MA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Blackstone has a net margin of 44.63% compared to Mastercard's net margin of 26.04%. Mastercard's return on equity of 179.81% beat Blackstone's return on equity of 14.74%.

Mastercard has a consensus price target of $618.26, signalling upside risk potential of 12.8%. On the other hand Blackstone has an analysts' consensus of $182.35 which suggests that it could grow by 30.46%. Given that Blackstone has higher upside potential than Mastercard, analysts believe Blackstone is more attractive than Mastercard.

Mastercard has a beta of 1.064, which suggesting that the stock is 6.352% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Blackstone has a beta of 1.611, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.056%.

Mastercard has a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.64%. Blackstone offers a yield of 2.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.44 per share. Mastercard pays 19.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Blackstone pays out 159.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Mastercard's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Blackstone's is not.

Mastercard quarterly revenues are $7.5B, which are larger than Blackstone quarterly revenues of $2.7B. Mastercard's net income of $3.3B is higher than Blackstone's net income of $703.9M. Notably, Mastercard's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.46x while Blackstone's PE ratio is 38.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mastercard is 18.04x versus 9.80x for Blackstone. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PayPal Holdings has a net margin of 44.63% compared to Mastercard's net margin of 13.4%. Mastercard's return on equity of 179.81% beat PayPal Holdings's return on equity of 20.14%.

Mastercard has a consensus price target of $618.26, signalling upside risk potential of 12.8%. On the other hand PayPal Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $93.20 which suggests that it could grow by 43.45%. Given that PayPal Holdings has higher upside potential than Mastercard, analysts believe PayPal Holdings is more attractive than Mastercard.

Mastercard has a beta of 1.064, which suggesting that the stock is 6.352% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PayPal Holdings has a beta of 1.605, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.467%.

Mastercard has a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.64%. PayPal Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mastercard pays 19.02% of its earnings as a dividend. PayPal Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mastercard's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mastercard quarterly revenues are $7.5B, which are smaller than PayPal Holdings quarterly revenues of $8.4B. Mastercard's net income of $3.3B is higher than PayPal Holdings's net income of $1.1B. Notably, Mastercard's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.46x while PayPal Holdings's PE ratio is 16.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mastercard is 18.04x versus 2.13x for PayPal Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Visa has a net margin of 44.63% compared to Mastercard's net margin of 53.83%. Mastercard's return on equity of 179.81% beat Visa's return on equity of 50.59%.

Mastercard has a consensus price target of $618.26, signalling upside risk potential of 12.8%. On the other hand Visa has an analysts' consensus of $376.59 which suggests that it could grow by 7.46%. Given that Mastercard has higher upside potential than Visa, analysts believe Mastercard is more attractive than Visa.

Mastercard has a beta of 1.064, which suggesting that the stock is 6.352% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Visa has a beta of 0.944, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.642%.

Mastercard has a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.64%. Visa offers a yield of 0.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.59 per share. Mastercard pays 19.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Visa pays out 21.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mastercard quarterly revenues are $7.5B, which are smaller than Visa quarterly revenues of $9.5B. Mastercard's net income of $3.3B is lower than Visa's net income of $5.1B. Notably, Mastercard's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.46x while Visa's PE ratio is 35.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mastercard is 18.04x versus 19.18x for Visa. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wells Fargo & has a net margin of 44.63% compared to Mastercard's net margin of 24.92%. Mastercard's return on equity of 179.81% beat Wells Fargo &'s return on equity of 10.79%.

Mastercard has a consensus price target of $618.26, signalling upside risk potential of 12.8%. On the other hand Wells Fargo & has an analysts' consensus of $83.05 which suggests that it could grow by 15.75%. Given that Wells Fargo & has higher upside potential than Mastercard, analysts believe Wells Fargo & is more attractive than Mastercard.

Mastercard has a beta of 1.064, which suggesting that the stock is 6.352% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wells Fargo & has a beta of 1.020, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.021%.

Mastercard has a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.64%. Wells Fargo & offers a yield of 2.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Mastercard pays 19.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Wells Fargo & pays out 31.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mastercard quarterly revenues are $7.5B, which are smaller than Wells Fargo & quarterly revenues of $20.4B. Mastercard's net income of $3.3B is lower than Wells Fargo &'s net income of $5.1B. Notably, Mastercard's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.46x while Wells Fargo &'s PE ratio is 13.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mastercard is 18.04x versus 3.03x for Wells Fargo &. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.