SNPMF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

PetroChina has a net margin of 1.02% compared to China Petroleum & Chemical's net margin of 6.25%. China Petroleum & Chemical's return on equity of 6.14% beat PetroChina's return on equity of 9.77%.

China Petroleum & Chemical has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand PetroChina has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Petroleum & Chemical has higher upside potential than PetroChina, analysts believe China Petroleum & Chemical is more attractive than PetroChina.

China Petroleum & Chemical has a beta of 0.410, which suggesting that the stock is 59.029% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PetroChina has a beta of 0.498, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.25%.

China Petroleum & Chemical has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.78%. PetroChina offers a yield of 9.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. China Petroleum & Chemical pays 86.04% of its earnings as a dividend. PetroChina pays out 57.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

China Petroleum & Chemical quarterly revenues are $110.4B, which are larger than PetroChina quarterly revenues of $98.1B. China Petroleum & Chemical's net income of $1.1B is lower than PetroChina's net income of $6.1B. Notably, China Petroleum & Chemical's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.30x while PetroChina's PE ratio is 5.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Petroleum & Chemical is 0.14x versus 0.30x for PetroChina. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Recon Technology has a net margin of 1.02% compared to China Petroleum & Chemical's net margin of --. China Petroleum & Chemical's return on equity of 6.14% beat Recon Technology's return on equity of -11.14%.

China Petroleum & Chemical has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Recon Technology has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Petroleum & Chemical has higher upside potential than Recon Technology, analysts believe China Petroleum & Chemical is more attractive than Recon Technology.

China Petroleum & Chemical has a beta of 0.410, which suggesting that the stock is 59.029% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Recon Technology has a beta of 2.606, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 160.589%.

China Petroleum & Chemical has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.78%. Recon Technology offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Petroleum & Chemical pays 86.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Recon Technology pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Petroleum & Chemical's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

China Petroleum & Chemical quarterly revenues are $110.4B, which are larger than Recon Technology quarterly revenues of --. China Petroleum & Chemical's net income of $1.1B is higher than Recon Technology's net income of --. Notably, China Petroleum & Chemical's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.30x while Recon Technology's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Petroleum & Chemical is 0.14x versus 1.98x for Recon Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sinopec Oilfield Service has a net margin of 1.02% compared to China Petroleum & Chemical's net margin of -0.17%. China Petroleum & Chemical's return on equity of 6.14% beat Sinopec Oilfield Service's return on equity of 7.36%.

China Petroleum & Chemical has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sinopec Oilfield Service has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Petroleum & Chemical has higher upside potential than Sinopec Oilfield Service, analysts believe China Petroleum & Chemical is more attractive than Sinopec Oilfield Service.

China Petroleum & Chemical has a beta of 0.410, which suggesting that the stock is 59.029% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sinopec Oilfield Service has a beta of 0.434, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.598%.

China Petroleum & Chemical has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.78%. Sinopec Oilfield Service offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Petroleum & Chemical pays 86.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Sinopec Oilfield Service pays out 106.56% of its earnings as a dividend. China Petroleum & Chemical's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Sinopec Oilfield Service's is not.

China Petroleum & Chemical quarterly revenues are $110.4B, which are larger than Sinopec Oilfield Service quarterly revenues of $3.6B. China Petroleum & Chemical's net income of $1.1B is higher than Sinopec Oilfield Service's net income of -$6.2M. Notably, China Petroleum & Chemical's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.30x while Sinopec Oilfield Service's PE ratio is 14.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Petroleum & Chemical is 0.14x versus -- for Sinopec Oilfield Service. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.