VLEEY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hermes International SA has a net margin of -- compared to Valeo SA's net margin of --. Valeo SA's return on equity of 5.51% beat Hermes International SA's return on equity of 30.37%.

Valeo SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 59.39%. On the other hand Hermes International SA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Valeo SA has higher upside potential than Hermes International SA, analysts believe Valeo SA is more attractive than Hermes International SA.

Valeo SA has a beta of 1.666, which suggesting that the stock is 66.632% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hermes International SA has a beta of 1.079, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.922%.

Valeo SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.71%. Hermes International SA offers a yield of 0.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.32 per share. Valeo SA pays 41.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Hermes International SA pays out 32.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Valeo SA quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Hermes International SA quarterly revenues of --. Valeo SA's net income of -- is lower than Hermes International SA's net income of --. Notably, Valeo SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.59x while Hermes International SA's PE ratio is 52.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Valeo SA is 0.10x versus 16.52x for Hermes International SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lvmh Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE has a net margin of -- compared to Valeo SA's net margin of --. Valeo SA's return on equity of 5.51% beat Lvmh Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE's return on equity of 21.98%.

Valeo SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 59.39%. On the other hand Lvmh Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 9.66%. Given that Valeo SA has higher upside potential than Lvmh Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE, analysts believe Valeo SA is more attractive than Lvmh Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE.

Valeo SA has a beta of 1.666, which suggesting that the stock is 66.632% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lvmh Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE has a beta of 1.101, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.085%.

Valeo SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.71%. Lvmh Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE offers a yield of 2.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.16 per share. Valeo SA pays 41.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Lvmh Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE pays out 41.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Valeo SA quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Lvmh Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE quarterly revenues of --. Valeo SA's net income of -- is lower than Lvmh Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE's net income of --. Notably, Valeo SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.59x while Lvmh Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE's PE ratio is 22.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Valeo SA is 0.10x versus 3.59x for Lvmh Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Michelin has a net margin of -- compared to Valeo SA's net margin of --. Valeo SA's return on equity of 5.51% beat Michelin's return on equity of 10.73%.

Valeo SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 59.39%. On the other hand Michelin has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Valeo SA has higher upside potential than Michelin, analysts believe Valeo SA is more attractive than Michelin.

Valeo SA has a beta of 1.666, which suggesting that the stock is 66.632% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Michelin has a beta of 1.082, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.196%.

Valeo SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.71%. Michelin offers a yield of 4.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.73 per share. Valeo SA pays 41.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Michelin pays out 45.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Valeo SA quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Michelin quarterly revenues of --. Valeo SA's net income of -- is lower than Michelin's net income of --. Notably, Valeo SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.59x while Michelin's PE ratio is 11.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Valeo SA is 0.10x versus 0.80x for Michelin. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kering SA has a net margin of -- compared to Valeo SA's net margin of --. Valeo SA's return on equity of 5.51% beat Kering SA's return on equity of 13.08%.

Valeo SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 59.39%. On the other hand Kering SA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Valeo SA has higher upside potential than Kering SA, analysts believe Valeo SA is more attractive than Kering SA.

Valeo SA has a beta of 1.666, which suggesting that the stock is 66.632% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kering SA has a beta of 1.188, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.81%.

Valeo SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.71%. Kering SA offers a yield of 6.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.02 per share. Valeo SA pays 41.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Kering SA pays out 57.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Valeo SA quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Kering SA quarterly revenues of --. Valeo SA's net income of -- is lower than Kering SA's net income of --. Notably, Valeo SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.59x while Kering SA's PE ratio is 13.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Valeo SA is 0.10x versus 1.52x for Kering SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.