EIF.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Badger Infrastructure Solutions has a net margin of 7.87% compared to Exchange Income's net margin of 11.14%. Exchange Income's return on equity of 9.74% beat Badger Infrastructure Solutions's return on equity of 16.86%.

Exchange Income has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 19.98%. On the other hand Badger Infrastructure Solutions has an analysts' consensus of $54.11 which suggests that it could grow by 36.02%. Given that Badger Infrastructure Solutions has higher upside potential than Exchange Income, analysts believe Badger Infrastructure Solutions is more attractive than Exchange Income.

Exchange Income has a beta of 1.919, which suggesting that the stock is 91.854% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Badger Infrastructure Solutions has a beta of 1.116, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.579%.

Exchange Income has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.57%. Badger Infrastructure Solutions offers a yield of 1.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Exchange Income pays 93.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Badger Infrastructure Solutions pays out 41.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Exchange Income quarterly revenues are $709.9M, which are larger than Badger Infrastructure Solutions quarterly revenues of $285.7M. Exchange Income's net income of $55.9M is higher than Badger Infrastructure Solutions's net income of $31.8M. Notably, Exchange Income's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.58x while Badger Infrastructure Solutions's PE ratio is 21.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Exchange Income is 1.16x versus 1.25x for Badger Infrastructure Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Calian Group has a net margin of 7.87% compared to Exchange Income's net margin of -0.31%. Exchange Income's return on equity of 9.74% beat Calian Group's return on equity of 3.38%.

Exchange Income has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 19.98%. On the other hand Calian Group has an analysts' consensus of $76.25 which suggests that it could grow by 51.15%. Given that Calian Group has higher upside potential than Exchange Income, analysts believe Calian Group is more attractive than Exchange Income.

Exchange Income has a beta of 1.919, which suggesting that the stock is 91.854% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Calian Group has a beta of 0.820, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.954%.

Exchange Income has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.57%. Calian Group offers a yield of 2.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Exchange Income pays 93.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Calian Group pays out 119.42% of its earnings as a dividend. Exchange Income's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Calian Group's is not.

Exchange Income quarterly revenues are $709.9M, which are larger than Calian Group quarterly revenues of $181.2M. Exchange Income's net income of $55.9M is higher than Calian Group's net income of -$568K. Notably, Exchange Income's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.58x while Calian Group's PE ratio is 50.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Exchange Income is 1.16x versus 0.75x for Calian Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Canadian National Railway has a net margin of 7.87% compared to Exchange Income's net margin of 26.4%. Exchange Income's return on equity of 9.74% beat Canadian National Railway's return on equity of 27.49%.

Exchange Income has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 19.98%. On the other hand Canadian National Railway has an analysts' consensus of $173.43 which suggests that it could grow by 17.79%. Given that Exchange Income has higher upside potential than Canadian National Railway, analysts believe Exchange Income is more attractive than Canadian National Railway.

Exchange Income has a beta of 1.919, which suggesting that the stock is 91.854% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Canadian National Railway has a beta of 0.682, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.759%.

Exchange Income has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.57%. Canadian National Railway offers a yield of 2.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.85 per share. Exchange Income pays 93.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Canadian National Railway pays out 36.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Exchange Income quarterly revenues are $709.9M, which are smaller than Canadian National Railway quarterly revenues of $4.1B. Exchange Income's net income of $55.9M is lower than Canadian National Railway's net income of $1.1B. Notably, Exchange Income's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.58x while Canadian National Railway's PE ratio is 17.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Exchange Income is 1.16x versus 5.48x for Canadian National Railway. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Canadian Pacific Kansas City has a net margin of 7.87% compared to Exchange Income's net margin of 23.58%. Exchange Income's return on equity of 9.74% beat Canadian Pacific Kansas City's return on equity of 8.11%.

Exchange Income has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 19.98%. On the other hand Canadian Pacific Kansas City has an analysts' consensus of $127.35 which suggests that it could grow by 21.14%. Given that Canadian Pacific Kansas City has higher upside potential than Exchange Income, analysts believe Canadian Pacific Kansas City is more attractive than Exchange Income.

Exchange Income has a beta of 1.919, which suggesting that the stock is 91.854% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Canadian Pacific Kansas City has a beta of 0.803, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.661%.

Exchange Income has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.57%. Canadian Pacific Kansas City offers a yield of 0.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. Exchange Income pays 93.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Canadian Pacific Kansas City pays out 18% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Exchange Income quarterly revenues are $709.9M, which are smaller than Canadian Pacific Kansas City quarterly revenues of $3.5B. Exchange Income's net income of $55.9M is lower than Canadian Pacific Kansas City's net income of $837M. Notably, Exchange Income's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.58x while Canadian Pacific Kansas City's PE ratio is 27.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Exchange Income is 1.16x versus 6.80x for Canadian Pacific Kansas City. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.