XRX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Broadridge Financial Solutions has a net margin of -78.86% compared to Xerox Holdings's net margin of 5.61%. Xerox Holdings's return on equity of -56.16% beat Broadridge Financial Solutions's return on equity of 31.74%.

Xerox Holdings has a consensus price target of $16.60, signalling downside risk potential of -7.63%. On the other hand Broadridge Financial Solutions has an analysts' consensus of $215.55 which suggests that it could grow by 0.22%. Given that Broadridge Financial Solutions has higher upside potential than Xerox Holdings, analysts believe Broadridge Financial Solutions is more attractive than Xerox Holdings.

Xerox Holdings has a beta of 1.586, which suggesting that the stock is 58.596% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Broadridge Financial Solutions has a beta of 1.074, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.438%.

Xerox Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.92%. Broadridge Financial Solutions offers a yield of 1.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.88 per share. Xerox Holdings pays 16500% of its earnings as a dividend. Broadridge Financial Solutions pays out 52.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Broadridge Financial Solutions's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Xerox Holdings's is not.

Xerox Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Broadridge Financial Solutions quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Xerox Holdings's net income of -$1.2B is lower than Broadridge Financial Solutions's net income of $79.8M. Notably, Xerox Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Broadridge Financial Solutions's PE ratio is 39.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Xerox Holdings is 0.16x versus 4.13x for Broadridge Financial Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Fidelity National Information Services has a net margin of -78.86% compared to Xerox Holdings's net margin of 8.72%. Xerox Holdings's return on equity of -56.16% beat Fidelity National Information Services's return on equity of 7.99%.

Xerox Holdings has a consensus price target of $16.60, signalling downside risk potential of -7.63%. On the other hand Fidelity National Information Services has an analysts' consensus of $95.71 which suggests that it could grow by 17.5%. Given that Fidelity National Information Services has higher upside potential than Xerox Holdings, analysts believe Fidelity National Information Services is more attractive than Xerox Holdings.

Xerox Holdings has a beta of 1.586, which suggesting that the stock is 58.596% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fidelity National Information Services has a beta of 1.035, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.493%.

Xerox Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.92%. Fidelity National Information Services offers a yield of 1.77% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. Xerox Holdings pays 16500% of its earnings as a dividend. Fidelity National Information Services pays out -18.5% of its earnings as a dividend.

Xerox Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are smaller than Fidelity National Information Services quarterly revenues of $2.6B. Xerox Holdings's net income of -$1.2B is lower than Fidelity National Information Services's net income of $224M. Notably, Xerox Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Fidelity National Information Services's PE ratio is 32.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Xerox Holdings is 0.16x versus 4.61x for Fidelity National Information Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wolfspeed has a net margin of -78.86% compared to Xerox Holdings's net margin of -144.94%. Xerox Holdings's return on equity of -56.16% beat Wolfspeed's return on equity of -76.14%.

Xerox Holdings has a consensus price target of $16.60, signalling downside risk potential of -7.63%. On the other hand Wolfspeed has an analysts' consensus of $28.02 which suggests that it could grow by 98.11%. Given that Wolfspeed has higher upside potential than Xerox Holdings, analysts believe Wolfspeed is more attractive than Xerox Holdings.

Xerox Holdings has a beta of 1.586, which suggesting that the stock is 58.596% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wolfspeed has a beta of 1.379, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.862%.

Xerox Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.92%. Wolfspeed offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Xerox Holdings pays 16500% of its earnings as a dividend. Wolfspeed pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Xerox Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Wolfspeed quarterly revenues of $194.7M. Xerox Holdings's net income of -$1.2B is lower than Wolfspeed's net income of -$282.2M. Notably, Xerox Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Wolfspeed's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Xerox Holdings is 0.16x versus 1.10x for Wolfspeed. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zeta Global Holdings has a net margin of -78.86% compared to Xerox Holdings's net margin of -6.48%. Xerox Holdings's return on equity of -56.16% beat Zeta Global Holdings's return on equity of -49.55%.

Xerox Holdings has a consensus price target of $16.60, signalling downside risk potential of -7.63%. On the other hand Zeta Global Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $37.77 which suggests that it could grow by 94.69%. Given that Zeta Global Holdings has higher upside potential than Xerox Holdings, analysts believe Zeta Global Holdings is more attractive than Xerox Holdings.

Xerox Holdings has a beta of 1.586, which suggesting that the stock is 58.596% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zeta Global Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Xerox Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.92%. Zeta Global Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Xerox Holdings pays 16500% of its earnings as a dividend. Zeta Global Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Xerox Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Zeta Global Holdings quarterly revenues of $268.3M. Xerox Holdings's net income of -$1.2B is lower than Zeta Global Holdings's net income of -$17.4M. Notably, Xerox Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Zeta Global Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Xerox Holdings is 0.16x versus 3.77x for Zeta Global Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.