RUS.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Beyond Medical Technologies has a net margin of 3.17% compared to Russel Metals's net margin of --. Russel Metals's return on equity of 11.01% beat Beyond Medical Technologies's return on equity of --.

Russel Metals has a consensus price target of $49.19, signalling upside risk potential of 24.83%. On the other hand Beyond Medical Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Russel Metals has higher upside potential than Beyond Medical Technologies, analysts believe Russel Metals is more attractive than Beyond Medical Technologies.

Russel Metals has a beta of 1.615, which suggesting that the stock is 61.503% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Beyond Medical Technologies has a beta of 3.116, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 211.556%.

Russel Metals has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.9%. Beyond Medical Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Russel Metals pays 36.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Beyond Medical Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Russel Metals's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Russel Metals quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Beyond Medical Technologies quarterly revenues of --. Russel Metals's net income of $34.5M is higher than Beyond Medical Technologies's net income of -$100.2K. Notably, Russel Metals's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.06x while Beyond Medical Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Russel Metals is 0.60x versus -- for Beyond Medical Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Newlox Gold Ventures has a net margin of 3.17% compared to Russel Metals's net margin of -213.66%. Russel Metals's return on equity of 11.01% beat Newlox Gold Ventures's return on equity of -271.28%.

Russel Metals has a consensus price target of $49.19, signalling upside risk potential of 24.83%. On the other hand Newlox Gold Ventures has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Russel Metals has higher upside potential than Newlox Gold Ventures, analysts believe Russel Metals is more attractive than Newlox Gold Ventures.

Russel Metals has a beta of 1.615, which suggesting that the stock is 61.503% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Newlox Gold Ventures has a beta of 2.160, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 115.991%.

Russel Metals has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.9%. Newlox Gold Ventures offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Russel Metals pays 36.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Newlox Gold Ventures pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Russel Metals's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Russel Metals quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Newlox Gold Ventures quarterly revenues of $395.5K. Russel Metals's net income of $34.5M is higher than Newlox Gold Ventures's net income of -$845.1K. Notably, Russel Metals's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.06x while Newlox Gold Ventures's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Russel Metals is 0.60x versus 8.44x for Newlox Gold Ventures. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ParcelPal Logistics has a net margin of 3.17% compared to Russel Metals's net margin of --. Russel Metals's return on equity of 11.01% beat ParcelPal Logistics's return on equity of --.

Russel Metals has a consensus price target of $49.19, signalling upside risk potential of 24.83%. On the other hand ParcelPal Logistics has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Russel Metals has higher upside potential than ParcelPal Logistics, analysts believe Russel Metals is more attractive than ParcelPal Logistics.

Russel Metals has a beta of 1.615, which suggesting that the stock is 61.503% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ParcelPal Logistics has a beta of -23,182,302.869, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2318230386.882%.

Russel Metals has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.9%. ParcelPal Logistics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $7,612,115.00 per share. Russel Metals pays 36.45% of its earnings as a dividend. ParcelPal Logistics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Russel Metals's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Russel Metals quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than ParcelPal Logistics quarterly revenues of --. Russel Metals's net income of $34.5M is higher than ParcelPal Logistics's net income of --. Notably, Russel Metals's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.06x while ParcelPal Logistics's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Russel Metals is 0.60x versus 0.03x for ParcelPal Logistics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sharc International Systems has a net margin of 3.17% compared to Russel Metals's net margin of -105.98%. Russel Metals's return on equity of 11.01% beat Sharc International Systems's return on equity of -160.68%.

Russel Metals has a consensus price target of $49.19, signalling upside risk potential of 24.83%. On the other hand Sharc International Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Russel Metals has higher upside potential than Sharc International Systems, analysts believe Russel Metals is more attractive than Sharc International Systems.

Russel Metals has a beta of 1.615, which suggesting that the stock is 61.503% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sharc International Systems has a beta of 0.557, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.323%.

Russel Metals has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.9%. Sharc International Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Russel Metals pays 36.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Sharc International Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Russel Metals's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Russel Metals quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Sharc International Systems quarterly revenues of $785K. Russel Metals's net income of $34.5M is higher than Sharc International Systems's net income of -$832K. Notably, Russel Metals's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.06x while Sharc International Systems's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Russel Metals is 0.60x versus 10.73x for Sharc International Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.