Financhill
Sell
35

EMN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$87.23
Seasonality move :
3.03%
Day range:
$86.70 - $88.31
52-week range:
$80.71 - $114.50
Dividend yield:
3.74%
P/E ratio:
11.68x
P/S ratio:
1.11x
P/B ratio:
1.79x
Volume:
1.2M
Avg. volume:
1.1M
1-year change:
-0.58%
Market cap:
$10.1B
Revenue:
$9.2B
EPS (TTM):
$7.47

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
EMN
Eastman Chemical
$2.3B $1.59 3.35% -38.24% $115.11
CLF
Cleveland-Cliffs
$4.5B -$0.48 -12.56% -55.91% $13.45
FRD
Friedman Industries
-- -- -- -- --
NUE
Nucor
$6.8B $0.64 -12.12% -79.83% $159.55
PZG
Paramount Gold Nevada
-- -$0.03 -- -- --
XPL
Solitario Resources
-- -$0.02 -- -- $1.50
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
EMN
Eastman Chemical
$87.24 $115.11 $10.1B 11.68x $0.83 3.74% 1.11x
CLF
Cleveland-Cliffs
$9.90 $13.45 $4.9B 175.97x $0.00 0% 0.24x
FRD
Friedman Industries
$14.86 -- $103.5M 13.04x $0.04 0.94% 0.22x
NUE
Nucor
$118.16 $159.55 $27.7B 11.42x $0.55 1.84% 0.91x
PZG
Paramount Gold Nevada
$0.38 -- $24.9M -- $0.00 0% --
XPL
Solitario Resources
$0.60 $1.50 $49.2M -- $0.00 0% --
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
EMN
Eastman Chemical
47.2% 1.502 38.73% 0.75x
CLF
Cleveland-Cliffs
35.51% 2.347 60.69% 0.50x
FRD
Friedman Industries
21.78% 0.211 32.37% 1.16x
NUE
Nucor
25.31% 2.318 19.07% 1.50x
PZG
Paramount Gold Nevada
-- 0.990 -- --
XPL
Solitario Resources
-- -1.136 -- --
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
EMN
Eastman Chemical
$605M $357M 8.31% 15.81% 13.52% $275M
CLF
Cleveland-Cliffs
-$104M -$243M -4.14% -6.03% -4.47% -$235M
FRD
Friedman Industries
$10.1M -$2K 4.68% 6.32% -0.03% $8.9M
NUE
Nucor
$757.9M $513.3M 8.85% 11.62% 6.09% $478.1M
PZG
Paramount Gold Nevada
-$166.6K -$1.4M -- -- -- -$1.2M
XPL
Solitario Resources
-$8K -$2.5M -- -- -- -$1.8M

Eastman Chemical vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns EMN or CLF?

    Cleveland-Cliffs has a net margin of 7.31% compared to Eastman Chemical's net margin of -5.3%. Eastman Chemical's return on equity of 15.81% beat Cleveland-Cliffs's return on equity of -6.03%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    EMN
    Eastman Chemical
    24.55% $1.53 $10.8B
    CLF
    Cleveland-Cliffs
    -2.28% -$0.52 $10.9B
  • What do Analysts Say About EMN or CLF?

    Eastman Chemical has a consensus price target of $115.11, signalling upside risk potential of 31.94%. On the other hand Cleveland-Cliffs has an analysts' consensus of $13.45 which suggests that it could grow by 35.87%. Given that Cleveland-Cliffs has higher upside potential than Eastman Chemical, analysts believe Cleveland-Cliffs is more attractive than Eastman Chemical.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    EMN
    Eastman Chemical
    6 11 0
    CLF
    Cleveland-Cliffs
    3 6 1
  • Is EMN or CLF More Risky?

    Eastman Chemical has a beta of 1.442, which suggesting that the stock is 44.185% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 1.971, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 97.089%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock EMN or CLF?

    Eastman Chemical has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.74%. Cleveland-Cliffs offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Eastman Chemical pays 42.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Cleveland-Cliffs pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Eastman Chemical's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios EMN or CLF?

    Eastman Chemical quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are smaller than Cleveland-Cliffs quarterly revenues of $4.6B. Eastman Chemical's net income of $180M is higher than Cleveland-Cliffs's net income of -$242M. Notably, Eastman Chemical's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.68x while Cleveland-Cliffs's PE ratio is 175.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Eastman Chemical is 1.11x versus 0.24x for Cleveland-Cliffs. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    EMN
    Eastman Chemical
    1.11x 11.68x $2.5B $180M
    CLF
    Cleveland-Cliffs
    0.24x 175.97x $4.6B -$242M
  • Which has Higher Returns EMN or FRD?

    Friedman Industries has a net margin of 7.31% compared to Eastman Chemical's net margin of -0.63%. Eastman Chemical's return on equity of 15.81% beat Friedman Industries's return on equity of 6.32%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    EMN
    Eastman Chemical
    24.55% $1.53 $10.8B
    FRD
    Friedman Industries
    9.5% -$0.10 $164.6M
  • What do Analysts Say About EMN or FRD?

    Eastman Chemical has a consensus price target of $115.11, signalling upside risk potential of 31.94%. On the other hand Friedman Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Eastman Chemical has higher upside potential than Friedman Industries, analysts believe Eastman Chemical is more attractive than Friedman Industries.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    EMN
    Eastman Chemical
    6 11 0
    FRD
    Friedman Industries
    0 0 0
  • Is EMN or FRD More Risky?

    Eastman Chemical has a beta of 1.442, which suggesting that the stock is 44.185% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Friedman Industries has a beta of 1.411, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.118%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock EMN or FRD?

    Eastman Chemical has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.74%. Friedman Industries offers a yield of 0.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Eastman Chemical pays 42.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Friedman Industries pays out 3.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios EMN or FRD?

    Eastman Chemical quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than Friedman Industries quarterly revenues of $106.8M. Eastman Chemical's net income of $180M is higher than Friedman Industries's net income of -$675K. Notably, Eastman Chemical's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.68x while Friedman Industries's PE ratio is 13.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Eastman Chemical is 1.11x versus 0.22x for Friedman Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    EMN
    Eastman Chemical
    1.11x 11.68x $2.5B $180M
    FRD
    Friedman Industries
    0.22x 13.04x $106.8M -$675K
  • Which has Higher Returns EMN or NUE?

    Nucor has a net margin of 7.31% compared to Eastman Chemical's net margin of 3.36%. Eastman Chemical's return on equity of 15.81% beat Nucor's return on equity of 11.62%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    EMN
    Eastman Chemical
    24.55% $1.53 $10.8B
    NUE
    Nucor
    10.18% $1.05 $28.5B
  • What do Analysts Say About EMN or NUE?

    Eastman Chemical has a consensus price target of $115.11, signalling upside risk potential of 31.94%. On the other hand Nucor has an analysts' consensus of $159.55 which suggests that it could grow by 35.03%. Given that Nucor has higher upside potential than Eastman Chemical, analysts believe Nucor is more attractive than Eastman Chemical.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    EMN
    Eastman Chemical
    6 11 0
    NUE
    Nucor
    4 7 0
  • Is EMN or NUE More Risky?

    Eastman Chemical has a beta of 1.442, which suggesting that the stock is 44.185% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nucor has a beta of 1.604, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.425%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock EMN or NUE?

    Eastman Chemical has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.74%. Nucor offers a yield of 1.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share. Eastman Chemical pays 42.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Nucor pays out 11.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios EMN or NUE?

    Eastman Chemical quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are smaller than Nucor quarterly revenues of $7.4B. Eastman Chemical's net income of $180M is lower than Nucor's net income of $249.9M. Notably, Eastman Chemical's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.68x while Nucor's PE ratio is 11.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Eastman Chemical is 1.11x versus 0.91x for Nucor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    EMN
    Eastman Chemical
    1.11x 11.68x $2.5B $180M
    NUE
    Nucor
    0.91x 11.42x $7.4B $249.9M
  • Which has Higher Returns EMN or PZG?

    Paramount Gold Nevada has a net margin of 7.31% compared to Eastman Chemical's net margin of --. Eastman Chemical's return on equity of 15.81% beat Paramount Gold Nevada's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    EMN
    Eastman Chemical
    24.55% $1.53 $10.8B
    PZG
    Paramount Gold Nevada
    -- -$0.02 --
  • What do Analysts Say About EMN or PZG?

    Eastman Chemical has a consensus price target of $115.11, signalling upside risk potential of 31.94%. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 219.15%. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada has higher upside potential than Eastman Chemical, analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada is more attractive than Eastman Chemical.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    EMN
    Eastman Chemical
    6 11 0
    PZG
    Paramount Gold Nevada
    0 0 0
  • Is EMN or PZG More Risky?

    Eastman Chemical has a beta of 1.442, which suggesting that the stock is 44.185% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada has a beta of 1.881, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.144%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock EMN or PZG?

    Eastman Chemical has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.74%. Paramount Gold Nevada offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Eastman Chemical pays 42.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Eastman Chemical's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios EMN or PZG?

    Eastman Chemical quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada quarterly revenues of --. Eastman Chemical's net income of $180M is higher than Paramount Gold Nevada's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, Eastman Chemical's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.68x while Paramount Gold Nevada's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Eastman Chemical is 1.11x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    EMN
    Eastman Chemical
    1.11x 11.68x $2.5B $180M
    PZG
    Paramount Gold Nevada
    -- -- -- -$1.6M
  • Which has Higher Returns EMN or XPL?

    Solitario Resources has a net margin of 7.31% compared to Eastman Chemical's net margin of --. Eastman Chemical's return on equity of 15.81% beat Solitario Resources's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    EMN
    Eastman Chemical
    24.55% $1.53 $10.8B
    XPL
    Solitario Resources
    -- -$0.03 --
  • What do Analysts Say About EMN or XPL?

    Eastman Chemical has a consensus price target of $115.11, signalling upside risk potential of 31.94%. On the other hand Solitario Resources has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 148.26%. Given that Solitario Resources has higher upside potential than Eastman Chemical, analysts believe Solitario Resources is more attractive than Eastman Chemical.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    EMN
    Eastman Chemical
    6 11 0
    XPL
    Solitario Resources
    0 0 0
  • Is EMN or XPL More Risky?

    Eastman Chemical has a beta of 1.442, which suggesting that the stock is 44.185% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solitario Resources has a beta of 0.890, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.984%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock EMN or XPL?

    Eastman Chemical has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.74%. Solitario Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Eastman Chemical pays 42.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Solitario Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Eastman Chemical's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios EMN or XPL?

    Eastman Chemical quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than Solitario Resources quarterly revenues of --. Eastman Chemical's net income of $180M is higher than Solitario Resources's net income of -$2.3M. Notably, Eastman Chemical's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.68x while Solitario Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Eastman Chemical is 1.11x versus -- for Solitario Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    EMN
    Eastman Chemical
    1.11x 11.68x $2.5B $180M
    XPL
    Solitario Resources
    -- -- -- -$2.3M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

4 Top Dividend Stocks to Buy Now
4 Top Dividend Stocks to Buy Now

If you’re looking for steady income, dividend stocks are a…

Will Uber Stock Recover?
Will Uber Stock Recover?

Shares of Uber Technologies (NYSE:UBER) have had a rough few…

Is ARK Next Generation Internet ETF a Good Investment?
Is ARK Next Generation Internet ETF a Good Investment?

The ARK Next Generation Internet ETF looks like a pretty…

Stock Ideas

Sell
48
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.6T
P/E Ratio: 39x

Sell
47
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 114x

Sell
39
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 36x

Alerts

Buy
87
CEG alert for Jan 11

Constellation Energy [CEG] is up 25.15% over the past day.

Sell
1
MCY alert for Jan 11

Mercury General [MCY] is down 19.87% over the past day.

Buy
84
ATZAF alert for Jan 11

Aritzia [ATZAF] is up 17.63% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock