GEOS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Drilling Tools International has a net margin of -36.29% compared to Geospace Technologies's net margin of 2.16%. Geospace Technologies's return on equity of -4.74% beat Drilling Tools International's return on equity of 8.5%.

Geospace Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Drilling Tools International has an analysts' consensus of $6.00 which suggests that it could grow by 88.09%. Given that Drilling Tools International has higher upside potential than Geospace Technologies, analysts believe Drilling Tools International is more attractive than Geospace Technologies.

Geospace Technologies has a beta of 0.600, which suggesting that the stock is 40.003% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Drilling Tools International has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Geospace Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Drilling Tools International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Geospace Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Drilling Tools International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Geospace Technologies quarterly revenues are $35.4M, which are smaller than Drilling Tools International quarterly revenues of $40.1M. Geospace Technologies's net income of -$12.9M is lower than Drilling Tools International's net income of $867K. Notably, Geospace Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.00x while Drilling Tools International's PE ratio is 11.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Geospace Technologies is 0.99x versus 0.66x for Drilling Tools International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MRC Global has a net margin of -36.29% compared to Geospace Technologies's net margin of 3.64%. Geospace Technologies's return on equity of -4.74% beat MRC Global's return on equity of 11.51%.

Geospace Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand MRC Global has an analysts' consensus of $15.75 which suggests that it could grow by 34.77%. Given that MRC Global has higher upside potential than Geospace Technologies, analysts believe MRC Global is more attractive than Geospace Technologies.

Geospace Technologies has a beta of 0.600, which suggesting that the stock is 40.003% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MRC Global has a beta of 1.966, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 96.641%.

Geospace Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MRC Global offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Geospace Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MRC Global pays out 21.05% of its earnings as a dividend. MRC Global's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Geospace Technologies quarterly revenues are $35.4M, which are smaller than MRC Global quarterly revenues of $797M. Geospace Technologies's net income of -$12.9M is lower than MRC Global's net income of $29M. Notably, Geospace Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.00x while MRC Global's PE ratio is 14.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Geospace Technologies is 0.99x versus 0.34x for MRC Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Natural Gas Services Group has a net margin of -36.29% compared to Geospace Technologies's net margin of 12.32%. Geospace Technologies's return on equity of -4.74% beat Natural Gas Services Group's return on equity of 6.65%.

Geospace Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Natural Gas Services Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 38.78%. Given that Natural Gas Services Group has higher upside potential than Geospace Technologies, analysts believe Natural Gas Services Group is more attractive than Geospace Technologies.

Geospace Technologies has a beta of 0.600, which suggesting that the stock is 40.003% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Natural Gas Services Group has a beta of 1.143, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.276%.

Geospace Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Natural Gas Services Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Geospace Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Natural Gas Services Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Geospace Technologies quarterly revenues are $35.4M, which are smaller than Natural Gas Services Group quarterly revenues of $40.7M. Geospace Technologies's net income of -$12.9M is lower than Natural Gas Services Group's net income of $5M. Notably, Geospace Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.00x while Natural Gas Services Group's PE ratio is 19.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Geospace Technologies is 0.99x versus 2.09x for Natural Gas Services Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NOV has a net margin of -36.29% compared to Geospace Technologies's net margin of 5.93%. Geospace Technologies's return on equity of -4.74% beat NOV's return on equity of 17.26%.

Geospace Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand NOV has an analysts' consensus of $19.67 which suggests that it could grow by 35.63%. Given that NOV has higher upside potential than Geospace Technologies, analysts believe NOV is more attractive than Geospace Technologies.

Geospace Technologies has a beta of 0.600, which suggesting that the stock is 40.003% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NOV has a beta of 1.658, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.785%.

Geospace Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NOV offers a yield of 1.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Geospace Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NOV pays out 7.96% of its earnings as a dividend. NOV's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Geospace Technologies quarterly revenues are $35.4M, which are smaller than NOV quarterly revenues of $2.2B. Geospace Technologies's net income of -$12.9M is lower than NOV's net income of $130M. Notably, Geospace Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.00x while NOV's PE ratio is 5.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Geospace Technologies is 0.99x versus 0.65x for NOV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.