SNBH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Grove Collaborative Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to Sentient Brands Holdings's net margin of -25.53%. Sentient Brands Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Grove Collaborative Holdings's return on equity of -154.22%.

Sentient Brands Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Grove Collaborative Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $2.50 which suggests that it could grow by 119.3%. Given that Grove Collaborative Holdings has higher upside potential than Sentient Brands Holdings, analysts believe Grove Collaborative Holdings is more attractive than Sentient Brands Holdings.

Sentient Brands Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Grove Collaborative Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Sentient Brands Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Grove Collaborative Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sentient Brands Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Grove Collaborative Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sentient Brands Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Grove Collaborative Holdings quarterly revenues of $49.5M. Sentient Brands Holdings's net income of -$291.8K is higher than Grove Collaborative Holdings's net income of -$12.6M. Notably, Sentient Brands Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Grove Collaborative Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sentient Brands Holdings is -- versus 0.21x for Grove Collaborative Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hims & Hers Health has a net margin of -- compared to Sentient Brands Holdings's net margin of 5.41%. Sentient Brands Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Hims & Hers Health's return on equity of 32.03%.

Sentient Brands Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Hims & Hers Health has an analysts' consensus of $44.16 which suggests that it could grow by 69.2%. Given that Hims & Hers Health has higher upside potential than Sentient Brands Holdings, analysts believe Hims & Hers Health is more attractive than Sentient Brands Holdings.

Sentient Brands Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hims & Hers Health has a beta of 1.654, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.449%.

Sentient Brands Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hims & Hers Health offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sentient Brands Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hims & Hers Health pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sentient Brands Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Hims & Hers Health quarterly revenues of $481.1M. Sentient Brands Holdings's net income of -$291.8K is lower than Hims & Hers Health's net income of $26M. Notably, Sentient Brands Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hims & Hers Health's PE ratio is 48.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sentient Brands Holdings is -- versus 4.19x for Hims & Hers Health. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kenvue has a net margin of -- compared to Sentient Brands Holdings's net margin of 8%. Sentient Brands Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Kenvue's return on equity of 9.84%.

Sentient Brands Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kenvue has an analysts' consensus of $24.25 which suggests that it could grow by 12.86%. Given that Kenvue has higher upside potential than Sentient Brands Holdings, analysts believe Kenvue is more attractive than Sentient Brands Holdings.

Sentient Brands Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kenvue has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Sentient Brands Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kenvue offers a yield of 3.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Sentient Brands Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kenvue pays out 150.68% of its earnings as a dividend.

Sentient Brands Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Kenvue quarterly revenues of $3.7B. Sentient Brands Holdings's net income of -$291.8K is lower than Kenvue's net income of $293M. Notably, Sentient Brands Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Kenvue's PE ratio is 40.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sentient Brands Holdings is -- versus 2.67x for Kenvue. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Beauty Health has a net margin of -- compared to Sentient Brands Holdings's net margin of -12.37%. Sentient Brands Holdings's return on equity of -- beat The Beauty Health's return on equity of -47.95%.

Sentient Brands Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand The Beauty Health has an analysts' consensus of $1.58 which suggests that it could grow by 50.72%. Given that The Beauty Health has higher upside potential than Sentient Brands Holdings, analysts believe The Beauty Health is more attractive than Sentient Brands Holdings.

Sentient Brands Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Beauty Health has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Sentient Brands Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The Beauty Health offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sentient Brands Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Beauty Health pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sentient Brands Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than The Beauty Health quarterly revenues of $83.5M. Sentient Brands Holdings's net income of -$291.8K is higher than The Beauty Health's net income of -$10.3M. Notably, Sentient Brands Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while The Beauty Health's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sentient Brands Holdings is -- versus 0.43x for The Beauty Health. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.