APPN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Jamf Holding has a net margin of -1.36% compared to Appian's net margin of -7.69%. Appian's return on equity of -2892.71% beat Jamf Holding's return on equity of -9.79%.

Appian has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 16.21%. On the other hand Jamf Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 55.71%. Given that Jamf Holding has higher upside potential than Appian, analysts believe Jamf Holding is more attractive than Appian.

Appian has a beta of 1.571, which suggesting that the stock is 57.109% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Jamf Holding has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Appian has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Jamf Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Appian pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Jamf Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Appian quarterly revenues are $154.1M, which are smaller than Jamf Holding quarterly revenues of $159.3M. Appian's net income of -$2.1M is higher than Jamf Holding's net income of -$12.2M. Notably, Appian's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Jamf Holding's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Appian is 4.31x versus 3.04x for Jamf Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Microsoft has a net margin of -1.36% compared to Appian's net margin of 37.61%. Appian's return on equity of -2892.71% beat Microsoft's return on equity of 35.68%.

Appian has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 16.21%. On the other hand Microsoft has an analysts' consensus of $507.50 which suggests that it could grow by 16.24%. Given that Microsoft has higher upside potential than Appian, analysts believe Microsoft is more attractive than Appian.

Appian has a beta of 1.571, which suggesting that the stock is 57.109% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microsoft has a beta of 0.899, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.139%.

Appian has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Microsoft offers a yield of 0.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Appian pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft pays out 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Appian quarterly revenues are $154.1M, which are smaller than Microsoft quarterly revenues of $65.6B. Appian's net income of -$2.1M is lower than Microsoft's net income of $24.7B. Notably, Appian's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Microsoft's PE ratio is 36.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Appian is 4.31x versus 12.83x for Microsoft. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paylocity Holding has a net margin of -1.36% compared to Appian's net margin of 10.87%. Appian's return on equity of -2892.71% beat Paylocity Holding's return on equity of 20.2%.

Appian has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 16.21%. On the other hand Paylocity Holding has an analysts' consensus of $213.64 which suggests that it could grow by 8.52%. Given that Appian has higher upside potential than Paylocity Holding, analysts believe Appian is more attractive than Paylocity Holding.

Appian has a beta of 1.571, which suggesting that the stock is 57.109% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paylocity Holding has a beta of 0.924, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.638%.

Appian has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Paylocity Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Appian pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Paylocity Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Appian quarterly revenues are $154.1M, which are smaller than Paylocity Holding quarterly revenues of $317.6M. Appian's net income of -$2.1M is lower than Paylocity Holding's net income of $34.5M. Notably, Appian's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Paylocity Holding's PE ratio is 54.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Appian is 4.31x versus 7.99x for Paylocity Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SPS Commerce has a net margin of -1.36% compared to Appian's net margin of 14.33%. Appian's return on equity of -2892.71% beat SPS Commerce's return on equity of 11.18%.

Appian has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 16.21%. On the other hand SPS Commerce has an analysts' consensus of $204.56 which suggests that it could grow by 18.33%. Given that SPS Commerce has higher upside potential than Appian, analysts believe SPS Commerce is more attractive than Appian.

Appian has a beta of 1.571, which suggesting that the stock is 57.109% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SPS Commerce has a beta of 0.865, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.527%.

Appian has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SPS Commerce offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Appian pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SPS Commerce pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Appian quarterly revenues are $154.1M, which are smaller than SPS Commerce quarterly revenues of $163.7M. Appian's net income of -$2.1M is lower than SPS Commerce's net income of $23.5M. Notably, Appian's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SPS Commerce's PE ratio is 90.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Appian is 4.31x versus 11.61x for SPS Commerce. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.