AOSL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Genpact has a net margin of -1.37% compared to Alpha & Omega Semiconductor's net margin of 10.97%. Alpha & Omega Semiconductor's return on equity of -2.17% beat Genpact's return on equity of 29.37%.

Alpha & Omega Semiconductor has a consensus price target of $38.00, signalling downside risk potential of -4.49%. On the other hand Genpact has an analysts' consensus of $37.82 which suggests that it could grow by 11.01%. Given that Genpact has higher upside potential than Alpha & Omega Semiconductor, analysts believe Genpact is more attractive than Alpha & Omega Semiconductor.

Alpha & Omega Semiconductor has a beta of 2.478, which suggesting that the stock is 147.752% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Genpact has a beta of 1.176, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.643%.

Alpha & Omega Semiconductor has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Genpact offers a yield of 1.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Alpha & Omega Semiconductor pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Genpact pays out 15.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Genpact's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Alpha & Omega Semiconductor quarterly revenues are $181.9M, which are smaller than Genpact quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Alpha & Omega Semiconductor's net income of -$2.5M is lower than Genpact's net income of $132.8M. Notably, Alpha & Omega Semiconductor's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Genpact's PE ratio is 11.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alpha & Omega Semiconductor is 1.73x versus 1.66x for Genpact. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Monolithic Power Systems has a net margin of -1.37% compared to Alpha & Omega Semiconductor's net margin of 23.29%. Alpha & Omega Semiconductor's return on equity of -2.17% beat Monolithic Power Systems's return on equity of 20.38%.

Alpha & Omega Semiconductor has a consensus price target of $38.00, signalling downside risk potential of -4.49%. On the other hand Monolithic Power Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 30.69%. Given that Monolithic Power Systems has higher upside potential than Alpha & Omega Semiconductor, analysts believe Monolithic Power Systems is more attractive than Alpha & Omega Semiconductor.

Alpha & Omega Semiconductor has a beta of 2.478, which suggesting that the stock is 147.752% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Monolithic Power Systems has a beta of 1.049, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.934%.

Alpha & Omega Semiconductor has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Monolithic Power Systems offers a yield of 0.77% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.25 per share. Alpha & Omega Semiconductor pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Monolithic Power Systems pays out 43.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Monolithic Power Systems's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Alpha & Omega Semiconductor quarterly revenues are $181.9M, which are smaller than Monolithic Power Systems quarterly revenues of $620.1M. Alpha & Omega Semiconductor's net income of -$2.5M is lower than Monolithic Power Systems's net income of $144.4M. Notably, Alpha & Omega Semiconductor's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Monolithic Power Systems's PE ratio is 69.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alpha & Omega Semiconductor is 1.73x versus 14.86x for Monolithic Power Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NVIDIA has a net margin of -1.37% compared to Alpha & Omega Semiconductor's net margin of 55.04%. Alpha & Omega Semiconductor's return on equity of -2.17% beat NVIDIA's return on equity of 126.43%.

Alpha & Omega Semiconductor has a consensus price target of $38.00, signalling downside risk potential of -4.49%. On the other hand NVIDIA has an analysts' consensus of $172.80 which suggests that it could grow by 23.24%. Given that NVIDIA has higher upside potential than Alpha & Omega Semiconductor, analysts believe NVIDIA is more attractive than Alpha & Omega Semiconductor.

Alpha & Omega Semiconductor has a beta of 2.478, which suggesting that the stock is 147.752% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA has a beta of 1.635, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.477%.

Alpha & Omega Semiconductor has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NVIDIA offers a yield of 0.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Alpha & Omega Semiconductor pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA pays out 1.33% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Alpha & Omega Semiconductor quarterly revenues are $181.9M, which are smaller than NVIDIA quarterly revenues of $35.1B. Alpha & Omega Semiconductor's net income of -$2.5M is lower than NVIDIA's net income of $19.3B. Notably, Alpha & Omega Semiconductor's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NVIDIA's PE ratio is 55.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alpha & Omega Semiconductor is 1.73x versus 30.78x for NVIDIA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PDF Solutions has a net margin of -1.37% compared to Alpha & Omega Semiconductor's net margin of 4.75%. Alpha & Omega Semiconductor's return on equity of -2.17% beat PDF Solutions's return on equity of 1.92%.

Alpha & Omega Semiconductor has a consensus price target of $38.00, signalling downside risk potential of -4.49%. On the other hand PDF Solutions has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 49.42%. Given that PDF Solutions has higher upside potential than Alpha & Omega Semiconductor, analysts believe PDF Solutions is more attractive than Alpha & Omega Semiconductor.

Alpha & Omega Semiconductor has a beta of 2.478, which suggesting that the stock is 147.752% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PDF Solutions has a beta of 1.506, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.58%.

Alpha & Omega Semiconductor has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PDF Solutions offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alpha & Omega Semiconductor pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PDF Solutions pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Alpha & Omega Semiconductor quarterly revenues are $181.9M, which are larger than PDF Solutions quarterly revenues of $46.4M. Alpha & Omega Semiconductor's net income of -$2.5M is lower than PDF Solutions's net income of $2.2M. Notably, Alpha & Omega Semiconductor's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while PDF Solutions's PE ratio is 260.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alpha & Omega Semiconductor is 1.73x versus 6.53x for PDF Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.