VRSN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Exodus Movement has a net margin of 48.43% compared to VeriSign's net margin of 4.19%. VeriSign's return on equity of -- beat Exodus Movement's return on equity of 59.94%.

VeriSign has a consensus price target of $230.28, signalling downside risk potential of -4.93%. On the other hand Exodus Movement has an analysts' consensus of $50.00 which suggests that it could grow by 3.07%. Given that Exodus Movement has higher upside potential than VeriSign, analysts believe Exodus Movement is more attractive than VeriSign.

VeriSign has a beta of 0.870, which suggesting that the stock is 12.974% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Exodus Movement has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

VeriSign has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Exodus Movement offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. VeriSign pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Exodus Movement pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

VeriSign quarterly revenues are $395.4M, which are larger than Exodus Movement quarterly revenues of $46M. VeriSign's net income of $191.5M is higher than Exodus Movement's net income of $66.9M. Notably, VeriSign's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.28x while Exodus Movement's PE ratio is 13.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VeriSign is 15.27x versus 12.57x for Exodus Movement. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Grid Dynamics Holdings has a net margin of 48.43% compared to VeriSign's net margin of 4.51%. VeriSign's return on equity of -- beat Grid Dynamics Holdings's return on equity of 0.98%.

VeriSign has a consensus price target of $230.28, signalling downside risk potential of -4.93%. On the other hand Grid Dynamics Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $26.00 which suggests that it could grow by 59.02%. Given that Grid Dynamics Holdings has higher upside potential than VeriSign, analysts believe Grid Dynamics Holdings is more attractive than VeriSign.

VeriSign has a beta of 0.870, which suggesting that the stock is 12.974% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Grid Dynamics Holdings has a beta of 1.100, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.01%.

VeriSign has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Grid Dynamics Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. VeriSign pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Grid Dynamics Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

VeriSign quarterly revenues are $395.4M, which are larger than Grid Dynamics Holdings quarterly revenues of $100.3M. VeriSign's net income of $191.5M is higher than Grid Dynamics Holdings's net income of $4.5M. Notably, VeriSign's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.28x while Grid Dynamics Holdings's PE ratio is 408.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VeriSign is 15.27x versus 3.75x for Grid Dynamics Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marti Technologies has a net margin of 48.43% compared to VeriSign's net margin of --. VeriSign's return on equity of -- beat Marti Technologies's return on equity of --.

VeriSign has a consensus price target of $230.28, signalling downside risk potential of -4.93%. On the other hand Marti Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $3.00 which suggests that it could fall by -5.81%. Given that Marti Technologies has more downside risk than VeriSign, analysts believe VeriSign is more attractive than Marti Technologies.

VeriSign has a beta of 0.870, which suggesting that the stock is 12.974% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marti Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

VeriSign has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Marti Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. VeriSign pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Marti Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

VeriSign quarterly revenues are $395.4M, which are larger than Marti Technologies quarterly revenues of --. VeriSign's net income of $191.5M is higher than Marti Technologies's net income of --. Notably, VeriSign's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.28x while Marti Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VeriSign is 15.27x versus 9.47x for Marti Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Trade Desk has a net margin of 48.43% compared to VeriSign's net margin of 24.59%. VeriSign's return on equity of -- beat The Trade Desk's return on equity of 15.96%.

VeriSign has a consensus price target of $230.28, signalling downside risk potential of -4.93%. On the other hand The Trade Desk has an analysts' consensus of $109.58 which suggests that it could grow by 98.09%. Given that The Trade Desk has higher upside potential than VeriSign, analysts believe The Trade Desk is more attractive than VeriSign.

VeriSign has a beta of 0.870, which suggesting that the stock is 12.974% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Trade Desk has a beta of 1.625, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.516%.

VeriSign has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The Trade Desk offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. VeriSign pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Trade Desk pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

VeriSign quarterly revenues are $395.4M, which are smaller than The Trade Desk quarterly revenues of $741M. VeriSign's net income of $191.5M is higher than The Trade Desk's net income of $182.2M. Notably, VeriSign's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.28x while The Trade Desk's PE ratio is 70.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VeriSign is 15.27x versus 11.36x for The Trade Desk. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.