UHS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Community Health Systems has a net margin of 6.53% compared to Universal Health Services's net margin of -12.65%. Universal Health Services's return on equity of 16.1% beat Community Health Systems's return on equity of --.

Universal Health Services has a consensus price target of $238.21, signalling upside risk potential of 32.26%. On the other hand Community Health Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 55.06%. Given that Community Health Systems has higher upside potential than Universal Health Services, analysts believe Community Health Systems is more attractive than Universal Health Services.

Universal Health Services has a beta of 1.278, which suggesting that the stock is 27.787% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Community Health Systems has a beta of 1.549, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.916%.

Universal Health Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.44%. Community Health Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Universal Health Services pays 7.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Community Health Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Universal Health Services's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Universal Health Services quarterly revenues are $4B, which are larger than Community Health Systems quarterly revenues of $3.1B. Universal Health Services's net income of $258.7M is higher than Community Health Systems's net income of -$391M. Notably, Universal Health Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.99x while Community Health Systems's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Universal Health Services is 0.80x versus 0.03x for Community Health Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

HCA Healthcare has a net margin of 6.53% compared to Universal Health Services's net margin of 7.26%. Universal Health Services's return on equity of 16.1% beat HCA Healthcare's return on equity of 616.06%.

Universal Health Services has a consensus price target of $238.21, signalling upside risk potential of 32.26%. On the other hand HCA Healthcare has an analysts' consensus of $398.84 which suggests that it could grow by 31.36%. Given that Universal Health Services has higher upside potential than HCA Healthcare, analysts believe Universal Health Services is more attractive than HCA Healthcare.

Universal Health Services has a beta of 1.278, which suggesting that the stock is 27.787% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison HCA Healthcare has a beta of 1.632, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.178%.

Universal Health Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.44%. HCA Healthcare offers a yield of 0.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share. Universal Health Services pays 7.73% of its earnings as a dividend. HCA Healthcare pays out 12.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Universal Health Services quarterly revenues are $4B, which are smaller than HCA Healthcare quarterly revenues of $17.5B. Universal Health Services's net income of $258.7M is lower than HCA Healthcare's net income of $1.3B. Notably, Universal Health Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.99x while HCA Healthcare's PE ratio is 13.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Universal Health Services is 0.80x versus 1.16x for HCA Healthcare. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nutex Health has a net margin of 6.53% compared to Universal Health Services's net margin of -11.15%. Universal Health Services's return on equity of 16.1% beat Nutex Health's return on equity of -48.3%.

Universal Health Services has a consensus price target of $238.21, signalling upside risk potential of 32.26%. On the other hand Nutex Health has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 88.34%. Given that Nutex Health has higher upside potential than Universal Health Services, analysts believe Nutex Health is more attractive than Universal Health Services.

Universal Health Services has a beta of 1.278, which suggesting that the stock is 27.787% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nutex Health has a beta of 0.120, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 87.954%.

Universal Health Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.44%. Nutex Health offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Universal Health Services pays 7.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Nutex Health pays out -11.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Universal Health Services's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Universal Health Services quarterly revenues are $4B, which are larger than Nutex Health quarterly revenues of $78.8M. Universal Health Services's net income of $258.7M is higher than Nutex Health's net income of -$8.8M. Notably, Universal Health Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.99x while Nutex Health's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Universal Health Services is 0.80x versus 0.37x for Nutex Health. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tenet Healthcare has a net margin of 6.53% compared to Universal Health Services's net margin of 9.22%. Universal Health Services's return on equity of 16.1% beat Tenet Healthcare's return on equity of 45.56%.

Universal Health Services has a consensus price target of $238.21, signalling upside risk potential of 32.26%. On the other hand Tenet Healthcare has an analysts' consensus of $179.46 which suggests that it could grow by 38.62%. Given that Tenet Healthcare has higher upside potential than Universal Health Services, analysts believe Tenet Healthcare is more attractive than Universal Health Services.

Universal Health Services has a beta of 1.278, which suggesting that the stock is 27.787% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tenet Healthcare has a beta of 2.060, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 105.97%.

Universal Health Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.44%. Tenet Healthcare offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Universal Health Services pays 7.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Tenet Healthcare pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Universal Health Services's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Universal Health Services quarterly revenues are $4B, which are smaller than Tenet Healthcare quarterly revenues of $5.1B. Universal Health Services's net income of $258.7M is lower than Tenet Healthcare's net income of $472M. Notably, Universal Health Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.99x while Tenet Healthcare's PE ratio is 4.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Universal Health Services is 0.80x versus 0.62x for Tenet Healthcare. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.