PTAM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CRA International has a net margin of -- compared to Potash America's net margin of 8.49%. Potash America's return on equity of -- beat CRA International's return on equity of 22.6%.

Potash America has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CRA International has an analysts' consensus of $235.50 which suggests that it could grow by 42.67%. Given that CRA International has higher upside potential than Potash America, analysts believe CRA International is more attractive than Potash America.

Potash America has a beta of 0.256, which suggesting that the stock is 74.422% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CRA International has a beta of 0.962, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.831%.

Potash America has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CRA International offers a yield of 1.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share. Potash America pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CRA International pays out 26.37% of its earnings as a dividend. CRA International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Potash America quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CRA International quarterly revenues of $176.4M. Potash America's net income of -- is lower than CRA International's net income of $15M. Notably, Potash America's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CRA International's PE ratio is 24.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Potash America is -- versus 1.66x for CRA International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

DLH Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to Potash America's net margin of 1.23%. Potash America's return on equity of -- beat DLH Holdings's return on equity of 5.87%.

Potash America has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand DLH Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $15.00 which suggests that it could grow by 329.8%. Given that DLH Holdings has higher upside potential than Potash America, analysts believe DLH Holdings is more attractive than Potash America.

Potash America has a beta of 0.256, which suggesting that the stock is 74.422% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DLH Holdings has a beta of 1.465, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.471%.

Potash America has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. DLH Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Potash America pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. DLH Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Potash America quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than DLH Holdings quarterly revenues of $90.8M. Potash America's net income of -- is lower than DLH Holdings's net income of $1.1M. Notably, Potash America's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while DLH Holdings's PE ratio is 7.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Potash America is -- versus 0.13x for DLH Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Fuego Enterprises has a net margin of -- compared to Potash America's net margin of --. Potash America's return on equity of -- beat Fuego Enterprises's return on equity of --.

Potash America has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Fuego Enterprises has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Potash America has higher upside potential than Fuego Enterprises, analysts believe Potash America is more attractive than Fuego Enterprises.

Potash America has a beta of 0.256, which suggesting that the stock is 74.422% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fuego Enterprises has a beta of 2.907, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 190.73%.

Potash America has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Fuego Enterprises offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Potash America pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fuego Enterprises pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Potash America quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Fuego Enterprises quarterly revenues of --. Potash America's net income of -- is lower than Fuego Enterprises's net income of --. Notably, Potash America's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Fuego Enterprises's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Potash America is -- versus -- for Fuego Enterprises. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

VizConnect has a net margin of -- compared to Potash America's net margin of --. Potash America's return on equity of -- beat VizConnect's return on equity of --.

Potash America has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand VizConnect has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Potash America has higher upside potential than VizConnect, analysts believe Potash America is more attractive than VizConnect.

Potash America has a beta of 0.256, which suggesting that the stock is 74.422% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VizConnect has a beta of 30.123, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2912.289%.

Potash America has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. VizConnect offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Potash America pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VizConnect pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Potash America quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than VizConnect quarterly revenues of --. Potash America's net income of -- is lower than VizConnect's net income of --. Notably, Potash America's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while VizConnect's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Potash America is -- versus 0.00x for VizConnect. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.