OWUV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Blink Charging has a net margin of -- compared to One World Universe's net margin of -361.04%. One World Universe's return on equity of -- beat Blink Charging's return on equity of -56.43%.

One World Universe has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Blink Charging has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 159.05%. Given that Blink Charging has higher upside potential than One World Universe, analysts believe Blink Charging is more attractive than One World Universe.

One World Universe has a beta of 1.932, which suggesting that the stock is 93.194% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Blink Charging has a beta of 2.579, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 157.948%.

One World Universe has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Blink Charging offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. One World Universe pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Blink Charging pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

One World Universe quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Blink Charging quarterly revenues of $24.2M. One World Universe's net income of -- is lower than Blink Charging's net income of -$87.4M. Notably, One World Universe's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Blink Charging's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for One World Universe is -- versus 1.03x for Blink Charging. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CRA International has a net margin of -- compared to One World Universe's net margin of 6.82%. One World Universe's return on equity of -- beat CRA International's return on equity of 20.97%.

One World Universe has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CRA International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 11.8%. Given that CRA International has higher upside potential than One World Universe, analysts believe CRA International is more attractive than One World Universe.

One World Universe has a beta of 1.932, which suggesting that the stock is 93.194% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CRA International has a beta of 1.133, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.338%.

One World Universe has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CRA International offers a yield of 0.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share. One World Universe pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CRA International pays out 28.08% of its earnings as a dividend. CRA International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

One World Universe quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CRA International quarterly revenues of $167.7M. One World Universe's net income of -- is lower than CRA International's net income of $11.4M. Notably, One World Universe's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CRA International's PE ratio is 30.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for One World Universe is -- versus 1.95x for CRA International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Forrester Research has a net margin of -- compared to One World Universe's net margin of -5.66%. One World Universe's return on equity of -- beat Forrester Research's return on equity of -2.91%.

One World Universe has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Forrester Research has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 28.78%. Given that Forrester Research has higher upside potential than One World Universe, analysts believe Forrester Research is more attractive than One World Universe.

One World Universe has a beta of 1.932, which suggesting that the stock is 93.194% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Forrester Research has a beta of 0.905, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.523%.

One World Universe has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Forrester Research offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. One World Universe pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Forrester Research pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

One World Universe quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Forrester Research quarterly revenues of $102.5M. One World Universe's net income of -- is lower than Forrester Research's net income of -$5.8M. Notably, One World Universe's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Forrester Research's PE ratio is 226.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for One World Universe is -- versus 0.67x for Forrester Research. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gold Rock Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to One World Universe's net margin of 30.92%. One World Universe's return on equity of -- beat Gold Rock Holdings's return on equity of --.

One World Universe has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Gold Rock Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that One World Universe has higher upside potential than Gold Rock Holdings, analysts believe One World Universe is more attractive than Gold Rock Holdings.

One World Universe has a beta of 1.932, which suggesting that the stock is 93.194% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gold Rock Holdings has a beta of 5,589.833, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 558883.315%.

One World Universe has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gold Rock Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. One World Universe pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gold Rock Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

One World Universe quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Gold Rock Holdings quarterly revenues of $66K. One World Universe's net income of -- is lower than Gold Rock Holdings's net income of $20.4K. Notably, One World Universe's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Gold Rock Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for One World Universe is -- versus -- for Gold Rock Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.