BRK.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Brookfield Business has a net margin of 19.41% compared to Berkshire Hathaway's net margin of -17.93%. Berkshire Hathaway's return on equity of 14.65% beat Brookfield Business's return on equity of -21.77%.

Berkshire Hathaway has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Brookfield Business has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Berkshire Hathaway has higher upside potential than Brookfield Business, analysts believe Berkshire Hathaway is more attractive than Brookfield Business.

Berkshire Hathaway has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Brookfield Business has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Berkshire Hathaway has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Brookfield Business offers a yield of 1.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Berkshire Hathaway pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Brookfield Business pays out -2.03% of its earnings as a dividend.

Berkshire Hathaway quarterly revenues are $141.2B, which are larger than Brookfield Business quarterly revenues of $3.1B. Berkshire Hathaway's net income of $27.4B is higher than Brookfield Business's net income of -$550.9M. Notably, Berkshire Hathaway's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.39x while Brookfield Business's PE ratio is 3.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Berkshire Hathaway is 2.60x versus 0.21x for Brookfield Business. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cypher Metaverse has a net margin of 19.41% compared to Berkshire Hathaway's net margin of --. Berkshire Hathaway's return on equity of 14.65% beat Cypher Metaverse's return on equity of --.

Berkshire Hathaway has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Cypher Metaverse has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Berkshire Hathaway has higher upside potential than Cypher Metaverse, analysts believe Berkshire Hathaway is more attractive than Cypher Metaverse.

Berkshire Hathaway has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cypher Metaverse has a beta of 7.875, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 687.509%.

Berkshire Hathaway has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cypher Metaverse offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Berkshire Hathaway pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cypher Metaverse pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Berkshire Hathaway quarterly revenues are $141.2B, which are larger than Cypher Metaverse quarterly revenues of --. Berkshire Hathaway's net income of $27.4B is higher than Cypher Metaverse's net income of --. Notably, Berkshire Hathaway's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.39x while Cypher Metaverse's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Berkshire Hathaway is 2.60x versus -- for Cypher Metaverse. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Galaxy Digital Holdings has a net margin of 19.41% compared to Berkshire Hathaway's net margin of --. Berkshire Hathaway's return on equity of 14.65% beat Galaxy Digital Holdings's return on equity of --.

Berkshire Hathaway has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Galaxy Digital Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $33.94 which suggests that it could grow by 117.87%. Given that Galaxy Digital Holdings has higher upside potential than Berkshire Hathaway, analysts believe Galaxy Digital Holdings is more attractive than Berkshire Hathaway.

Berkshire Hathaway has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Galaxy Digital Holdings has a beta of 4.104, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 310.418%.

Berkshire Hathaway has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Galaxy Digital Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Berkshire Hathaway pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Galaxy Digital Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Berkshire Hathaway quarterly revenues are $141.2B, which are larger than Galaxy Digital Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Berkshire Hathaway's net income of $27.4B is higher than Galaxy Digital Holdings's net income of -$22.4M. Notably, Berkshire Hathaway's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.39x while Galaxy Digital Holdings's PE ratio is 22.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Berkshire Hathaway is 2.60x versus -- for Galaxy Digital Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

New Frontier Ventures has a net margin of 19.41% compared to Berkshire Hathaway's net margin of --. Berkshire Hathaway's return on equity of 14.65% beat New Frontier Ventures's return on equity of --.

Berkshire Hathaway has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand New Frontier Ventures has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Berkshire Hathaway has higher upside potential than New Frontier Ventures, analysts believe Berkshire Hathaway is more attractive than New Frontier Ventures.

Berkshire Hathaway has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison New Frontier Ventures has a beta of -0.198, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 119.822%.

Berkshire Hathaway has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. New Frontier Ventures offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Berkshire Hathaway pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. New Frontier Ventures pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Berkshire Hathaway quarterly revenues are $141.2B, which are larger than New Frontier Ventures quarterly revenues of --. Berkshire Hathaway's net income of $27.4B is higher than New Frontier Ventures's net income of -$19.4K. Notably, Berkshire Hathaway's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.39x while New Frontier Ventures's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Berkshire Hathaway is 2.60x versus 29.96x for New Frontier Ventures. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.