MSI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cisco Systems has a net margin of 20.29% compared to Motorola Solutions's net margin of 17.35%. Motorola Solutions's return on equity of 153.02% beat Cisco Systems's return on equity of 20.12%.

Motorola Solutions has a consensus price target of $518.00, signalling upside risk potential of 21.76%. On the other hand Cisco Systems has an analysts' consensus of $70.37 which suggests that it could grow by 16.31%. Given that Motorola Solutions has higher upside potential than Cisco Systems, analysts believe Motorola Solutions is more attractive than Cisco Systems.

Motorola Solutions has a beta of 1.035, which suggesting that the stock is 3.5% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cisco Systems has a beta of 0.789, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.103%.

Motorola Solutions has a quarterly dividend of $1.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.99%. Cisco Systems offers a yield of 2.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Motorola Solutions pays 41.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Cisco Systems pays out 61.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Motorola Solutions quarterly revenues are $3B, which are smaller than Cisco Systems quarterly revenues of $14B. Motorola Solutions's net income of $611M is lower than Cisco Systems's net income of $2.4B. Notably, Motorola Solutions's price-to-earnings ratio is 45.33x while Cisco Systems's PE ratio is 26.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Motorola Solutions is 6.56x versus 4.50x for Cisco Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Harmonic has a net margin of 20.29% compared to Motorola Solutions's net margin of 17.16%. Motorola Solutions's return on equity of 153.02% beat Harmonic's return on equity of 9.19%.

Motorola Solutions has a consensus price target of $518.00, signalling upside risk potential of 21.76%. On the other hand Harmonic has an analysts' consensus of $11.75 which suggests that it could grow by 13.09%. Given that Motorola Solutions has higher upside potential than Harmonic, analysts believe Motorola Solutions is more attractive than Harmonic.

Motorola Solutions has a beta of 1.035, which suggesting that the stock is 3.5% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Harmonic has a beta of 0.868, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.243%.

Motorola Solutions has a quarterly dividend of $1.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.99%. Harmonic offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Motorola Solutions pays 41.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Harmonic pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Motorola Solutions's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Motorola Solutions quarterly revenues are $3B, which are larger than Harmonic quarterly revenues of $222.2M. Motorola Solutions's net income of $611M is higher than Harmonic's net income of $38.1M. Notably, Motorola Solutions's price-to-earnings ratio is 45.33x while Harmonic's PE ratio is 31.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Motorola Solutions is 6.56x versus 1.77x for Harmonic. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Qualcomm has a net margin of 20.29% compared to Motorola Solutions's net margin of 27.25%. Motorola Solutions's return on equity of 153.02% beat Qualcomm's return on equity of 42.1%.

Motorola Solutions has a consensus price target of $518.00, signalling upside risk potential of 21.76%. On the other hand Qualcomm has an analysts' consensus of $198.50 which suggests that it could grow by 26.77%. Given that Qualcomm has higher upside potential than Motorola Solutions, analysts believe Qualcomm is more attractive than Motorola Solutions.

Motorola Solutions has a beta of 1.035, which suggesting that the stock is 3.5% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Qualcomm has a beta of 1.282, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.223%.

Motorola Solutions has a quarterly dividend of $1.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.99%. Qualcomm offers a yield of 2.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.85 per share. Motorola Solutions pays 41.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Qualcomm pays out 36.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Motorola Solutions quarterly revenues are $3B, which are smaller than Qualcomm quarterly revenues of $11.7B. Motorola Solutions's net income of $611M is lower than Qualcomm's net income of $3.2B. Notably, Motorola Solutions's price-to-earnings ratio is 45.33x while Qualcomm's PE ratio is 16.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Motorola Solutions is 6.56x versus 4.34x for Qualcomm. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ubiquiti has a net margin of 20.29% compared to Motorola Solutions's net margin of 22.8%. Motorola Solutions's return on equity of 153.02% beat Ubiquiti's return on equity of 381.02%.

Motorola Solutions has a consensus price target of $518.00, signalling upside risk potential of 21.76%. On the other hand Ubiquiti has an analysts' consensus of $331.00 which suggests that it could grow by 3.74%. Given that Motorola Solutions has higher upside potential than Ubiquiti, analysts believe Motorola Solutions is more attractive than Ubiquiti.

Motorola Solutions has a beta of 1.035, which suggesting that the stock is 3.5% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ubiquiti has a beta of 1.116, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.594%.

Motorola Solutions has a quarterly dividend of $1.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.99%. Ubiquiti offers a yield of 0.75% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share. Motorola Solutions pays 41.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Ubiquiti pays out 41.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Motorola Solutions quarterly revenues are $3B, which are larger than Ubiquiti quarterly revenues of $599.9M. Motorola Solutions's net income of $611M is higher than Ubiquiti's net income of $136.8M. Notably, Motorola Solutions's price-to-earnings ratio is 45.33x while Ubiquiti's PE ratio is 43.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Motorola Solutions is 6.56x versus 8.97x for Ubiquiti. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.