GLW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Broadcom has a net margin of 8.86% compared to Corning's net margin of 36.89%. Corning's return on equity of 4.45% beat Broadcom's return on equity of 14.67%.

Corning has a consensus price target of $55.15, signalling upside risk potential of 17.69%. On the other hand Broadcom has an analysts' consensus of $250.42 which suggests that it could grow by 28.75%. Given that Broadcom has higher upside potential than Corning, analysts believe Broadcom is more attractive than Corning.

Corning has a beta of 1.029, which suggesting that the stock is 2.909% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Broadcom has a beta of 1.007, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.69399999999999%.

Corning has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.39%. Broadcom offers a yield of 1.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.59 per share. Corning pays 194.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Broadcom pays out 166.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Corning quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are smaller than Broadcom quarterly revenues of $14.9B. Corning's net income of $310M is lower than Broadcom's net income of $5.5B. Notably, Corning's price-to-earnings ratio is 80.79x while Broadcom's PE ratio is 93.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Corning is 3.08x versus 17.05x for Broadcom. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Intel has a net margin of 8.86% compared to Corning's net margin of -0.88%. Corning's return on equity of 4.45% beat Intel's return on equity of -17.02%.

Corning has a consensus price target of $55.15, signalling upside risk potential of 17.69%. On the other hand Intel has an analysts' consensus of $22.90 which suggests that it could fall by -10.87%. Given that Corning has higher upside potential than Intel, analysts believe Corning is more attractive than Intel.

Corning has a beta of 1.029, which suggesting that the stock is 2.909% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intel has a beta of 1.027, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.678%.

Corning has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.39%. Intel offers a yield of 1.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Corning pays 194.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Intel pays out -8.53% of its earnings as a dividend.

Corning quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are smaller than Intel quarterly revenues of $14.3B. Corning's net income of $310M is higher than Intel's net income of -$126M. Notably, Corning's price-to-earnings ratio is 80.79x while Intel's PE ratio is 95.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Corning is 3.08x versus 2.07x for Intel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

M-Tron Industries has a net margin of 8.86% compared to Corning's net margin of --. Corning's return on equity of 4.45% beat M-Tron Industries's return on equity of --.

Corning has a consensus price target of $55.15, signalling upside risk potential of 17.69%. On the other hand M-Tron Industries has an analysts' consensus of $70.00 which suggests that it could grow by 73.14%. Given that M-Tron Industries has higher upside potential than Corning, analysts believe M-Tron Industries is more attractive than Corning.

Corning has a beta of 1.029, which suggesting that the stock is 2.909% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison M-Tron Industries has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Corning has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.39%. M-Tron Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Corning pays 194.86% of its earnings as a dividend. M-Tron Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Corning quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are larger than M-Tron Industries quarterly revenues of --. Corning's net income of $310M is higher than M-Tron Industries's net income of --. Notably, Corning's price-to-earnings ratio is 80.79x while M-Tron Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Corning is 3.08x versus 7.95x for M-Tron Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vicor has a net margin of 8.86% compared to Corning's net margin of 10.66%. Corning's return on equity of 4.45% beat Vicor's return on equity of 1.12%.

Corning has a consensus price target of $55.15, signalling upside risk potential of 17.69%. On the other hand Vicor has an analysts' consensus of $60.00 which suggests that it could grow by 8.09%. Given that Corning has higher upside potential than Vicor, analysts believe Corning is more attractive than Vicor.

Corning has a beta of 1.029, which suggesting that the stock is 2.909% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vicor has a beta of 1.454, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.432%.

Corning has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.39%. Vicor offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Corning pays 194.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Vicor pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Corning quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are larger than Vicor quarterly revenues of $96.2M. Corning's net income of $310M is higher than Vicor's net income of $10.2M. Notably, Corning's price-to-earnings ratio is 80.79x while Vicor's PE ratio is 427.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Corning is 3.08x versus 6.99x for Vicor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.