MKC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Flowers Foods has a net margin of 11.21% compared to McCormick &'s net margin of 5.46%. McCormick &'s return on equity of 14.38% beat Flowers Foods's return on equity of 17.46%.

McCormick & has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 8.67%. On the other hand Flowers Foods has an analysts' consensus of $24.00 which suggests that it could grow by 18.26%. Given that Flowers Foods has higher upside potential than McCormick &, analysts believe Flowers Foods is more attractive than McCormick &.

McCormick & has a beta of 0.755, which suggesting that the stock is 24.516% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flowers Foods has a beta of 0.369, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.112%.

McCormick & has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.15%. Flowers Foods offers a yield of 4.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. McCormick & pays 61.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Flowers Foods pays out 158.18% of its earnings as a dividend. McCormick &'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Flowers Foods's is not.

McCormick & quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are larger than Flowers Foods quarterly revenues of $1.2B. McCormick &'s net income of $184.2M is higher than Flowers Foods's net income of $65M. Notably, McCormick &'s price-to-earnings ratio is 26.57x while Flowers Foods's PE ratio is 17.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for McCormick & is 3.16x versus 0.85x for Flowers Foods. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ingredion has a net margin of 11.21% compared to McCormick &'s net margin of 10.05%. McCormick &'s return on equity of 14.38% beat Ingredion's return on equity of 18.21%.

McCormick & has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 8.67%. On the other hand Ingredion has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 15.12%. Given that Ingredion has higher upside potential than McCormick &, analysts believe Ingredion is more attractive than McCormick &.

McCormick & has a beta of 0.755, which suggesting that the stock is 24.516% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ingredion has a beta of 0.745, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.452%.

McCormick & has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.15%. Ingredion offers a yield of 2.26% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share. McCormick & pays 61.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Ingredion pays out 30.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

McCormick & quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are smaller than Ingredion quarterly revenues of $1.9B. McCormick &'s net income of $184.2M is lower than Ingredion's net income of $188M. Notably, McCormick &'s price-to-earnings ratio is 26.57x while Ingredion's PE ratio is 13.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for McCormick & is 3.16x versus 1.23x for Ingredion. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mondelez International has a net margin of 11.21% compared to McCormick &'s net margin of 9.27%. McCormick &'s return on equity of 14.38% beat Mondelez International's return on equity of 13.53%.

McCormick & has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 8.67%. On the other hand Mondelez International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 32.46%. Given that Mondelez International has higher upside potential than McCormick &, analysts believe Mondelez International is more attractive than McCormick &.

McCormick & has a beta of 0.755, which suggesting that the stock is 24.516% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mondelez International has a beta of 0.529, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.056%.

McCormick & has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.15%. Mondelez International offers a yield of 2.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. McCormick & pays 61.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Mondelez International pays out 43.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

McCormick & quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are smaller than Mondelez International quarterly revenues of $9.2B. McCormick &'s net income of $184.2M is lower than Mondelez International's net income of $853M. Notably, McCormick &'s price-to-earnings ratio is 26.57x while Mondelez International's PE ratio is 21.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for McCormick & is 3.16x versus 2.22x for Mondelez International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

United Natural Foods has a net margin of 11.21% compared to McCormick &'s net margin of -0.27%. McCormick &'s return on equity of 14.38% beat United Natural Foods's return on equity of -5.64%.

McCormick & has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 8.67%. On the other hand United Natural Foods has an analysts' consensus of $28.00 which suggests that it could grow by 9.16%. Given that United Natural Foods has higher upside potential than McCormick &, analysts believe United Natural Foods is more attractive than McCormick &.

McCormick & has a beta of 0.755, which suggesting that the stock is 24.516% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison United Natural Foods has a beta of 0.643, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.692%.

McCormick & has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.15%. United Natural Foods offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. McCormick & pays 61.49% of its earnings as a dividend. United Natural Foods pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. McCormick &'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

McCormick & quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are smaller than United Natural Foods quarterly revenues of $7.9B. McCormick &'s net income of $184.2M is higher than United Natural Foods's net income of -$21M. Notably, McCormick &'s price-to-earnings ratio is 26.57x while United Natural Foods's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for McCormick & is 3.16x versus 0.05x for United Natural Foods. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.