Is Alphabet an Undervalued Growth Stock to Buy?
Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) is easily one of the most successful companies…
Sell
40
TRI.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$234.13
Seasonality move
:
3.73%
Day range:
$232.49 - $234.95
52-week range:
$188.00 - $243.42
Dividend yield:
1.26%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
12.76x
P/B ratio:
6.55x
Volume:
152.2K
Avg. volume:
321.4K
1-year change:
23.64%
Market cap:
$110.5B
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TRI.TO
Thomson Reuters
|
$2.4B | $1.07 | 6.85% | -40.09% | -- |
|
BAC.CX
Bactech Environmental
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DOCT.CX
Beyond Medical Technologies
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LUX.CX
Newlox Gold Ventures
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PKG.CX
ParcelPal Logistics
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SHRC.CX
Sharc International Systems
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TRI.TO
Thomson Reuters
|
$234.53 | -- | $110.5B | -- | $0.75 | 1.26% | 12.76x |
|
BAC.CX
Bactech Environmental
|
$0.0300 | -- | $5.8M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
DOCT.CX
Beyond Medical Technologies
|
$0.04 | -- | $316.6K | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
LUX.CX
Newlox Gold Ventures
|
$0.1000 | -- | $15.6M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 8.44x |
|
PKG.CX
ParcelPal Logistics
|
$0.02 | -- | $466.3K | -- | $7,612,115.00 | 0% | 0.03x |
|
SHRC.CX
Sharc International Systems
|
$0.15 | -- | $24M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 10.73x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TRI.TO
Thomson Reuters
|
-- | 0.034 | -- | -- |
|
BAC.CX
Bactech Environmental
|
-- | 0.238 | -- | -- |
|
DOCT.CX
Beyond Medical Technologies
|
-- | 2.219 | -- | -- |
|
LUX.CX
Newlox Gold Ventures
|
96.33% | 1.088 | 24.29% | 0.02x |
|
PKG.CX
ParcelPal Logistics
|
-- | -444,320,809.641 | -- | -- |
|
SHRC.CX
Sharc International Systems
|
59.57% | 5.264 | 7.72% | 2.31x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TRI.TO
Thomson Reuters
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BAC.CX
Bactech Environmental
|
-- | -$269.2K | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DOCT.CX
Beyond Medical Technologies
|
-- | -$100.3K | -- | -- | -- | $17.8K |
|
LUX.CX
Newlox Gold Ventures
|
$139.8K | -$631K | -100.39% | -271.28% | -160.42% | -$74.3K |
|
PKG.CX
ParcelPal Logistics
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SHRC.CX
Sharc International Systems
|
$248.9K | -$817.3K | -140.28% | -160.68% | -105.4% | -$353.4K |
Thomson Reuters vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns TRI.TO or BAC.CX?
Bactech Environmental has a net margin of -- compared to Thomson Reuters's net margin of --. Thomson Reuters's return on equity of -- beat Bactech Environmental's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TRI.TOThomson Reuters-- -- -- BAC.CXBactech Environmental-- -$0.00 -- -
What do Analysts Say About TRI.TO or BAC.CX?
Thomson Reuters has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 4.19%. On the other hand Bactech Environmental has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Thomson Reuters has higher upside potential than Bactech Environmental, analysts believe Thomson Reuters is more attractive than Bactech Environmental.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TRI.TOThomson Reuters2 9 1 BAC.CXBactech Environmental0 0 0 -
Is TRI.TO or BAC.CX More Risky?
Thomson Reuters has a beta of 0.411, which suggesting that the stock is 58.905% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bactech Environmental has a beta of 0.324, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.644%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TRI.TO or BAC.CX?
Thomson Reuters has a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.26%. Bactech Environmental offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Thomson Reuters pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bactech Environmental pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TRI.TO or BAC.CX?
Thomson Reuters quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Bactech Environmental quarterly revenues of --. Thomson Reuters's net income of -- is lower than Bactech Environmental's net income of -$293.5K. Notably, Thomson Reuters's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Bactech Environmental's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Thomson Reuters is 12.76x versus -- for Bactech Environmental. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TRI.TOThomson Reuters12.76x -- -- -- BAC.CXBactech Environmental-- -- -- -$293.5K
-
Which has Higher Returns TRI.TO or DOCT.CX?
Beyond Medical Technologies has a net margin of -- compared to Thomson Reuters's net margin of --. Thomson Reuters's return on equity of -- beat Beyond Medical Technologies's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TRI.TOThomson Reuters-- -- -- DOCT.CXBeyond Medical Technologies-- -$0.01 -- -
What do Analysts Say About TRI.TO or DOCT.CX?
Thomson Reuters has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 4.19%. On the other hand Beyond Medical Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Thomson Reuters has higher upside potential than Beyond Medical Technologies, analysts believe Thomson Reuters is more attractive than Beyond Medical Technologies.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TRI.TOThomson Reuters2 9 1 DOCT.CXBeyond Medical Technologies0 0 0 -
Is TRI.TO or DOCT.CX More Risky?
Thomson Reuters has a beta of 0.411, which suggesting that the stock is 58.905% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Beyond Medical Technologies has a beta of 3.116, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 211.556%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TRI.TO or DOCT.CX?
Thomson Reuters has a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.26%. Beyond Medical Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Thomson Reuters pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Beyond Medical Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TRI.TO or DOCT.CX?
Thomson Reuters quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Beyond Medical Technologies quarterly revenues of --. Thomson Reuters's net income of -- is lower than Beyond Medical Technologies's net income of -$100.2K. Notably, Thomson Reuters's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Beyond Medical Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Thomson Reuters is 12.76x versus -- for Beyond Medical Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TRI.TOThomson Reuters12.76x -- -- -- DOCT.CXBeyond Medical Technologies-- -- -- -$100.2K
-
Which has Higher Returns TRI.TO or LUX.CX?
Newlox Gold Ventures has a net margin of -- compared to Thomson Reuters's net margin of -213.66%. Thomson Reuters's return on equity of -- beat Newlox Gold Ventures's return on equity of -271.28%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TRI.TOThomson Reuters-- -- -- LUX.CXNewlox Gold Ventures35.35% -$0.01 $4.3M -
What do Analysts Say About TRI.TO or LUX.CX?
Thomson Reuters has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 4.19%. On the other hand Newlox Gold Ventures has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Thomson Reuters has higher upside potential than Newlox Gold Ventures, analysts believe Thomson Reuters is more attractive than Newlox Gold Ventures.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TRI.TOThomson Reuters2 9 1 LUX.CXNewlox Gold Ventures0 0 0 -
Is TRI.TO or LUX.CX More Risky?
Thomson Reuters has a beta of 0.411, which suggesting that the stock is 58.905% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Newlox Gold Ventures has a beta of 2.160, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 115.991%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TRI.TO or LUX.CX?
Thomson Reuters has a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.26%. Newlox Gold Ventures offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Thomson Reuters pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Newlox Gold Ventures pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TRI.TO or LUX.CX?
Thomson Reuters quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Newlox Gold Ventures quarterly revenues of $395.5K. Thomson Reuters's net income of -- is lower than Newlox Gold Ventures's net income of -$845.1K. Notably, Thomson Reuters's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Newlox Gold Ventures's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Thomson Reuters is 12.76x versus 8.44x for Newlox Gold Ventures. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TRI.TOThomson Reuters12.76x -- -- -- LUX.CXNewlox Gold Ventures8.44x -- $395.5K -$845.1K
-
Which has Higher Returns TRI.TO or PKG.CX?
ParcelPal Logistics has a net margin of -- compared to Thomson Reuters's net margin of --. Thomson Reuters's return on equity of -- beat ParcelPal Logistics's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TRI.TOThomson Reuters-- -- -- PKG.CXParcelPal Logistics-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About TRI.TO or PKG.CX?
Thomson Reuters has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 4.19%. On the other hand ParcelPal Logistics has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Thomson Reuters has higher upside potential than ParcelPal Logistics, analysts believe Thomson Reuters is more attractive than ParcelPal Logistics.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TRI.TOThomson Reuters2 9 1 PKG.CXParcelPal Logistics0 0 0 -
Is TRI.TO or PKG.CX More Risky?
Thomson Reuters has a beta of 0.411, which suggesting that the stock is 58.905% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ParcelPal Logistics has a beta of -23,182,302.869, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2318230386.882%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TRI.TO or PKG.CX?
Thomson Reuters has a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.26%. ParcelPal Logistics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $7,612,115.00 per share. Thomson Reuters pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ParcelPal Logistics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TRI.TO or PKG.CX?
Thomson Reuters quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ParcelPal Logistics quarterly revenues of --. Thomson Reuters's net income of -- is lower than ParcelPal Logistics's net income of --. Notably, Thomson Reuters's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ParcelPal Logistics's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Thomson Reuters is 12.76x versus 0.03x for ParcelPal Logistics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TRI.TOThomson Reuters12.76x -- -- -- PKG.CXParcelPal Logistics0.03x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns TRI.TO or SHRC.CX?
Sharc International Systems has a net margin of -- compared to Thomson Reuters's net margin of -105.98%. Thomson Reuters's return on equity of -- beat Sharc International Systems's return on equity of -160.68%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TRI.TOThomson Reuters-- -- -- SHRC.CXSharc International Systems31.71% -$0.01 $2.8M -
What do Analysts Say About TRI.TO or SHRC.CX?
Thomson Reuters has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 4.19%. On the other hand Sharc International Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Thomson Reuters has higher upside potential than Sharc International Systems, analysts believe Thomson Reuters is more attractive than Sharc International Systems.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TRI.TOThomson Reuters2 9 1 SHRC.CXSharc International Systems0 0 0 -
Is TRI.TO or SHRC.CX More Risky?
Thomson Reuters has a beta of 0.411, which suggesting that the stock is 58.905% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sharc International Systems has a beta of 0.557, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.323%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TRI.TO or SHRC.CX?
Thomson Reuters has a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.26%. Sharc International Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Thomson Reuters pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sharc International Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TRI.TO or SHRC.CX?
Thomson Reuters quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sharc International Systems quarterly revenues of $785K. Thomson Reuters's net income of -- is lower than Sharc International Systems's net income of -$832K. Notably, Thomson Reuters's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sharc International Systems's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Thomson Reuters is 12.76x versus 10.73x for Sharc International Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TRI.TOThomson Reuters12.76x -- -- -- SHRC.CXSharc International Systems10.73x -- $785K -$832K
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Tesla Going to Buy Uber?
Tesla has always been in the habit of making large,…
NVIDIA vs Broadcom Stock: Which Is Best?
If you want to invest in an AI-leading tech company,…
Stock Ideas
Buy
65
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 117x
Buy
53
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
52
TSLL alert for Dec 24
Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X Shares [TSLL] is up 19.46% over the past day.
Buy
73
PSIX alert for Dec 24
Power Solutions International [PSIX] is up 27.42% over the past day.
Sell
31
SOXL alert for Dec 24
Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X Shares [SOXL] is up 11.87% over the past day.
