ROK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Broadwind has a net margin of 11.75% compared to Rockwell Automation's net margin of 0.21%. Rockwell Automation's return on equity of 25.84% beat Broadwind's return on equity of 5.46%.

Rockwell Automation has a consensus price target of $296.27, signalling upside risk potential of 4.77%. On the other hand Broadwind has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 112.1%. Given that Broadwind has higher upside potential than Rockwell Automation, analysts believe Broadwind is more attractive than Rockwell Automation.

Rockwell Automation has a beta of 1.357, which suggesting that the stock is 35.749% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Broadwind has a beta of 1.439, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.872%.

Rockwell Automation has a quarterly dividend of $1.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.79%. Broadwind offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Rockwell Automation pays 59.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Broadwind pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rockwell Automation's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Rockwell Automation quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than Broadwind quarterly revenues of $35.5M. Rockwell Automation's net income of $239.1M is higher than Broadwind's net income of $74K. Notably, Rockwell Automation's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.15x while Broadwind's PE ratio is 15.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rockwell Automation is 3.92x versus 0.31x for Broadwind. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Crane has a net margin of 11.75% compared to Rockwell Automation's net margin of 12.94%. Rockwell Automation's return on equity of 25.84% beat Crane's return on equity of 18.51%.

Rockwell Automation has a consensus price target of $296.27, signalling upside risk potential of 4.77%. On the other hand Crane has an analysts' consensus of $170.00 which suggests that it could grow by 9.59%. Given that Crane has higher upside potential than Rockwell Automation, analysts believe Crane is more attractive than Rockwell Automation.

Rockwell Automation has a beta of 1.357, which suggesting that the stock is 35.749% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Crane has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Rockwell Automation has a quarterly dividend of $1.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.79%. Crane offers a yield of 0.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Rockwell Automation pays 59.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Crane pays out 22.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Rockwell Automation quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than Crane quarterly revenues of $597.2M. Rockwell Automation's net income of $239.1M is higher than Crane's net income of $77.3M. Notably, Rockwell Automation's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.15x while Crane's PE ratio is 34.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rockwell Automation is 3.92x versus 3.96x for Crane. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ocean Power Technologies has a net margin of 11.75% compared to Rockwell Automation's net margin of -161.83%. Rockwell Automation's return on equity of 25.84% beat Ocean Power Technologies's return on equity of -89.48%.

Rockwell Automation has a consensus price target of $296.27, signalling upside risk potential of 4.77%. On the other hand Ocean Power Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Rockwell Automation has higher upside potential than Ocean Power Technologies, analysts believe Rockwell Automation is more attractive than Ocean Power Technologies.

Rockwell Automation has a beta of 1.357, which suggesting that the stock is 35.749% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ocean Power Technologies has a beta of 2.632, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 163.201%.

Rockwell Automation has a quarterly dividend of $1.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.79%. Ocean Power Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Rockwell Automation pays 59.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Ocean Power Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rockwell Automation's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Rockwell Automation quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than Ocean Power Technologies quarterly revenues of $2.4M. Rockwell Automation's net income of $239.1M is higher than Ocean Power Technologies's net income of -$3.9M. Notably, Rockwell Automation's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.15x while Ocean Power Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rockwell Automation is 3.92x versus 12.10x for Ocean Power Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SIFCO Industries has a net margin of 11.75% compared to Rockwell Automation's net margin of -15.94%. Rockwell Automation's return on equity of 25.84% beat SIFCO Industries's return on equity of -15.79%.

Rockwell Automation has a consensus price target of $296.27, signalling upside risk potential of 4.77%. On the other hand SIFCO Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 236.65%. Given that SIFCO Industries has higher upside potential than Rockwell Automation, analysts believe SIFCO Industries is more attractive than Rockwell Automation.

Rockwell Automation has a beta of 1.357, which suggesting that the stock is 35.749% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SIFCO Industries has a beta of 1.185, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.531%.

Rockwell Automation has a quarterly dividend of $1.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.79%. SIFCO Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Rockwell Automation pays 59.95% of its earnings as a dividend. SIFCO Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rockwell Automation's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Rockwell Automation quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than SIFCO Industries quarterly revenues of $2.8M. Rockwell Automation's net income of $239.1M is higher than SIFCO Industries's net income of -$443K. Notably, Rockwell Automation's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.15x while SIFCO Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rockwell Automation is 3.92x versus 0.35x for SIFCO Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.