SLG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Prologis has a net margin of 6.2% compared to SL Green Realty's net margin of 58.11%. SL Green Realty's return on equity of 0.72% beat Prologis's return on equity of 6.44%.

SL Green Realty has a consensus price target of $69.76, signalling upside risk potential of 22.93%. On the other hand Prologis has an analysts' consensus of $129.55 which suggests that it could grow by 15.87%. Given that SL Green Realty has higher upside potential than Prologis, analysts believe SL Green Realty is more attractive than Prologis.

SL Green Realty has a beta of 1.814, which suggesting that the stock is 81.357% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Prologis has a beta of 1.095, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.514%.

SL Green Realty has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.33%. Prologis offers a yield of 3.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.96 per share. SL Green Realty pays 713.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Prologis pays out 95.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Prologis's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but SL Green Realty's is not.

SL Green Realty quarterly revenues are $245.9M, which are smaller than Prologis quarterly revenues of $2.2B. SL Green Realty's net income of $15.3M is lower than Prologis's net income of $1.3B. Notably, SL Green Realty's price-to-earnings ratio is 709.38x while Prologis's PE ratio is 27.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SL Green Realty is 4.37x versus 13.01x for Prologis. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Regency Centers has a net margin of 6.2% compared to SL Green Realty's net margin of 23.21%. SL Green Realty's return on equity of 0.72% beat Regency Centers's return on equity of 5.69%.

SL Green Realty has a consensus price target of $69.76, signalling upside risk potential of 22.93%. On the other hand Regency Centers has an analysts' consensus of $79.68 which suggests that it could grow by 12.12%. Given that SL Green Realty has higher upside potential than Regency Centers, analysts believe SL Green Realty is more attractive than Regency Centers.

SL Green Realty has a beta of 1.814, which suggesting that the stock is 81.357% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Regency Centers has a beta of 1.230, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.02%.

SL Green Realty has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.33%. Regency Centers offers a yield of 3.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.71 per share. SL Green Realty pays 713.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Regency Centers pays out 125.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SL Green Realty quarterly revenues are $245.9M, which are smaller than Regency Centers quarterly revenues of $372.5M. SL Green Realty's net income of $15.3M is lower than Regency Centers's net income of $86.5M. Notably, SL Green Realty's price-to-earnings ratio is 709.38x while Regency Centers's PE ratio is 33.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SL Green Realty is 4.37x versus 8.95x for Regency Centers. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vornado Realty Trust has a net margin of 6.2% compared to SL Green Realty's net margin of 3.65%. SL Green Realty's return on equity of 0.72% beat Vornado Realty Trust's return on equity of 1.12%.

SL Green Realty has a consensus price target of $69.76, signalling upside risk potential of 22.93%. On the other hand Vornado Realty Trust has an analysts' consensus of $39.43 which suggests that it could grow by 7.09%. Given that SL Green Realty has higher upside potential than Vornado Realty Trust, analysts believe SL Green Realty is more attractive than Vornado Realty Trust.

SL Green Realty has a beta of 1.814, which suggesting that the stock is 81.357% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vornado Realty Trust has a beta of 1.600, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.97%.

SL Green Realty has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.33%. Vornado Realty Trust offers a yield of 2.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.74 per share. SL Green Realty pays 713.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Vornado Realty Trust pays out 288.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SL Green Realty quarterly revenues are $245.9M, which are smaller than Vornado Realty Trust quarterly revenues of $457.8M. SL Green Realty's net income of $15.3M is lower than Vornado Realty Trust's net income of $16.7M. Notably, SL Green Realty's price-to-earnings ratio is 709.38x while Vornado Realty Trust's PE ratio is 920.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SL Green Realty is 4.37x versus 3.99x for Vornado Realty Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Welltower has a net margin of 6.2% compared to SL Green Realty's net margin of 5.41%. SL Green Realty's return on equity of 0.72% beat Welltower's return on equity of 3.21%.

SL Green Realty has a consensus price target of $69.76, signalling upside risk potential of 22.93%. On the other hand Welltower has an analysts' consensus of $161.63 which suggests that it could grow by 8.3%. Given that SL Green Realty has higher upside potential than Welltower, analysts believe SL Green Realty is more attractive than Welltower.

SL Green Realty has a beta of 1.814, which suggesting that the stock is 81.357% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Welltower has a beta of 1.203, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.319%.

SL Green Realty has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.33%. Welltower offers a yield of 1.77% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share. SL Green Realty pays 713.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Welltower pays out 162.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SL Green Realty quarterly revenues are $245.9M, which are smaller than Welltower quarterly revenues of $2.2B. SL Green Realty's net income of $15.3M is lower than Welltower's net income of $120M. Notably, SL Green Realty's price-to-earnings ratio is 709.38x while Welltower's PE ratio is 94.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SL Green Realty is 4.37x versus 11.46x for Welltower. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.