NKE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Deckers Outdoor has a net margin of 9.41% compared to Nike's net margin of 18.48%. Nike's return on equity of 34.51% beat Deckers Outdoor's return on equity of 42.48%.

Nike has a consensus price target of $86.60, signalling upside risk potential of 12.82%. On the other hand Deckers Outdoor has an analysts' consensus of $198.63 which suggests that it could fall by -4.34%. Given that Nike has higher upside potential than Deckers Outdoor, analysts believe Nike is more attractive than Deckers Outdoor.

Nike has a beta of 1.023, which suggesting that the stock is 2.318% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Deckers Outdoor has a beta of 1.084, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.394%.

Nike has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.97%. Deckers Outdoor offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nike pays 38.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Deckers Outdoor pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nike's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Nike quarterly revenues are $12.4B, which are larger than Deckers Outdoor quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Nike's net income of $1.2B is higher than Deckers Outdoor's net income of $242.3M. Notably, Nike's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.69x while Deckers Outdoor's PE ratio is 36.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nike is 2.36x versus 6.87x for Deckers Outdoor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Skechers USA has a net margin of 9.41% compared to Nike's net margin of 8.23%. Nike's return on equity of 34.51% beat Skechers USA's return on equity of 13.77%.

Nike has a consensus price target of $86.60, signalling upside risk potential of 12.82%. On the other hand Skechers USA has an analysts' consensus of $69.92 which suggests that it could grow by 21.79%. Given that Skechers USA has higher upside potential than Nike, analysts believe Skechers USA is more attractive than Nike.

Nike has a beta of 1.023, which suggesting that the stock is 2.318% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Skechers USA has a beta of 1.218, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.819%.

Nike has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.97%. Skechers USA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nike pays 38.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Skechers USA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nike's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Nike quarterly revenues are $12.4B, which are larger than Skechers USA quarterly revenues of $2.3B. Nike's net income of $1.2B is higher than Skechers USA's net income of $193.2M. Notably, Nike's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.69x while Skechers USA's PE ratio is 16.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nike is 2.36x versus 1.19x for Skechers USA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of 9.41% compared to Nike's net margin of 8.61%. Nike's return on equity of 34.51% beat Tesla's return on equity of 19.77%.

Nike has a consensus price target of $86.60, signalling upside risk potential of 12.82%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $283.88 which suggests that it could fall by -34.07%. Given that Nike has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe Nike is more attractive than Tesla.

Nike has a beta of 1.023, which suggesting that the stock is 2.318% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.361, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 136.098%.

Nike has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.97%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nike pays 38.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nike's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Nike quarterly revenues are $12.4B, which are smaller than Tesla quarterly revenues of $25.2B. Nike's net income of $1.2B is lower than Tesla's net income of $2.2B. Notably, Nike's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.69x while Tesla's PE ratio is 117.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nike is 2.36x versus 15.47x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wolverine World Wide has a net margin of 9.41% compared to Nike's net margin of 5.36%. Nike's return on equity of 34.51% beat Wolverine World Wide's return on equity of -22.79%.

Nike has a consensus price target of $86.60, signalling upside risk potential of 12.82%. On the other hand Wolverine World Wide has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 10.04%. Given that Nike has higher upside potential than Wolverine World Wide, analysts believe Nike is more attractive than Wolverine World Wide.

Nike has a beta of 1.023, which suggesting that the stock is 2.318% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wolverine World Wide has a beta of 1.888, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.844%.

Nike has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.97%. Wolverine World Wide offers a yield of 1.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Nike pays 38.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Wolverine World Wide pays out -82.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Nike's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Nike quarterly revenues are $12.4B, which are larger than Wolverine World Wide quarterly revenues of $440.2M. Nike's net income of $1.2B is higher than Wolverine World Wide's net income of $23.6M. Notably, Nike's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.69x while Wolverine World Wide's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nike is 2.36x versus 1.01x for Wolverine World Wide. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.