive than Geospace Technologies.

Clean Energy Fuels has a beta of 2.143, which suggesting that the stock is 114.338% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Geospace Technologies has a beta of 0.600, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.003%.

Clean Energy Fuels has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Geospace Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Clean Energy Fuels pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Geospace Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Clean Energy Fuels quarterly revenues are $104.9M, which are larger than Geospace Technologies quarterly revenues of $35.4M. Clean Energy Fuels's net income of -$18.2M is lower than Geospace Technologies's net income of -$12.9M. Notably, Clean Energy Fuels's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Geospace Technologies's PE ratio is 12.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clean Energy Fuels is 1.38x versus 0.99x for Geospace Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Icahn Enterprises LP has a net margin of -17.33% compared to Clean Energy Fuels's net margin of 0.91%. Clean Energy Fuels's return on equity of -9.9% beat Icahn Enterprises LP's return on equity of -8.52%.

Clean Energy Fuels has a consensus price target of $7.08, signalling upside risk potential of 184.31%. On the other hand Icahn Enterprises LP has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 62.51%. Given that Clean Energy Fuels has higher upside potential than Icahn Enterprises LP, analysts believe Clean Energy Fuels is more attractive than Icahn Enterprises LP.

Clean Energy Fuels has a beta of 2.143, which suggesting that the stock is 114.338% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Icahn Enterprises LP has a beta of 0.750, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.964%.

Clean Energy Fuels has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Icahn Enterprises LP offers a yield of 37.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Clean Energy Fuels pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Icahn Enterprises LP pays out -44.88% of its earnings as a dividend.

Clean Energy Fuels quarterly revenues are $104.9M, which are smaller than Icahn Enterprises LP quarterly revenues of $2.4B. Clean Energy Fuels's net income of -$18.2M is lower than Icahn Enterprises LP's net income of $22M. Notably, Clean Energy Fuels's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Icahn Enterprises LP's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clean Energy Fuels is 1.38x versus 0.40x for Icahn Enterprises LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.