CMS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CenterPoint Energy has a net margin of 13.32% compared to CMS Energy's net margin of 10.96%. CMS Energy's return on equity of 11.78% beat CenterPoint Energy's return on equity of 9.95%.

CMS Energy has a consensus price target of $73.80, signalling upside risk potential of 5.15%. On the other hand CenterPoint Energy has an analysts' consensus of $35.64 which suggests that it could grow by 0.27%. Given that CMS Energy has higher upside potential than CenterPoint Energy, analysts believe CMS Energy is more attractive than CenterPoint Energy.

CMS Energy has a beta of 0.350, which suggesting that the stock is 64.981% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CenterPoint Energy has a beta of 0.647, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.326%.

CMS Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.54 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.97%. CenterPoint Energy offers a yield of 2.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. CMS Energy pays 62.41% of its earnings as a dividend. CenterPoint Energy pays out 51.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CMS Energy quarterly revenues are $2B, which are smaller than CenterPoint Energy quarterly revenues of $2.3B. CMS Energy's net income of $265M is higher than CenterPoint Energy's net income of $248M. Notably, CMS Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.14x while CenterPoint Energy's PE ratio is 22.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CMS Energy is 2.79x versus 2.65x for CenterPoint Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NextEra Energy has a net margin of 13.32% compared to CMS Energy's net margin of 22.34%. CMS Energy's return on equity of 11.78% beat NextEra Energy's return on equity of 11.64%.

CMS Energy has a consensus price target of $73.80, signalling upside risk potential of 5.15%. On the other hand NextEra Energy has an analysts' consensus of $84.51 which suggests that it could grow by 31.82%. Given that NextEra Energy has higher upside potential than CMS Energy, analysts believe NextEra Energy is more attractive than CMS Energy.

CMS Energy has a beta of 0.350, which suggesting that the stock is 64.981% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NextEra Energy has a beta of 0.585, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.514%.

CMS Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.54 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.97%. NextEra Energy offers a yield of 3.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share. CMS Energy pays 62.41% of its earnings as a dividend. NextEra Energy pays out 60.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CMS Energy quarterly revenues are $2B, which are smaller than NextEra Energy quarterly revenues of $5.4B. CMS Energy's net income of $265M is lower than NextEra Energy's net income of $1.2B. Notably, CMS Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.14x while NextEra Energy's PE ratio is 19.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CMS Energy is 2.79x versus 5.33x for NextEra Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NiSource has a net margin of 13.32% compared to CMS Energy's net margin of 14.1%. CMS Energy's return on equity of 11.78% beat NiSource's return on equity of 7.49%.

CMS Energy has a consensus price target of $73.80, signalling upside risk potential of 5.15%. On the other hand NiSource has an analysts' consensus of $41.77 which suggests that it could grow by 12.55%. Given that NiSource has higher upside potential than CMS Energy, analysts believe NiSource is more attractive than CMS Energy.

CMS Energy has a beta of 0.350, which suggesting that the stock is 64.981% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NiSource has a beta of 0.483, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.669%.

CMS Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.54 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.97%. NiSource offers a yield of 2.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. CMS Energy pays 62.41% of its earnings as a dividend. NiSource pays out 64.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CMS Energy quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than NiSource quarterly revenues of $1.6B. CMS Energy's net income of $265M is higher than NiSource's net income of $223.9M. Notably, CMS Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.14x while NiSource's PE ratio is 22.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CMS Energy is 2.79x versus 3.10x for NiSource. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WEC Energy Group has a net margin of 13.32% compared to CMS Energy's net margin of 19.87%. CMS Energy's return on equity of 11.78% beat WEC Energy Group's return on equity of 12.31%.

CMS Energy has a consensus price target of $73.80, signalling upside risk potential of 5.15%. On the other hand WEC Energy Group has an analysts' consensus of $104.39 which suggests that it could grow by 1.4%. Given that CMS Energy has higher upside potential than WEC Energy Group, analysts believe CMS Energy is more attractive than WEC Energy Group.

CMS Energy has a beta of 0.350, which suggesting that the stock is 64.981% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WEC Energy Group has a beta of 0.440, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.04%.

CMS Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.54 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.97%. WEC Energy Group offers a yield of 3.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.89 per share. CMS Energy pays 62.41% of its earnings as a dividend. WEC Energy Group pays out 69.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CMS Energy quarterly revenues are $2B, which are smaller than WEC Energy Group quarterly revenues of $2.3B. CMS Energy's net income of $265M is lower than WEC Energy Group's net income of $453.8M. Notably, CMS Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.14x while WEC Energy Group's PE ratio is 21.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CMS Energy is 2.79x versus 3.79x for WEC Energy Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.