ASML Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Applied Materials has a net margin of 27.81% compared to ASML Holding NV's net margin of 24.57%. ASML Holding NV's return on equity of 49.28% beat Applied Materials's return on equity of 39.95%.

ASML Holding NV has a consensus price target of $913.46, signalling upside risk potential of 26.92%. On the other hand Applied Materials has an analysts' consensus of $214.2188 which suggests that it could grow by 27.23%. Given that Applied Materials has higher upside potential than ASML Holding NV, analysts believe Applied Materials is more attractive than ASML Holding NV.

ASML Holding NV has a beta of 1.491, which suggesting that the stock is 49.147% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Applied Materials has a beta of 1.518, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.818%.

ASML Holding NV has a quarterly dividend of $1.64 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.94%. Applied Materials offers a yield of 0.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. ASML Holding NV pays 29.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Applied Materials pays out 16.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ASML Holding NV quarterly revenues are $8.2B, which are larger than Applied Materials quarterly revenues of $7B. ASML Holding NV's net income of $2.3B is higher than Applied Materials's net income of $1.7B. Notably, ASML Holding NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.68x while Applied Materials's PE ratio is 19.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ASML Holding NV is 9.95x versus 5.17x for Applied Materials. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Advanced Micro Devices has a net margin of 27.81% compared to ASML Holding NV's net margin of 11.31%. ASML Holding NV's return on equity of 49.28% beat Advanced Micro Devices's return on equity of 3.25%.

ASML Holding NV has a consensus price target of $913.46, signalling upside risk potential of 26.92%. On the other hand Advanced Micro Devices has an analysts' consensus of $183.16 which suggests that it could grow by 45.03%. Given that Advanced Micro Devices has higher upside potential than ASML Holding NV, analysts believe Advanced Micro Devices is more attractive than ASML Holding NV.

ASML Holding NV has a beta of 1.491, which suggesting that the stock is 49.147% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Advanced Micro Devices has a beta of 1.653, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.343%.

ASML Holding NV has a quarterly dividend of $1.64 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.94%. Advanced Micro Devices offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ASML Holding NV pays 29.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Advanced Micro Devices pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. ASML Holding NV's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ASML Holding NV quarterly revenues are $8.2B, which are larger than Advanced Micro Devices quarterly revenues of $6.8B. ASML Holding NV's net income of $2.3B is higher than Advanced Micro Devices's net income of $771M. Notably, ASML Holding NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.68x while Advanced Micro Devices's PE ratio is 113.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ASML Holding NV is 9.95x versus 8.50x for Advanced Micro Devices. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Intel has a net margin of 27.81% compared to ASML Holding NV's net margin of -125.26%. ASML Holding NV's return on equity of 49.28% beat Intel's return on equity of -14.47%.

ASML Holding NV has a consensus price target of $913.46, signalling upside risk potential of 26.92%. On the other hand Intel has an analysts' consensus of $24.33 which suggests that it could grow by 19.26%. Given that ASML Holding NV has higher upside potential than Intel, analysts believe ASML Holding NV is more attractive than Intel.

ASML Holding NV has a beta of 1.491, which suggesting that the stock is 49.147% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intel has a beta of 1.052, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.181%.

ASML Holding NV has a quarterly dividend of $1.64 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.94%. Intel offers a yield of 2.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. ASML Holding NV pays 29.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Intel pays out 182.83% of its earnings as a dividend. ASML Holding NV's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Intel's is not.

ASML Holding NV quarterly revenues are $8.2B, which are smaller than Intel quarterly revenues of $13.3B. ASML Holding NV's net income of $2.3B is higher than Intel's net income of -$16.6B. Notably, ASML Holding NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.68x while Intel's PE ratio is 91.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ASML Holding NV is 9.95x versus 1.61x for Intel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lam Research has a net margin of 27.81% compared to ASML Holding NV's net margin of 26.79%. ASML Holding NV's return on equity of 49.28% beat Lam Research's return on equity of 49.11%.

ASML Holding NV has a consensus price target of $913.46, signalling upside risk potential of 26.92%. On the other hand Lam Research has an analysts' consensus of $92.82 which suggests that it could grow by 25.72%. Given that ASML Holding NV has higher upside potential than Lam Research, analysts believe ASML Holding NV is more attractive than Lam Research.

ASML Holding NV has a beta of 1.491, which suggesting that the stock is 49.147% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lam Research has a beta of 1.463, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.279%.

ASML Holding NV has a quarterly dividend of $1.64 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.94%. Lam Research offers a yield of 1.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. ASML Holding NV pays 29.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Lam Research pays out 26.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ASML Holding NV quarterly revenues are $8.2B, which are larger than Lam Research quarterly revenues of $4.2B. ASML Holding NV's net income of $2.3B is higher than Lam Research's net income of $1.1B. Notably, ASML Holding NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.68x while Lam Research's PE ratio is 23.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ASML Holding NV is 9.95x versus 6.22x for Lam Research. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.